Skip to main content

Social Capital in American Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Social Capital in American Life

Abstract

What do we know? What don’t we know? Significant questions remain about social capital, including: have Americans’ core social networks shrunk? What is the nature of the trend in voluntary association? What is the sociological substance of the post-9/11 surge in social activity? And, ultimately: what are the interconnections of social capital and psychological attitudes?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States (U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 2014).

  2. 2.

    Steven Peter Vallas, Work (Polity Press, 212), 1.

  3. 3.

    Juliet B. Schor, The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure (Basic Books, 1992), 28–29, 1–2.

  4. 4.

    Youngjoo Cha and Kim A. Weeden, “Overwork and the Slow Convergence in the Gender Gap in Wages,” American Sociological Review (June 2014, 79), 457–485.

  5. 5.

    Stephanie Coontz, Marriage, a History, op. cit., 11.

  6. 6.

    Deborah Chambers, A Sociology of Family Life (Polity, 2012), 176.

  7. 7.

    Jacqueline Olds, M.D., and Richard S. Schwartz, M.D., The Lonely American: Drifting Apart in the Twenty-First Century (Beacon Press, 2009), 1.

  8. 8.

    Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Matthew E. Brashears, “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks Over Two Decades,” American Sociological Review (June 2006), 353–375.

  9. 9.

    Claude S. Fischer, “The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact?,” American Sociological Review (2009, 74), 413–428.

  10. 10.

    Matthew E. Brashears, “Small Networks and High Isolation? A Reexamination of American Discussion Networks,” Social Networks (2011, 33), 331–341.

  11. 11.

    Hua Wang and Barry Wellman, “Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size from 2002 to 2007,” American Behavioral Scientist (2010, 53), 1148–1169. Using data from Center for the Digital Future surveys, they find the average number of (“offline”) friends to have been 9.4 in 2002 and 11.3 in 2007.

    Benjamin Cornwell, Edward O. Laumann, and L. Philip Schumm, “The Social Connectedness of Older Adults: A National Profile,” American Sociological Review (April 2008), 185–203. Based on data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project, they estimate average core network size at 3.57. This is about 1.5 network members more than the GSS estimate for 2004 even though it only includes adults ages 57 to 85 who, as the authors point out, are assumed to be less socially active than younger adults.

  12. 12.

    Brashears, Social Networks, op. cit., 32.

  13. 13.

    Fischer, American Sociological Review, op. cit., 418.

  14. 14.

    For the interaction of age and marriage in Fig. 10.3, F = 56.515, p < .001. For the interaction of age and education level in Fig. 10.4, F = 14.097, p < .001.

  15. 15.

    The marriage-age-social capital interaction was introduced in Social Capital in America, op. cit., 81–83.

  16. 16.

    See, for example, Rima Wilkes, “Re-thinking the Decline in Trust: A comparison of Black and White Americans,” Social Science Research (2011, 40), 1596–1610.

  17. 17.

    Useful guides are available in Pamela M. Paxton, John R. Hipp, and Sandra Marquart-Pyatt, Nonrecursive Models: Endogeneity, Reciprocal Relationships and Feedback Loops (Sage, 2011), and Jian Huang, Henriette Maasen van den Brink, Wim Groot, “A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Education on Social Capital,” Economics of Education Review (2009, 28), 454–464.

References

  • Brashears, Matthew E., “Small Networks and High Isolation? A Reexamination of American Discussion Networks.” Social Networks (2011, 33).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cha, Youngjoo, and Kim A. Weeden, “Overwork and the Slow Convergence in the Gender Gap in Wages,” American Sociological Review (June 2014, 79).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Deborah, A Sociology of Family Life (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, Stephanie, Marriage, A History (New York, NY: Viking, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, Benjamin, Edward O. Laumann, and L. Philip Schumm, “The Social Connectedness of Older Adults: A National Profile,” American Sociological Review (April 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation, Crime in the United States (Southampton, PA: U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Claude S., “The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact?,” American Sociological Review (2009, 74).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Jian, Henriette Maasen van den Brink, and Wim Groot, “A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Education on Social Capital,” Economics of Education Review (2009, 28).

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Matthew E. Brashears, “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks Over Two Decades,” American Sociological Review (June 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds, Jacqueline, and Richard S. Schwartz, The Lonely American: Drifting Apart in the Twenty-First Century (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, Pamela M., John R. Hipp, and Sandra Marquart-Pyatt, Nonrecursive Models: Endogeneity, Reciprocal Relationships and Feedback Loops (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, Juliet B., The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallas, Steven Peter, Work (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Hua, and Barry Wellman, “Social Connectivity in America: Changes in Adult Friendship Network Size From 2002 to 2007,” American Behavioral Scientist (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, Rima, “Re-thinking the Decline in Trust: A comparison of Black and White Americans,” Social Science Research (2011, 40).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, B.J. (2019). Social Capital in American Life. In: Social Capital in American Life. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91180-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91180-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91179-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91180-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics