Abstract
Technical artifacts had been a lost theme in philosophy for a long time until the emergence of philosophy of technology in the end of nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, Herbert Simon put forward sciences of the artificial, and Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers proposed a theory of the dual nature of technical artifacts. From the point of view of philosophy of technology, Aristotle’s four causes theory is an explanation on the nature of technical artifacts in essence rather than that of the natural world. However, Aristotle, Simon, Kroes and Meijers did not pay attention to technical artifacts’ life cycle, which inevitably leads to the failure of their theory of technical artifacts to some extent. The fact that technical artifacts, like living beings, are as mortal as human beings means that they also have a life cycle from birth to death. In order to interpret these phenomena, we plan to raise a theory of four factors of technical artifacts. However, this paper only aims to define the life cycle of technical artifacts as three stages, i.e. creation, vitality, and ending. And it also going to examine the creation stage and re-interpret Aristotle’s four causes theory according to the four factors theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Buchanan, R. (2015). Design ethics. In J. B. Holbrook (Ed.), Ethics, science, technology, and engineering: A global resource (pp. 557–563). Farmington Hills: Macmillan Reference USA.
Falcon, A. (2006). Aristotle on causality. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-causality/#toc. Online stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Accessed 31 Nov 2016.
Fan, Q. (2005). Kaogongji de gongyi sixiang [The crafts thoughts of Yijing]. Shi xue yue kan [Journal of Historical Sciences], 10, 119–121.
Goffi, J. -Y. (2000). Jishu zhexue [Philosophy of technology] (D. Maoyong, Trans.). Beijing: Commercial Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In W. Lovitt (Ed.), The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 3–35). New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Kroes, P. (2012). Technical artefacts: Creations of mind and matter. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (2002). The dual nature of technical atrtifacts—Presentation of a new research programme. Techne: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 6(2), 4–8.
Li, B. (2002). Gongcheng zhexue yinlun [An introduction to the philosophy of engineering]. Zhengzhou: Daxiang chubanshe [Daxiang Press].
Marx, K. (2000). The German ideology. Online Version: Marx/Engels Internet Archive. marxists.org.
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Negrotti, M. (2015). Artificiality. In J. B. Holbrook (Ed.), Ethics, science, technology, and engineering: A global resource (Vol. 1, pp. 127–129). Farmington Hills: Macmillan Reference USA.
Schinzinger, R., & Martin, M. W. (2000). Introduction to engineering ethics. Boston: McGraw Hill.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wen, R. (1993). Kao gong ji yi zhu [Translation and Annotation of Kao Gong Ji]. Shanghai: Shanghai Classic Publishing House.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, N., Li, B. (2018). Three Stages of Technical Artifacts’ Life Cycle: Based on a Four Factors Theory. In: Fritzsche, A., Oks, S. (eds) The Future of Engineering. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91029-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91029-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91028-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91029-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)