DSP-IR: Delay Sensitive Protocol for Intelligent Routing with Medium Access Control

  • A. C. Yogeesh
  • Shantakumar B. Patil
  • Premajyothi Patil
  • H. R. Roopashree
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 765)

Abstract

The wireless sensor network has been positioned itself from a complete network system to a sub-net of future internet namely Internet of Things, where a communications among anything to anything is possible. The extensible use of wireless sensor network makes it more risky if the security threats are not handled wisely. The conventional methods adopted for securing the WSN vulnerability based attacks introduces delay, which brings congestion in the routing flow as well as influence the quality of service. The proposed DSP-IR is a secure routing algorithm to handle security with delay sensitivity. The DSP-IR framework evaluates MAC protocols including S-MAC, Q-MAC and IH-MAC along with RSA, AES and DSP-IR encrypt process. For all the three combinations performance evaluation is done by simulating the model to know the behavior of residual energy, energy consumption and average packet delay with varying interval of message arrival time and it is found that the proposed IH-MAC with DSP-IR exhibits better performance.

Keywords

Wireless sensor network Secure routing MAC for sensor network 

References

  1. 1.
    Nukala, R., Panduru, K., Shields, A., Riordan, D., Doody, P., Walsh, J.: Internet of Things: a review from ‘Farm to Fork’. In: 2016 27th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), Londonderry, pp. 1–6 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/issc.2016.7528456
  2. 2.
    Karlof, C., Wagner, D.: Secure routing in wireless sensor networks: attacks and countermeasures. In: Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, pp. 113–127 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1109/snpa.2003.1203362
  3. 3.
    Bai, Y.: Industrial Internet of Things over tactile internet in the context of intelligent manufacturing. Cluster Comput., 1–9 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-0925-1
  4. 4.
    Badarinath, R., Prabhu, V.V.: Advances in Internet of Things (IoT) in manufacturing. In: IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, APMS, pp. 111–118 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tayebi, A., Berber, S., Swain, A.: Wireless sensor network attacks: an overview and critical analysis. In: 2013 Seventh International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), Wellington, pp. 97–102 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icsenst.2013.6727623
  6. 6.
    Lin, C., Wu, G., Yu, C.W., Yao, L.: Maximizing destructiveness of node capture attack in wireless sensor networks. J. Supercomput. 71(8), 3181–3212 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buch, D., Jinwala, D.: Detection of wormhole attacks in wireless sensor network. In: 3rd International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing (ARTCom 2011), Bangalore, pp. 7–14 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Basan, A., Basan, E., Makarevich, O.: A trust evaluation method for active attack counteraction in wireless sensor networks. In: 2017 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC), Nanjing, China, pp. 369–372 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tomić, I., McCann, J.A.: A survey of potential security issues in existing wireless sensor network protocols. IEEE Internet Things J. 4(6), 1910–1923 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2017.2749883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jedidi, A., Mohammad, A.: History trust routing algorithm to improve efficiency and security in wireless sensor network. In: 2017 14th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Marrakech, pp. 750–754 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qin, D., Yang, S., Jia, S., Zhang, Y., Ma, J., Ding, Q.: Research on trust sensing based secure routing mechanism for wireless sensor network. IEEE Access 5, 9599–9609 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Butun, I., Morgera, S.D., Sankar, R.: A survey of intrusion detection systems in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 16(1), 266–282 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/surv.2013.050113.00191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yavuz, F., Zhao, J., Yağan, O., Gligor, V.: k-connectivity in random K-out graphs intersecting Erdős-Rényi graphs. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 63(3), 1677–1692 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2016.2634422CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, J., Li, Y., Ren, J., Wu, J.: Hop-by-Hop message authentication and source privacy in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 25(5), 1223–1232 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2013.119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shen, J., Tan, H., Moh, S., Chung, I., Liu, Q., Sun, X.: Enhanced secure sensor association and key management in wireless body area networks. J. Commun. Netw. 17(5), 453–462 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/JCN.2015.000083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, S., Kim, K.: Key renewal scheme with sensor authentication under clustered wireless sensor networks. Electron. Lett. 51(4), 368–369 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2014.3327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gandino, F., Montrucchio, B., Rebaudengo, M.: Key management for static wireless sensor networks with node adding. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 10(2), 1133–1143 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2013.2288063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yogeesh, A.C., Patil, S.B., Patil, P.: A survey on energy efficient, secure routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 5(8), 17702–17709 (2016). ISSN 2319-7242Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yogeesh, A.C., Patil, S.B., Patil, P.: FEESR: framework for energy efficient secured routing in heterogeneous sensor network. In: 2016 International Conference on Circuits, Controls, Communications and Computing (I4C), Bangalore, pp. 1–7 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biswas, K., Muthukkumarasamy, V., Wu, X.W., Singh, K.: Performance evaluation of block ciphers for wireless sensor networks. In: Choudhary, R., Mandal, J., Auluck, N., Nagarajaram, H. (eds.) Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 452. Springer, Singapore (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bandirmali, N., Erturk, I., Ceken, C.: Securing data transfer in delay-sensitive and energy-aware WSNs using the scalable encryption algorithm. In: 2009 4th International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing, Melbourne, VIC, pp. 1–6 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/iswpc.2009.4800606
  22. 22.
    Shi, Y., Wang, J., Fang, X., Gu, S., Dong, L.: Modelling and control of S-MAC based wireless sensor networks control system with network-induced delay in industrial. In: 2017 4th International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), Changsha, pp. 1539–1544 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/icisce.2017.321
  23. 23.
    Liu, Y., Elhanany, I., Qi, H.: An energy-efficient QoS-aware media access control protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems, Washington, DC, pp. 189–191 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1109/mahss.2005.1542798
  24. 24.
    Ceken, C.: An energy efficient and delay sensitive centralized MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 30(1), 20–31 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Yogeesh
    • 1
  • Shantakumar B. Patil
    • 1
  • Premajyothi Patil
    • 1
  • H. R. Roopashree
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNagarjuna College of Engineering and Technology, VTUBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Publicis Sapient Consulting Pvt. Ltd.BengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations