Supporting Collaboration in Human-Machine Crisis Management Networks

  • Ida Maria Haugstveit
  • Marita SkjuveEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10902)


Several parts of our modern lives are today taking place in networks where both humans and machines are key actors. With this development follows the increased need and importance of investigating related consequences and understand how we best can design technological systems to support efficient and productive human-machine networks. This paper presents the use of a human-machine network approach to nuance how we think of the interactions and collaboration that takes place in human-machine networks. Specifically, we study the complex network involved in crisis management, and show how such a network’s characteristics may have implications for, and affect collaboration. The study is based on the analysis of in-depth interviews with both system provider representatives and end-users of a collaborative tool for crisis management. Three directions in which the design and development of crisis management systems should be guided are proposed.


Human-machine networks Crisis management networks  Collaborative tool 



This work has been conducted as part of the HUMANE project (, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 645043. The authors would like to thank the participants of this study for their contributions.


  1. 1.
    Tsvetkova, M., et al.: Understanding Human-Machine Networks: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 50(1), 35 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engen, V., Pickering, J.B., Walland, P.: Machine agency in human-machine networks; impacts and trust implications. In: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction International, Toronto, Canada (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mendonça, D., Jefferson, T., Harrald, J.: Collaborative adhocracies and mix-and-match technologies in emergency management. Commun. ACM 50(3), 44–49 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turoff, M., et al.: The design of a dynamic emergency response management information system (DERMIS). JITTA Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 5(4), 1 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50(3), 540–547 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eide, A.W., et al.: Human-machine networks: towards a typology and profiling framework. In: The 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction International, Toronto, Canada (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hallberg, N., et al.: Rationale for emergency management systems for local communities: a needs assessment. In: Proceedings of ISCRAM 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    (FEMA), F.E.M.A. Cited 22 May 2017
  9. 9.
    Rosenthal, U., Boin, A., Comfort, L.K. (eds.): Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities. Charles C Thomas Publisher, London (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carver, L., Turoff, M.: Human-computer interaction: the human and computer as a team in emergency management information systems. Commun. ACM 50(3), 33–38 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shim, J.P., et al.: Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decis. Support Syst. 33(2), 111–126 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fogli, D., Guida, G.: Knowledge-centered design of decision support systems for emergency management. Decis. Support Syst. 55(1), 336–347 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jefferson, T.L.: Evaluating the role of information technology in crisis and emergency management. Vine 36(3), 261–264 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Willig, C.: Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. McGraw-Hill Education, UK (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Ezzy, D.: Qualitative Analysis. Routledge (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Følstad, A., et al.: Automation in human-machine networks: how increasing machine agency affects human agency. In: International Conference on Man-Machine Interactions (ICMMI 2017), Cracow, Poland (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SINTEFOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations