The Tool for the Innovation Activity Ontology Creation and Visualization

  • Sergey V. Kuleshov
  • Alexandra A. Zaytseva
  • Alexey J. Aksenov
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 763)

Abstract

In this paper the problem of automatic application of the semantic analysis methods to documents on financial and economic topics in order to visualize the semantic environment map of innovation activity is discussed. The tool for the innovation activity ontology creation and visualization based on associative ontology approach is proposed.

Keywords

Ontology Innovation activity Ontology model visualization Corpus of text Associative ontology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project N 16-29-12965\17.

References

  1. 1.
    Kuleshov, S.V., Zaytseva, A.A., Markov, S.V.: Associative-ontological approach to natural language texts processing. J. Intellect. Technol. Transp. 4, 40–45 (2015). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zaytseva, A.A., Kuleshov, S.V., Mikhailov, S.N.: The method for the text quality estimation in the task of analytical monitoring of information resources. J. SPIIRAS Proc. 37(6), 144–155 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.15622/sp.37.9. (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mikhailov, S.N., Malashenko, O.I., Zaytseva, A.A.: The method for the infology analysis of patients complaints semantic content in order to organize the electronic appointments. J. SPIIRAS Proc. 42(5), 140–154 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.15622/sp.42.7. (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    TECHNOPOLIS GROUP & MIOIR: Evaluation of Innovation Activities. Guidance on methods and practices. Study funded by the European Commission, Directorate for Regional Policy (2012). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/information/evaluations/guidance_en.cfm#1
  5. 5.
    Korableva, O., Razumova, I., Kalimullina, O.: Research of innovation cycles and the peculiarities associated with the innovations life cycle stages. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Business Information Management Association Conference – Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, pp. 1853–1862 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Segev, E.: Google and the Digital Divide: The Biases of Online Knowledge, 171 p. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2010). ISBN 978-1-84334-565-7Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Introna, L.D., Nissenbaum, H.: Shaping the web: why the politics of search engines matters. J. Inf. Soc. 16(3), 169–185 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240050133634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuleshov, S.V.: The development of automatic semantic analysis system and visual dynamic glossaryies. Ph.D. (Tech) thesis, Saint-Petersburg (2005). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alexandrov, V.V., Kuleshov, S.V.: Semiological information systems – analytical self-referring. In: Materials of X International Conference and Russian Scientific School. INNOVATICA-2005, vol. 6, pp. 9–14. Moskva. Radio i svjaz’ (2005). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuznecova, J.M., Osipov, G.S., Chudova, N.V.: Intellectual analysis of scientific publications and the current state of science. J. Large-scale Syst. Control 44, 106–138 (2013). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smirnov, A.V., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., Levashova, T.: Agent-based support of mass customization for corporate knowledge management. J. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 16(4), 349–364 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smirnov, A., Levashova, T., Shilov, N.: Patterns for context-based knowledge fusion in decision support systems. J. Inf. Fusion 21, 114–129 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raufi, B., Ismaili, F., Ajdari, J., Zenuni, X.: Knowledgebase harvesting for user-adaptive systems through focused crawling and semantic web. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, vol. 1164, pp. 323–330. Association for Computing Machinery (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, H., Kang, S., Oh, S.: Ontology-based quantitative similarity metric for event matching in publish/subscribe system. J. Neurocomput. 152, 77–84 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan, S., Safyan, M.: Semantic matching in hierarchical ontologies. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 26(3), 247–257 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sabadka, D. Innovation potential metrics. J. Ann. Fac. Eng. Hunedoara Int. J. Eng. (2012). http://annals.fih.upt.ro/pdf-full/2012/ANNALS-2012-3-79.pdf
  17. 17.
    Kuleshov, S.V., Yusupov, R.M.: Is softwarization the way to import substitution? J. SPIIRAS Proc. 46(3), 5–13 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.15622/sp.46.1. (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergey V. Kuleshov
    • 1
  • Alexandra A. Zaytseva
    • 1
  • Alexey J. Aksenov
    • 1
  1. 1.St.-Petersburg Institution for Informatics and Automation of RASSt.-PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations