Abstract
When have we really understood a proof, an argument, a computational technique? This question is fundamental to every serious student. Here we propose one possible answer: when we are able to apply the above proof, argument, computational technique in a (slightly) different mathematical setting. In each exercise of this chapter, we propose the solution of a problem or the proof of a theorem (say Problem I or Theorem I). Then the reader is asked to use the idea, the reasoning, the techniques just learned to solve another problem or to prove another theorem (called Problem II or Theorem II). Some hints and comments are given.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We have already seen this theorem in Part I.
- 2.
The existence of infinitely many prime numbers of the form 4k + 1 is also true, but it requires a more difficult proof.
References
An interview with Michael Atiyah. (1984). The Mathematical Intelligencer, 6, 9–19.
Pólya, G., & Szegö, G. (1978). Problems and theorems in analysis. Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bramanti, M., Travaglini, G. (2018). To Understand, i.e., to Know How to Apply. In: Studying Mathematics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91355-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91355-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91354-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91355-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)