Abstract
This chapter investigates what makes cities resourceful for arriving migration flows. It is argued that the logic of socio-spatial specialization in cities, as first described by urban sociologists of the Chicago School (but wrongly attributed to ecological forces), can provide cities with resources to deal with migration. The authors focus on urban transition zones as areas specializing in the arrival and transition of newcomers, and use a Polanyian framework to analyze the extent to which these neighborhoods provide the necessary resources. Based on research in an Antwerp neighborhood, it is shown how urban “upgrading” policies undermine the transition zone’s resourcefulness and it is concluded that policy interventions should bring external resources to the transition zone and mobilize local knowledge in order to make the city more resourceful for all its inhabitants.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Since our focus in this chapter is on localized resources in these neighborhoods and their role in the process of social mobility, we consistently use the term “zone of transition.”
- 2.
Traced back to the nationality of the grandparents.
- 3.
The unemployment rate was calculated as the number of unemployed job seekers between 18 and 64 years of age divided by the total population of the same age range.
- 4.
The proportion of unemployed jobseekers of foreign origin out of the total working age (18 to 64 years) population of foreign origin.
- 5.
A Labour Force Survey conducted by the Belgian federal government in 2008 revealed that 32% of working migrants of non-EU origin had found their job or started their own business with the help of family or friends. By comparison, the proportion of Belgians who relied on their social network for employment was only 14%.
- 6.
For reasons of anonymity, all respondents’ names are pseudonyms. Interviews were conducted in English, French, or Dutch. All Dutch and French quotes were translated into English by the authors.
- 7.
- 8.
According to the official regulations the following businesses are obliged to hold a special business license: call shops, internet cafes, night shops, video stores, club associations, betting offices, shisha bars, and sexshops (Stad Antwerpen 2014).
- 9.
As a proportion of the total number of households in the neighborhood.
- 10.
This high number can also partly be explained by the fact that the city of Antwerp has a special team (Krotspotteam) that controls the quality of the housing stock in the city. In the past the team focused specifically on Antwerpen-Noord.
References
Apostel, K. 2011. Participatie in de diepte: onderzoek naar lokale kennis in ruimtelijke planning. Brussels: Plandag.
Blommaert, Jan. 2011. “The Vatican of the Diaspora.” Jaarboek voor liturgie-onderzoek 27: 243–259.
Bolt, Gideon, A. Sule Özüekren, and Deborah Phillips. 2010. “Linking Integration and Residential Segregation.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36: 169–186.
Burgess, Ernst W. 1925. “The City: An Introduction to a Research Project.” The Trend of Population. Publications of the American Sociological Society 18: 85–97.
Burgess, Ernst W. 1928. “Residential Segregation in American Cities.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 140: 105–115.
Cools, Pieter. 2014. “’We gebruiken onze rechterhand om mensen in de linkerhand te plaatsen’ Het reguleren van publieke ruimte met bestraffend sociaal beleid in Antwerpen.” Ruimte & Maatschappij 5: 36–60.
Davidson, Mark. 2008. “Spoiled Mixture: Where Does State-Led Positive Gentrification End?” Urban Studies 45: 2385–2405.
Devos, Tim. 2014. “Eerstelijnwerkers en het versmoorde ruimtelijke debat. Casus De Coninckplein Antwerpen.” Ruimte & Maatschappij 5: 61–81.
Downey, Dennis J., and David A. Smith. 2011. “Metropolitan Reconfiguration and Contemporary Zones of Transition: Conceptualizing Border Communities in Postsurburban California.” Journal of Urban Affairs 33 (1): 21–44.
Gottdiener, Mark, and Joe R. Feagin. 1988. “The Paradigm Shift in Urban Sociology.” Urban Affairs Review 24: 163–187.
Harvey, David. 1973. Social Justice and the City. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Innes, Judith Eleanor. 1990. Knowledge and Public Policy: The Search for Meaningful Indicators. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Kesteloot, Chris. 2000. “Brussels: Post-fordist Polarization in a Fordist Spatial Canvas.” In Globalizing Cities, edited by Peter Marcuse and Ronald van Kempen, 186–210. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kesteloot, Chris, and Henk Meert. 1999. “Informal Spaces: The Geography of Informal Economic Activities in Brussels.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23: 232–251.
Lees, Loretta. 2008. “Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?” Urban Studies 45: 2449–2470.
Lin, Yanliu, Bruno de Meulder, and Shifu Wang. 2011. “Understanding the ‘Village in the City’ in Guangzhou: Economic Integration and Development Issue and Their Implications for the Urban Migrant.” Urban Studies 48: 3583–3598.
Loopmans, Maarten. 2008a. “Relevance, Gentrification and the Development of a New Hegemony on Urban Policies in Antwerp, Belgium.” Urban Studies 45: 2499–2519.
Loopmans, Maarten. 2008b. “Buurtbeleid en sociale cohesie: een Antwerpse sage.” Opbouwwerk Brussel 24: 22–30.
Loopmans, Maarten P. J., Pascal de Decker, and Chris Kesteloot. 2010. “Social Mix and Passive Revolution. A Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Social Mix Rhetoric in Flanders, Belgium.” Housing Studies 25: 181–200.
Mackinnon, Danny, and Kate Driscoll Derickson. 2013. “From Resilience to Resourcefulness: A Critique of Resilience Policy and Activism.” Progress in Human Geography 37: 253–270.
McKenzie, R. D. 1924. “The Ecological Approach to the Study of the Human Community.” American Journal of Sociology 30: 287–301.
Meert, Henk, and Chris Kesteloot. 2000. “Sociaal-ruimtelijke kenmerken van economische integratiesferen.” Tijdschrift van de Belgische vereniging voor aardrijkskundige studies 68: 249–281.
Meert, Henk, Pascale Mistiaen, and Chris Kesteloot. 1997. “The Geography of Survival: Household Strategies in Urban Settings.” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 88: 169–181.
Meeus, Bruno, and Elise Schillebeeckx. 2015. “Geloofsgeïnspireerde organisaties en de woonnood van nieuwkomers in stedelijke aankomstwijken.” In Woonnood in Vlaanderen. Feiten / Mythen / Voorstellen, edited by Pascal de Decker, Bruno Meeus, Isabelle Pannecoucke, Elise Schillebeeckx, Jana Verstraete, and Emma Volckaert, 431–450. Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.
Mingione, Enzo. 1991. Fragmented Societies: A Sociology of Work Beyond the Market Paradigm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Musterd, Sako. 2005. “Social and Ethnic Segregation in Europe: Levels, Causes, and Effects.” Journal of Urban Affairs 27: 331–348.
Musterd, Sako, and Sjoerd de Vos. 2007. “Residential Dynamics in Ethnic Concentrations.” Housing Studies 22: 333–353.
Oosterlynck, Stijn, Elise Schillebeeckx, and Nick Schuermans. 2012. “Voorbij sociale mix.” In Mensen maken de stad. Bouwstenen voor een sociaalecologische toekomst, edited by Dirk Holemans, 117–127. Berchem: Epo vzw.
Peach, Ceri. 1996. “Good Segregation, Bad Segregation.” Planning Perspectives 11: 379–398.
Peach, Ceri. 2009. “Slippery Segregation: Discovering or Manufacturing Ghettos?” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35: 1381–1395.
Plummer, Ken. 1997. The Chicago School: Critical Assessments. London: Routledge.
Polanyi, Karl. 1968 (Original Publication 1944). The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Portes, Alejandro, and Julia Sensenbrenner. 1993. “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1320–1350.
Portes, Alejandro, and Leif Jensen. 1989. “The Enclave and the Entrants: Patterns of Ethnic Enterprise in Miami Before and After Mariel.” American Sociological Review 54: 929–949.
Portes, Alejandro, and Robert D. Manning. 1986. “The Immigrant Enclave. Theory and Empirical Examples.” In Competitive Ethnic Relations, edited by Susan Olzak and Joane Nagel, 646–657. Orlando: Academic Press.
Rex, John. 1968. “The Sociology of a Zone of Transition.” In Readings in Urban Sociology, edited by R.E. Pahl, 211–231. London: Pergamom.
Rose, Damaris, Annick Germain, Marie-Hélène Bacqué, Gary Bridge, Yankel Fijalkow, and Tom Slater. 2013. “‘Social Mix’ and Neighbourhood Revitalization in a Transatlantic Perspective: Comparing Local Policy Discourses and Expectations in Paris (France), Bristol (UK) and Montréal (Canada).” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 430–450.
Saeys, Arne, Stijn Oosterlynck, Gert Verschraegen, and Ympkje Albeda. 2016. Fieldwork Entrepreneurs. Antwerp: Centre on Inequality, Poverty, Social Exclusion and the City, University of Antwerp. DIVERCITIES Project, WP7, Report 2b (Belgium).
Simpson, Ludi, and Ceri Peach. 2009. “Measurement and Analysis of Segregation, Integration and Diversity: Editorial Introduction.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35: 1377–1380.
Simpson, Ludi, Vasilis Gavalas, and Nissa Finney. 2008. “Population Dynamics in Ethnically Diverse Towns: The Long-Term Implications of Immigration.” Urban Studies 45: 163–183.
Smeesters, Bernadette, Peter Arrijn, Serge Feld, and Andre Nayer. 2000. “The Occurrence of Discrimination in Belgium.” In Documenting Discrimination Against Migrant Workers in the Labour Market: A Comparative Study of Four European Countries, edited by Robert Zegers de Beijl, 41–52. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Smith, David A. 1995. “The New Urban Sociology Meets the Old—Rereading Some Classical Human-Ecology.” Urban Affairs Review 30: 432–457.
Stad Antwerpen. 2012. RUP 2060. Toelichtingsnota. Antwerpen.
Stad Antwerpen. 2014. Politiereglement uitbating en vestiging. Antwerpen.
Stad Antwerpen. 2017. Buurtmonitor. Antwerp, Belgium. http://www.antwerpen.buurtmonitor.be/.
Verhoeven, Hans. 2000. De vreemde eend in de bijt, arbeidsmarkt en diversiteit. WAV Dossier.
VROM-raad. 2006. Stad en stijging: sociale stijging als leidraad voor stedelijke vernieuwing. Den Haag: VROM-raad, Advies 054.
Wacquant, Loïc. 2007. “French Working-Class Banlieues and Black American Ghetto: From Conflation to Comparison.” Qui parle 16: 1–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schillebeeckx, E., Oosterlynck, S., De Decker, P. (2019). Migration and the Resourceful Neighborhood: Exploring Localized Resources in Urban Zones of Transition. In: Meeus, B., Arnaut, K., van Heur, B. (eds) Arrival Infrastructures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91167-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91167-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91166-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91167-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)