Skip to main content

Computer Modeling of Personal Autonomy and Legal Equilibrium

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cybernetics and Algorithms in Intelligent Systems (CSOC2018 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 765))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Empirical studies of personal autonomy as state and status of individual freedom, security, and capacity to control own life, particularly by independent legal reasoning, are need dependable models and methods of precise computation. Three simple models of personal autonomy are proposed. The linear model of personal autonomy displays a relation between freedom as an amount of agent’s action and responsibility as an amount of legal reaction and shows legal equilibrium, the balance of rights and duties needed for sustainable development of any community. The model algorithm of judge personal autonomy shows that judicial decision making can be partly automated, like other human jobs. Model machine learning of autonomous lawyer robot under operating system constitution illustrates the idea of robot rights. Robots, i.e. material and virtual mechanisms serving the people, deserve some legal guarantees of their rights such as robot rights to exist, proper function and be protected by the law. Robots, actually, are protected as any human property by the wide scope of laws, starting with Article 17 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but the current level of human trust in autonomous devices and their role in contemporary society needs stronger legislation to guarantee the robot rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sieckmann, J.-R.: The Logic of Autonomy: Law, Morality and Autonomous Reasoning, 262 p. Hart Publishing (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Möller, K.: The Global Model of Constitutional Rights, 240 p. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Somek, A.: The Cosmopolitan Constitution, 304 p. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kerr, O.S.: An economic understanding of search and seizure law. Univ. PA Law Rev. 3(164), 591–647 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sheliazhenko, Y.: Approach to mathematical and computer modeling of law subject’s personal autonomy. In: Materials of International Scientific Conference “Sixteenth Economic and Legal Discussions”: Legal Section, Lviv, Ukraine, pp. 3–6 (2017). https://www.academia.edu/32061240/

  6. Posner, R.A.: Economic Analysis of Law, 816 p. Aspen Publishers (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sheliazhenko, Y.: Artificial personal autonomy and concept of robot rights. Eur. J. Law Polit. Sci. 1, 17–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.20534/ejlps-17-1-17-21, https://www.academia.edu/33008964/

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted by the United Nations General Assembly at its 183rd meeting, held in Paris on 10 December, 1948. Issued by U.N. Department of Public Information

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tax Code of Ukraine. http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17

  10. State Fiscal Service of Ukraine 2016 Report. http://sfs.gov.ua/data/files/199244.pdf

  11. The Universal Charter of the Judge. https://www.iaj-uim.org/universal-charter-of-the-judges/

  12. Ashrafian, H.: Artificial intelligence and robot responsibilities: innovating beyond rights. Sci. Eng. Ethics 21(2), 317–326 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ashrafian, H.: Intelligent robots must uphold human rights. Nature 519(7544), 391 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. See § 38 of United Nations Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on Ukraine A/HRC/WG.6/28/UKR/3 of 31 August 2017

    Google Scholar 

  15. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ukraine, dated 7 August 2017, acknowledged an arithmetic mistake in previous judgment in the case № П/800/217/17 of NGO Autonomous Advocacy’s legal action against the presidential decree, that blocked social network VKontakte and others. http://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/68243741

  16. Ryndiuk, V.: Problems of legislative techniques in Ukraine: theory and practice (“Problemy zakonodavchoi tekhniky v Ukraini: teoriia ta praktyka”), 272 p. Iurydychna Dumka, Kyiv (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Onopchuk, I.: Mathematical model of legislative process management (Matematychna model upravlinnia zakonodavchym protsesom). Constitution of Ukraine as the basis for further legislation, pp. 234–240. Verkhovna Rada Legislation Institute, Kyiv (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nykolaichuk, L.: Information neuro-model of a legal person. UA patent № 117659 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yurii Sheliazhenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sheliazhenko, Y. (2019). Computer Modeling of Personal Autonomy and Legal Equilibrium. In: Silhavy, R. (eds) Cybernetics and Algorithms in Intelligent Systems . CSOC2018 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 765. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91192-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics