Skip to main content

Three Stages of Technical Artifacts’ Life Cycle: Based on a Four Factors Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Engineering

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 31))

Abstract

Technical artifacts had been a lost theme in philosophy for a long time until the emergence of philosophy of technology in the end of nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, Herbert Simon put forward sciences of the artificial, and Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers proposed a theory of the dual nature of technical artifacts. From the point of view of philosophy of technology, Aristotle’s four causes theory is an explanation on the nature of technical artifacts in essence rather than that of the natural world. However, Aristotle, Simon, Kroes and Meijers did not pay attention to technical artifacts’ life cycle, which inevitably leads to the failure of their theory of technical artifacts to some extent. The fact that technical artifacts, like living beings, are as mortal as human beings means that they also have a life cycle from birth to death. In order to interpret these phenomena, we plan to raise a theory of four factors of technical artifacts. However, this paper only aims to define the life cycle of technical artifacts as three stages, i.e. creation, vitality, and ending. And it also going to examine the creation stage and re-interpret Aristotle’s four causes theory according to the four factors theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buchanan, R. (2015). Design ethics. In J. B. Holbrook (Ed.), Ethics, science, technology, and engineering: A global resource (pp. 557–563). Farmington Hills: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcon, A. (2006). Aristotle on causality. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-causality/#toc. Online stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Accessed 31 Nov 2016.

  • Fan, Q. (2005). Kaogongji de gongyi sixiang [The crafts thoughts of Yijing]. Shi xue yue kan [Journal of Historical Sciences], 10, 119–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffi, J. -Y. (2000). Jishu zhexue [Philosophy of technology] (D. Maoyong, Trans.). Beijing: Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In W. Lovitt (Ed.), The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 3–35). New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, P. (2012). Technical artefacts: Creations of mind and matter. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (2002). The dual nature of technical atrtifacts—Presentation of a new research programme. Techne: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 6(2), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, B. (2002). Gongcheng zhexue yinlun [An introduction to the philosophy of engineering]. Zhengzhou: Daxiang chubanshe [Daxiang Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (2000). The German ideology. Online Version: Marx/Engels Internet Archive. marxists.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrotti, M. (2015). Artificiality. In J. B. Holbrook (Ed.), Ethics, science, technology, and engineering: A global resource (Vol. 1, pp. 127–129). Farmington Hills: Macmillan Reference USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinzinger, R., & Martin, M. W. (2000). Introduction to engineering ethics. Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, R. (1993). Kao gong ji yi zhu [Translation and Annotation of Kao Gong Ji]. Shanghai: Shanghai Classic Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bocong Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, N., Li, B. (2018). Three Stages of Technical Artifacts’ Life Cycle: Based on a Four Factors Theory. In: Fritzsche, A., Oks, S. (eds) The Future of Engineering. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91029-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics