Skip to main content

Uncertainty Quantification and Cumulative Distribution Function: How are they Related?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 239))

Abstract

Uncertainty is described by the cumulative distribution function (CDF). Using, the CDF one describes all the main cases: the discrete case, the case when a absolutely continuous probability density exists, and the singular case, when it does not, or combinations of the three preceding cases. The reason one does not see any mention of uncertainty quantification in classical books, as Feller’s and Chung’s, is that they found no reason to call a CDF by another name. However, one has to acknowledge that to use a CDF to describe uncertainty is clumsy. The comparison of CDF to see which is more uncertain is not evident. One feels that there must be a simpler way. Why not to use some small set of statistics to reduce a CDF to a simpler measure, easier to grasp? This seems a great idea and, indeed, one finds it in the literature. Several books deal with the problem. We focus the discussion on three main cases: (1) to use mean and standard deviation to construct an envelope with them; (2) to use coefficient of variation; (3) to use Shannon entropy, a number, that could allow an ordering for the uncertainties of all CDF that have entropy, a most desirable thing. The reductions (to replace the CDF for a small set of statistics) may indeed work in some cases. But they do not always work and, moreover, the different measures they define may not be compatible. That is, the ordering of uncertainty may vary depending what set one chooses. So the great idea does not work so far, but they are happily used in the literature. One of the objectives of this paper is to show, with examples, that the three reductions used to “measure” uncertainties are not compatible. The reason it took so long to find out the mistake is that these reductions methods are applied to very complex problem that hide well the unsuitability of the reductions. Once one tests them with simpler examples one clearly sees their inadequacy. So, let us safely continue to use the CDF while a good reduction is not found!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chung, K.: A Course in Probability Theory. Academic Press, London (1974)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, vol. I and II. Wiley, New York (1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaynes, E.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106(4), 620–630 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Shannon, C.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. 27(379–423), 623–659 (1948)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, J., Eeden, C., Zidek, J.: Uncertainty and the conditional variance. Stat. Probab. Lett. 80, 1764–1770 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Conrad, K.: Probability distributions and maximum entropy, pp. 1–27 (2016). http://www.math.uconn.edu/~kconrad/blurbs/analysis/entropypost.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2016

  7. Khosravi, A., Nahavandi, S.: An optimized mean variance estimation method for uncertainty quantification of wind power forecasts. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 61, 446–454 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Motra, H., Hildebrand, J., Wuttke, F.: The Monte Carlo method for evaluating measurement uncertainty: application for determining the properties of materials. Probab. Eng. Mech. 1–9 (2016) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nordström, J., Wahlsten, M.: Variance reduction through robust design of boundary conditions for stochastic hyperbolic systems of equations. J. Comput. Phys. 282, 1–22 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zidek, J., Eeden, C.: Uncertainty, Entropy, Variance and the Effect of Partial Information. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, vol. 42. Institute of Mathematical Statistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grimmett, G., Welsh, D.: Probability an Introduction. Oxford Science Publications, New York (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Souza de Cursi, E., Sampaio, R.: Uncertainty Quantification and Stochastic Modeling with Matlab. Elsevier, ISTE Press (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Sampaio, R., Lima, R.: Modelagem Estocástica e Geração de Amostras de Variáveis e Vetores Aleatórios. Notas de Matemática Aplicada, vol. 70. SBMAC (2012). http://www.sbmac.org.br/arquivos/notas/livro_70.pdf

  14. Ebrahimi, N., Maasoumi, E., Soofi, E.: Ordering univariate distributions by entropy and variance. J. Econ. 90, 317–336 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Khodabin, M., Ahmadabadi, A.: Some properties of generalized gamma distribution. Math. Sci. 4(1), 9–28 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support given by FAPERJ, CNPq, and CAPES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Lima .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lima, R., Sampaio, R. (2018). Uncertainty Quantification and Cumulative Distribution Function: How are they Related?. In: Polpo, A., Stern, J., Louzada, F., Izbicki, R., Takada, H. (eds) Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering. maxent 2017. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 239. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91143-4_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics