Skip to main content

Using Conceptual Structures in Enterprise Architecture to Develop a New Way of Thinking and Working for Organisations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning (ICCS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10872))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Enterprise Architecture (EA) is a discipline that provides generic patterns that any organisation can reuse throughout its own business, informatics and technical components. However, EA’s current way of thinking and working to achieve this aim is not standardised. EA thus continues to “reinvent the wheel” that causes mistakes or wastes resources on rediscovering what should already be known. We, therefore, represent the specific business, information and technology meta-models as patterns that can be fully reintegrated in one repeatable meta-model for the whole organisation. The outcome is a new agile way of thinking and working, highlighted by how EA works better in enterprise layers, sub-layers and levels of abstraction. To test the meta-models, two forms of Conceptual Structures known as Conceptual Graphs (CGs) and Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) are brought together through the CGtoFCA algorithm. The algorithm identifies how the layered meta-models can share meaning and truth and without having to recombine them into one large, unwieldy meta-model as the repeatable structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The table has the layers in columns not rows, and the levels in rows not columns. This layout allows the table to best fit on the page; it should be the other way round.

  2. 2.

    The CGs are drawn in CharGer (http://charger.sourceforge.net/) as it has support for the CGIF (CG Interchange Format) in ISO/IEC 24707 Common Logic. The CGIF is passed through CGtoFCA then visualised as an FCL in FCA Concept Explorer (http://conexp.sourceforge.net/).

References

  1. Andrews, S., Polovina, S.: Exploring, reasoning with and validating directed graphs by applying formal concept analysis to conceptual graphs. In: GKR 2017, Revised Selected Papers. LNAI, vol. 10775, pp. 3–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). http://www.springer.com/gb/book/9783319781013

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Open Group: 30. content metamodel (2018). http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf92-doc/arch/chap30.html

  3. Oberle, D.: How ontologies benefit enterprise applications. Semant. Web J. 5(6), 473–491 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Polovina, S., Scheruhn, H.-J., von Rosing, M.: Modularising the complex meta-models in enterprise systems using conceptual structures. In: Developments and Trends in Intelligent Technologies and Smart Systems, pp. 261–283. IGI Global, Hershey (2018). ID: 189437

    Google Scholar 

  5. Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science. Ann. Rev. Info. Sci. Technol. 40(1), 521–543 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual graphs. In: Handbook of Knowledge Representation, Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 213–237. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. von Rosing, M.: Using the business ontology to develop enterprise standards. Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. (IJCSSA) 4(1), 48–70 (2016). ID: 171391

    Google Scholar 

  8. von Rosing, M., Urquhart, B., Zachman, J.A.: Using a business ontology for structuring artefacts: example - northern health. Int. J. Conceptual Struct. Smart Appl. (IJCSSA) 3(1), 42–85 (2015). ID: 142900

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wei, B., Delugach, H.S., Colmenares, E., Stringfellow, C.: A conceptual graphs framework for teaching UML model-based requirements acquisition. In: 2016 IEEE 29th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEET), pp. 71–75, April 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Polovina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Polovina, S., von Rosing, M. (2018). Using Conceptual Structures in Enterprise Architecture to Develop a New Way of Thinking and Working for Organisations. In: Chapman, P., Endres, D., Pernelle, N. (eds) Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning. ICCS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10872. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91379-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91379-7_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91378-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91379-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics