Abstract
This chapter provides a summary of the differences found in the sample between the two violence types, including the degree of IPV, criminal history, substance/drug offenses, assault, fraud, and trespassing. The relationship between the offender and the animal victim was more frequently found with the affective offenders. The type of animal cruelty acts differed between the affective and predatory types. Finally, the motivations for the animal cruelty act was different between the affective and predatory types, with predatory offenders more likely motivated due to the offender’s needs/wants, animal being unwanted, and to experience nonspecific sadism. Affective offenders were more motivated by a third party and due to the action by the animal.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Levi, M. D., Nussbaum, D. S., & Rich, J. B. (2010). Neuropsychological and personality characteristics of predatory, irritable, and nonviolent offenders: Support for a typology of criminal human aggression. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(6), 633–655.
Meloy, J. R. (2000). Violence risk and threat assessment. San Diego, CA: Specialized Training Services.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoffer, T., Hargreaves-Cormany, H., Muirhead, Y., Meloy, J.R. (2018). Comparison of Affective and Predatory Offenders. In: Violence in Animal Cruelty Offenders. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91038-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91038-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91037-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91038-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)