Shock Waves Confer Immunity Against Infections in Mice

  • Akshay Datey
  • Dipshikha Chakravortty
  • Gopalan JagadeeshEmail author
Conference paper


Shock waves are essentially nonlinear waves that propagate at supersonic speeds. Any sudden release of energy will result in the formation of shock waves. Personnel at the war fields are constantly exposed to shock waves generated by bombarding ammunition. The short-term and long-term effects of this exposure on various systems of the body are not clearly understood. In this study, we have shown for the first time that shock wave exposure confers protective immunity in a murine model. We have tested this with Salmonella typhimurium in Balb/c mice. War field conditions were mimicked in the laboratory using the diaphragmless shock tube. Infection challenges post shock wave exposure were evaluated by checking the organ load of Salmonella in the spleen, liver, and mesenteric lymph nodes. It was found that the bacterial load in these organs was significantly lower as compared to the control group of animals. The mechanism of this phenomenon was also addressed by measuring the cytokine levels in serum of the animals. It was observed that the proinflammatory cytokine expression is enhanced after exposure to shock waves. In a nutshell, we show that shock waves can induce protective immunity against infections by altering the levels of proinflammatory cytokines.


Shock wave Salmonella Cytokines Organ load Diaphragmless shock tube 


  1. 1.
    J.M. Wightman, S.L. Gladish, Ann Emerg Med 37(6), 664–678 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Aboudara et al., Primary blast lung injury at a NATO role 3 hospital. J. R. Army Med. Corps 160(2), 161–166 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.A. Elder, A. Cristian, Blast-related mild traumatic brain injury: mechanisms of injury and impact on clinical care. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 76(2), 111–118 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.S. Hariharan et al., Diaphragmless shock wave generators for industrial applications of shock waves. Shock Waves 21(3), 301–306 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.J. Kane et al., Altered gene expression in cultured microglia in response to simulated blast overpressure: possible role of pulse duration. Neurosci. Lett. 522(1), 47–51 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.A. McAteer, A.P. Evan, The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy. Semin. Nephrol. 28(2), 200–213 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Parkin, B. Cohen, An overview of the immune system. Lancet 357(9270), 1777–1789 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.M. Wightman, S.L. Gladish, Explosions and blast injuries. Ann. Emerg. Med. 37(6), 664–678 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akshay Datey
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dipshikha Chakravortty
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gopalan Jagadeesh
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre for Biosystems Science & EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Microbiology & Cell BiologyIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations