Skip to main content

Guidance to Transfer ‘Bench-Ready’ Medical Technology into Usual Clinical Practice: Case Study – Sensors and Spectrometer Used in EPR Oximetry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oxygen Transport to Tissue XL

Abstract

This paper considers the critical role that academics can have in the development of clinical innovations and especially how their impact can be optimized. The focus should be on establishing the safety and efficacy of new approaches while also incorporating human factors and human use considerations into the inventions. It is very advantageous to work in concert with the end-users (operators and clinicians) to help ensure that the innovation will be useful and feasible to be incorporated into actual clinical practice as intended. This strategy enables developments to tackle real clinical needs by providing novel strategies to improve patient care while using solutions that fit into clinical practice and that are welcomed by patients and clinical staff. These principles are illustrated by a case study of the development of clinical in vivo EPR oximetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note: all volunteers are under IRB approved protocols.

References

  1. Fargen KM, Frei D, Fiorella D et al (2013) The FDA approval process for medical devices: an inherently flawed system or a valuable pathway for innovation? J Neurointerv Surg 5:269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dimasi JA, Grabowski GH, Hansen RW (2016) Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ 47:20–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Norman GA (2016a) Drugs, devices and the FDA, part 1 an overview of approval processes for drugs. Am Coll Cardiol Basic Trans Sci 1(3):170–179

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Norman GA (2016b) Part 2: FDA approval of medical devices. Am Coll Cardiol Basic Trans Sci 1:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  5. Citron P (2012) Ethics considerations for medical device R&D. Prog Cardiovas Dis 55:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sung NS, Crowley WF Jr, Genel M et al (2003) Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA 289(10):1278–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L (2007) Practice-based research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 297(4):403–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. US Food and Drug Administration (2016) Applying human factors and usability engineering to medical devices. Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. Last accessed 1 Oct 2017. http://1.usa.gov/1WLMzPO; 81 Fed. Reg. 5762 (Feb. 3, 2016) https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-02-03/pdf/2016-01887.pdf

  9. Grunkemeier GL, Jin R, Wang L et al (2013) Chapter III.2.9: clinical trials for medical devices. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (eds) Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Boston, pp 1443–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-087780-8.00137-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirata H, Walczak T, Swartz HM (2000) Electronically tunable surface-coil-type resonator for L-band EPR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson 142(1):159–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schreiber W, Petryakov S, Kmiec MM et al (2016) Flexible, wireless, inductively coupled surface coil resonator for EPR tooth dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim 172(1–3):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Flood AB, Williams BB, Schreiber W et al (2016) Advances in in vivo EPR tooth biodosimetry: meeting the targets for initial triage following a large-scale radiation event. Radiat Prot Dosim 172(1–3):72–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw165

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Barry Flood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic Supplementary Materials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Flood, A.B., Wood, V.A., Schreiber, W., Williams, B.B., Gallez, B., Swartz, H.M. (2018). Guidance to Transfer ‘Bench-Ready’ Medical Technology into Usual Clinical Practice: Case Study – Sensors and Spectrometer Used in EPR Oximetry. In: Thews, O., LaManna, J., Harrison, D. (eds) Oxygen Transport to Tissue XL. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1072. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91287-5_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics