Abstract
The adoption of any new technology in surgery or any other field of medicine brings new challenges. There will always be advocates on the cutting edge of innovation, while others will be slower to change. The greatest factors inhibiting the adoption of new technology are the often-higher costs associated with product acquisition and the absence of a formal pathway to best practice and surgical excellence. When robotic surgery was first clinically introduced in late 2000, only about 1000 robotic surgeries were being performed worldwide, and the cost for each procedure was largely prohibitive [1–3]. Among these costs were the cost of the system, instruments, training, and prolonged operative times. Between 2000 and 2012, the number of robotic procedures performed increased from approximately 1000–2000 per year to nearly 450,000 [4]. It is evident that robotic surgery has established itself as a standard of care for certain disease states, yet challenges still arise as the new healthcare environment balances both cost and quality [5–9].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Herron DM, Marohn M, SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:313–25. discussion 311–2
Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, Clayman RV, Ahlering TE, Albala DM, et al.; Members of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182:1126–1132.
Tandogdu Z, Vale L, Fraser C, Ramsay C. A systematic review of economic evaluations of the use of robotic assisted laparoscopy in surgery compared with open or laparoscopic surgery. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015;13:457–67.
Mehr SR, Zimmerman MP. Robotic-assisted surgery: a question of value. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20:E13.
Wright JD, Tergas AI, Hou JY, Burke WM, Chen L, Hu JC, et al. Effect of regional hospital competition and hospital financial status on the use of robotic-assisted surgery. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:612–20.
Chan JK, Gardner AB, Taylor K, Blansit K, Thompson CA, Brooks R, et al. The centralization of robotic surgery in high-volume centers for endometrial cancer patients--a study of 6560 cases in the U.S. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138:128–32.
Tabib CH, Bahler CD, Hardacker TJ, Ball KM, Sundaram CP. Reducing operating room costs through real-time cost information feedback: a pilot study. J Endourol. 2015;29(8):963.
Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, Dankelman J, Forgione A, Langø T, et al.; European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:253–288.
Williams SB, Prado K, Hu JC. Economics of robotic surgery: does it make sense and for whom? Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41:591–6.
Barbash GI, Friedman B, Glied SA, Steiner CA. Factors associated with adoption of robotic surgical technology in US hospitals and relationship to radical prostatectomy procedure volume. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1–6.
Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V. Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg. 2013;79:553–60.
Geller EJ, Matthews CA. Impact of robotic operative efficiency on profitability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:20.e1–5. Erratum in: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:546
Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:598–606.
Kranzfelder M, Staub C, Fiolka A, Schneider A, Gillen S, Wilhelm D, et al. Toward increased autonomy in the surgical OR: needs, requests, and expectations. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1681–8.
Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, Guru KA, Challacombe B, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review. BJU Int. 2013;111:194–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shah, N.L., Laungani, R.G., Kaufman, M.E. (2018). Financial Considerations in Robotic Surgery. In: Fong, Y., Woo, Y., Hyung, W., Lau, C., Strong, V. (eds) The SAGES Atlas of Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91045-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91045-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91043-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91045-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)