Management of Services of a Hyperconverged Infrastructure Using the Coordinator

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 754)

Abstract

Modern data centers’ providers are gradually moving away from traditional and multi-vendor IT infrastructures to open, standardized and interchangeable solutions that are based on a software defined approach to managing data center resources. The authors analyze the architectural features, requirements, limitations, hardware and software of hyperconverged infrastructures and their advantages in comparison with traditional and converged architectures deployed in data centers. The authors propose to employ two-level coordination schema to manage compute, storage, network and virtualization subsystems of hyperconverged infrastructure along with the self-management algorithms inside these subsystems.

Keywords

Data center Hyperconverged system Coordination 

References

  1. 1.
    Barham, P., Dragovic, B., Fraser, K., Hand, S., Harris, T., Ho, A., Neugebauer, R., Pratt, I., Warfield, A.: Xen and the art of virtualization. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., Lu, S.: Cloud computing and grid computing 360-degree compared. In: Grid Computing Environments Workshop, GCE 2008, pp. 1–10 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mell, P., Grance, T.: The NIST definition of cloud computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication 800-145, Gaithersburg, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agarwal, S., Yadav, S., Yadav, A.K.: An efficient architecture and algorithm for resource provisioning in fog computing. Int. J. Inf. Eng. Electron. Bus. (IJIEEB) 8(1), 48–61 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2016.01.06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barroso, L.A., Clidaras, J., Hölzle, U.: The datacenter as a computer: an introduction to the design of warehouse-scale machines. Synth. Lect. Comput. Archit. 8(3), 1–154 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barroso, L.: Warehouse-scale Computers. Invited talk at the USENIX Annual Technical Conference, Santa Clara, CA (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Open Network Foundation: Software-defined networking: The new norm for networks. https://www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/sdn-resources/white-papers/wp-sdn-newnorm.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  8. 8.
    DMTF DSP-IS0501: Software Defined Data Center (SDDC) Definition (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Software-Defined Data Center. https://www.vmware.com/solutions/software-defined-datacenter.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  10. 10.
    Jararweh, Y., Al-Ayyoub, M., Benkhelifa, E., Vouk, M., Rindos, A.: Software defined cloud: survey, system and evaluation. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 58, 56–74 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, C.S., Brech, B.L., Crowder, S., Dias, D.M., Franke, H., Hogstrom, M., Lindquist, D., Pacifici, G., Pappe, S., Rajaraman, B., Rao, J.: Software defined environments: an introduction. IBM J. Res. Dev. 58(2/3), 1–15 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    RightScale 2017 State of the Cloud Report. https://www.rightscale.com/2017-cloud-report. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  13. 13.
    IDC FutureScape: Worldwide Datacenter 2018 Predictions Description, October 2017Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asyabi, E., Sharifi, M.: A new approach for dynamic virtual machine consolidation in cloud data centers. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 7(4), 61–66 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2015.04.07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jain, S., Sharma, V.: Enhanced load balancing approach to optimize the performance of the cloud service using virtual machine migration. Int. J. Eng. Manuf. (IJEM) 7(1), 41–48 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.5815/ijem.2017.01.04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaur, A., Kaur, B., Singh, D.: Optimization techniques for resource provisioning and load balancing in cloud environment: a review. Int. J. Inf. Eng. Electron. Bus. (IJIEEB) 9(1), 28–35 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.5815/ijieeb.2017.01.04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rolik, O., Telenyk, S., Zharikov, E.: IoT and cloud computing: the architecture of microcloud-based IoT infrastructure management system. In: Emerging Trends and Applications of the Internet of Things, pp. 198–234. IGI Global, Hershey (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rolik, A.: Service level management of corporate IT infrastructure based on the coordinator. Visnyk NTUU “KPI” Inf. Oper. Comput. Sci. 59, 98–105 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Butler, A., Dawson, P., Palmer, J., Weiss, G.J., Yamada, K.: Magic Quadrant for Integrated Systems (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthew, M., Eric, S.: Quantifying the Business Value of Nutanix Solutions. IDC, August 2015Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Million IOPS in 1 VM – World First for HCI with Nutanix. http://longwhiteclouds.com/2017/11/14/1-million-iops-in-1-vm-world-first-for-hci-with-nutanix/. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  22. 22.
    Nutanix Products Series. http://www.nutanix.com/products/hardware-platforms/. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  23. 23.
    Hyper-Converged Infrastructure. https://www.vmware.com/products/hyper-converged-infrastructure.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
    Scale Computing Hardware Platforms. https://www.scalecomputing.com/products/hardware-platforms/. Accessed 13 Dec 2017
  26. 26.
    Mesarovic, M.D., Macko, D., Takahara, Y.: Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel Systems. Academic Press, New York (1970)MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Automation and Control in Technical SystemsNational Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”KyivUkraine
  2. 2.Department of Theoretical Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical and Computer EngineeringCracow University of TechnologyCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations