Advertisement

CoRgI: Cognitive Reasoning Interface

  • Vinícius SeguraEmail author
  • Juliana Jansen Ferreira
  • Ana Fucs
  • Marcio Ferreira Moreno
  • Rogério de Paula
  • Renato Cerqueira
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10902)

Abstract

Cognitive systems built with artificial intelligence resources (AI-powered systems) can be defined as software systems that learn at scale from their interaction with humans and environments. That kind of system allows people to augment their cognitive potential in order to harvest insights from huge quantities of data to understand complex situations, make accurate predictions about the future, and anticipate the unintended consequences of actions. These systems evolve naturally from such learning, rather than being explicitly programmed. In this approach, humans and computers work more interconnected to achieve unexpected insights. In order to be useful, an AI-powered system must be aware of the users’ goals, so it can help him/her by bringing contextual information from multiple sources, guiding through the series of tasks associated with the goals. The knowledge structuring is a challenge by itself and it has been the focus of knowledge engineering research. Once the knowledge is structured or organized, the challenge falls on UX researchers to investigate users and their tasks and goals with that structured knowledge. Questions like who the users are, what they want or need to do, in which preferred ways, and what are users’ goals can guide UX research on this matter. We argue that an AI-powered system could infer the user’s goals by observing his/her interactions with different systems and considering its knowledge base – about the user, the group(s) s/he is part of, the applications’ domains, the overall context, etc. Based on fieldwork executed for a project where a knowledge-intensive process is analyzed and discussed with support of an AI-Powered System, we propose the Cognitive Reasoning Interface (CoRgI) framework. This paper presents the fieldwork observation that led to the development of the framework, how we conceptualize the framework, and our initial validation of the framework.

Keywords

Cognitive systems AI-powered systems Cognitive assistant User experience Fieldwork 

References

  1. 1.
    Carroll, J.M.: Human computer interaction-brief intro. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edn. (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L.: Wizard of oz studies: why and how. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 193–200. ACM (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Souza, C., Leitão, C.: Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    deSouza, C.S.: The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. J. Data Semant. 4(1), 29–57 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-014-0038-4
  6. 6.
    Engelbart, D.: A conceptual framework for augmenting human intellect [summary report, contract af49 (638)-1024]. SRI International, Menlo Park (1962)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engelbart, D.C.: Toward augmenting the human intellect and boosting our collective IQ. Commun. ACM 38(8), 30–32 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hildebrandt, T.T., Cattani, G.L.: Expert system. In: Jensen, K.B., Rothenbuhler, E.W., Pooley, J.D., Craig, R.T. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, pp. 1–4. Wiley, Hoboken, October 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect244
  9. 9.
    Jansen Ferreira, J., Segura, V., Fucs, A., de Paula, R., Cerqueira, R.F.G.: Abstraction levels as support for UX design of user’s interaction logs. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10277, pp. 369–382. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58706-6_30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keim, D.A., Mansmann, F., Oelke, D., Ziegler, H.: Visual analytics: combining automated discovery with interactive visualizations. In: Jean-Fran, J.-F., Berthold, M.R., Horváth, T. (eds.) DS 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5255, pp. 2–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88411-8_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelly III, J., Hamm, S.: Smart Machines: IBM’s Watson and the Era of Cognitive Computing. Columbia University Press, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Langley, P.: The cognitive systems paradigm. Adv. Cognit. Syst. 1, 3–13 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moreno, M.F., Brandao, R., Cerqueira, R.: Challenges on multimedia for decision-making in the era of cognitive computing, San Jose, CA, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nezhad, H.R.M.: Cognitive assistance at work. In: 2015 AAAI Fall Symposium Series (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reategui, E., Zattera, C.: Do learning styles influence the way students perceive interface agents? In: Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC 2008, pp. 108–116. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Porto Alegre, Brazil (2008). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1497470.1497483
  16. 16.
    Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 1–35. Springer, Boston (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_1CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schiaffino, S., Amandi, A., Gasparini, I., Pimenta, M.S.: Personalization in e-learning: the adaptive system vs. the intelligent agent approaches. In: Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, IHC 2008, pp. 186–195. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Brazil (2008). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1497470.1497491
  18. 18.
    Schön, D., Bennett, J.: Reflective conversation with materials. In: Bringing Design to Software, pp. 171–189. ACM (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Segura, V., Ferreira, J.J., Cerqueira, R., Barbosa, S.: Uma avaliação analítica de um sistema de visualização do histórico de interação do usuário usando CDN e PoN. In: Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC 2016). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Segura, V.C.V.B., Barbosa, S.D.J.: History viewer: displaying user interaction history in visual analytics applications. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9733, pp. 223–233. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39513-5_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Snyder, C.: Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tecuci, G., Marcu, D., Boicu, M., Schum, D.A.: Knowledge Engineering: Building Cognitive Assistants for Evidence-Based Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W3C: Semantic Web - W3c (2017). https://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/. Accessed 11 January 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBM ResearchRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations