Abstract
Conventional neck dissection requires a long anterior neck incision and leaves a prominent scar on the neck that can be of great concern to patients (particularly young women) with early thyroid cancer and limited metastasis to one or two lateral neck lymph nodes. Remote-access endoscopic surgery of the thyroid gland has offered the opportunity to reduce the patients’ burden from these surgical scars on the neck [1–3]. In 2007, we successfully performed the first robotic thyroidectomy using a gasless transaxillary approach [4]. The shift toward robotic thyroid surgery has reformed the surgical approach for thyroid disease [5–7]. With the improved ergonomics and shortened learning curve for the new robotic thyroid surgery technique, the field of head and neck surgery has witnessed a revolution in the surgical management of thyroid cancer beyond conventional transaxillary endoscopic thyroid surgery [8, 9]. Moreover, robotic neck dissection has been reported to be a safe and meticulous technique in low-risk patients who have well-differentiated thyroid cancer with lateral neck metastasis and could be an alternative operative method. The transaxillary approach for neck dissection uses a route from the axilla to the anterior neck region; thus, slightly wider flap dissection during robotic thyroid surgery offers a comprehensive operative view and working space for node dissection [10–12]. This chapter describes the latest overview in transaxillary robotic modified radical neck dissection (MRND) techniques for thyroid cancer with limited lateral neck lymph node metastasis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Niimi M, Kan S. Clinical benefits in endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:189–95.
Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Kurihara H. Are there significant benefits of minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy? World J Surg. 2004;28:1075–8.
Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Conte M, Materazzi G, Galleri D. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Am J Surg. 2001;181:567–70.
Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2399–406.
Lee J, Chung WY. Current status of robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection using a gasless transaxillary approach. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012;24:7–15.
Lee J, Chung WY. Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future. Cancer J. 2013;19:151–61.
Lee J, Chung WY. Robotic surgery for thyroid disease. Eur Thyroid J. 2013;2:93–101.
Lee J, Yun JH, Choi UJ, Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Chung WY. Robotic versus endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid cancers: a multi-institutional analysis of early postoperative outcomes and surgical learning curves. J Oncol. 2012;2012:734541.
Lee J, Kang SW, Jung JJ, Choi UJ, Yun JH, Nam KH, et al. Multicenter study of robotic thyroidectomy: short-term postoperative outcomes and surgeon ergonomic considerations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2538–47.
Kang SW, Lee SH, Ryu HR, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, et al. Initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection for the management of thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis. Surgery. 2010;148:1214–21.
Kang SW, Lee SH, Park JH, Jeong JS, Park S, Lee CR, et al. A comparative study of the surgical outcomes of robotic and conventional open modified radical neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3251–7.
Lee J, Kwon IS, Bae EH, Chung WY. Comparative analysis of oncological outcomes and quality of life after robotic versus conventional open thyroidectomy with modified radical neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma and lateral neck node metastases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:2701–8.
Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY. Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3186–94.
Lee J, Na KY, Kim RM, Oh Y, Lee JH, Lee J, et al. Postoperative functional voice changes after conventional open or robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2963–70.
Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY. The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:226–32.
Lee J, Lee JH, Nah KY, Soh EY, Chung WY. Comparison of endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1439–46.
Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kim BM, Kwak JY, Lee EJ, Park CS, et al. Thyroglobulin measurement in fine-needle aspirate washouts: the criteria for neck node dissection for patients with thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol. 2009;70:145–51.
Caron NR, Clark OH. Papillary thyroid cancer: surgical management of lymph node metastases. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2005;6:311–22.
Lee J, Sung TY, Nam KH, Chung WY, Soh EY, Park CS. Is level IIb lymph node dissection always necessary in N1b papillary thyroid carcinoma patients? World J Surg. 2008;32:716–21.
Caron NR, Tan YY, Ogilvie JB, Triponez F, Reiff ES, Kebebew E, et al. Selective modified radical neck dissection for papillary thyroid cancer--is level I, II and V dissection always necessary? World J Surg. 2006;30:833–40.
Liss MA, McDougall EM. Robotic surgical simulation. Cancer J. 2013;19:124–9.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to Dong-Su Jang, (Medical Illustrator, Medical Research Support Section, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for his help with the figures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ban, E.J., Chung, W.Y. (2018). Transaxillary Robotic Modified Radical Neck Dissection. In: Fong, Y., Woo, Y., Hyung, W., Lau, C., Strong, V. (eds) The SAGES Atlas of Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91045-1_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91045-1_43
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91043-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91045-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)