Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Motivation of Energy Saving Within the Corporate Market Responsibility of Economic Entities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Sector: A Systemic Analysis of Economy, Foreign Trade and Legal Regulations

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 44))

Abstract

Despite the unconditional importance of the role of the state as the guiding coordinator of the efforts of the society and the energy saving business, the key role in this process belongs to the economic entities that directly implement the energy saving strategy adopted at the national level. Therefore, it is important to involve them in the process and ensure that they are interested in its results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Inshakova, A. O., Goncharov, A. I., & Sevostyanov, M. V. (2017). Institutional ambiguity of regulation of possessory relations in modern Russia. Overcoming Uncertainty of Institutional Environment as a Tool of Global Crisis Management, 1, 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inshakova, A. O., Goncharov, A. I., Kazachenok, O. P., & Kochetkova, S. Y. (2017b). Syndicated lending: Intensification of transactions and development of legal regulation in modern Russia. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 3(25), 838–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inshakova, A. O., Frolov, D. P., Davydova, M. L., & Marushchak, I. V. (2018). Institutional factors of evolution and strategic development of general purpose technologies. Espacios, 1, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levada-center. (2015). Ecological situation. Retrieved June 21, 2017, from http://www.levada.ru/2015/06/18/ekologicheskaya-obstanovka/.

  • Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation. (2015). State report on the state of energy conservation and energy efficiency in the Russian Federation in 2015. Retrieved June 21, 2017, from https://gisee.ru/upload/iblock/641/641965760ac81cfec023054748d34238.pdf.

  • Wittenberg, E. I. (2015). Environmental responsibility of Russian companies. Retrieved June 21, 2017, from http://dnevniki.ykt.ru/ivanshamaev/720400.

  • RIA Rating. (2016). The ranking of European countries according to the cost of electricity in 2016. Retrieved June 21, 2017, from http://www.riarating.ru/countries_rankings/20160701/630029918.html.

  • Bazarhanova, A., Kor, A.-L., & Pattinson, C. (2017). A belief rule-based environmental responsibility assessment for small and medium-sized enterprise. FTC 2016—Proceedings of Future Technologies Conference, 7821673, pp. 637–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, L., Cui, J., & Jo, H. (2016). Corporate environmental responsibility and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 563–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubham, Charan, P., & Murty, L. S. (2016). Organizational adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in India: integrating institutional theory and corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazprom. (2017). Environmental report of PJSC « Gazprom » for the year 2016. Retrieved June 21, 2017, from http://www.gazprom.ru/f/posts/36/607118/gazprom-ecology-report-2016-ru.pdf.

  • Gkorezis, P., & Petridou, E. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and pro-environmental behaviour: Organisational identification as a mediator. European Journal of International Management, 11(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirose, K., Lee, S.-H., & Matsumura, T. (2017). Environmental corporate social responsibility: A note on the first-mover advantage under price competition. Economics Bulletin, 37(1), 214–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, G. D., Lester, L., Ji, M., (…), Pope, C. G., & Van Der Does-Ishikawa, L. (2017). Environmental pollution and the media: Political discourses of risk and responsibility in Australia, China and Japan. Environmental Pollution and the Media: Political Discourses of Risk and Responsibility in Australia, China and Japan, c. 1–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karassin, O., & Bar-Haim, A. (2016). Multilevel corporate environmental responsibility. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Park, K., & Ryu, D. (2017). Corporate environmental responsibility: A legal origins perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudlak, R., & Kisiała, W. (2017). Environmental effects of social business responsibility—Institutional approach | [Środcmiskovve efekty społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu—ujcie instytucjonalne: Wprowadzenie]. Ekonomista, 2017–January (3), pp. 243–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrère, C. (2017). Environmental ethics: Respect and responsibility (pp. 15–26). Rethinking Nature: Challenging Disciplinary Boundaries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv, R. S., & Liu, H. R. (2014). Enterprises’ participation in energy-saving activities’ motivation mechanism model study. Advanced Materials Research, 869–870, 404–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. F. (2016). Individual responsibility for environmental degradation: The moral and practical route to change. Environmental Ethics, 38(4), 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, Y., Kobayashi, T., Anpo, Y., & Ohnuma, S. (2015). The long-term effects of intrinsic motivation on household energy-saving behavior: With actual energy use and self-reported behavior. Research in Social Psychology, 31(3), 160–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulia, P., Behura, A. K., & Kar, S. (2017). Corporate environmental responsibility for a sustainable future | [Odpowiedzialność środowiskowa biznesu dla zrównoważonej przyszłości]. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 12(2), 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, E., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). What motivations drive sustainable energy-saving behavior? An examination in South Korea. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 494–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steimer, F. L., & Steimer, T. (2010). Green E-Business: Sustainable advancements in energy saving and pollution prevention (IEEE-DEST 2010). 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies—Conference Proceedings of IEEE-DEST 2010, DEST 2010, 05610639, pp. 252–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S.-H., Habibullah, M. S., & Tan, S.-K. (2017). Corporate governance and environmental responsibility. Annals of Tourism Research, 63, 213–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, M., & D’Amato, A. (2017). Corporate environmental responsibility and financial performance: Does bidirectional causality work? Empirical evidence from the manufacturing industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(2), 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thörn, H., & Svenberg, S. (2017). The Swedish environmental movement: Politics of responsibility between climate justice and local transition. Climate Action in a Globalizing World: Comparative Perspectives on Environmental Movements in the Global North, pp. 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicianová, J. H., & Hronec, S. (2017). Environmental impact of application on the concept of corporate social responsibility in selected EU countries | [Środowiskowe konsekwencje wprowadzania koncepcji odpowiedzialności społecznej biznesu w wybranych krajach UE]. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 12(2), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Z., Shen, H., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2017). How does environmental corporate social responsibility matter in a dysfunctional institutional environment? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xidonas, P., Doukas, H., Mavrotas, G., & Pechak, O. (2016). Environmental corporate responsibility for investments evaluation: an alternative multi-objective programming model. Annals of Operations Research, 247(2), 395–413.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zaripova, V. M., Petrova, I. Y., Kravets, A. G., & Evdoshenko, O. (2015). Knowledge bases of physical effects and phenomena for method of energy-informational models by means of ontologies. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 535, 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhulavskyi, A Yu., Smolennikov, D. O., & Kostyuchenko, N. M. (2017). Social and environmental responsibility strategies of business. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 3, 134–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the RFBR according to the research project No. 18-010-00103 A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of World Economics and Economic Theory, Volgograd State Tecnical University, Volgograd, Russia

    Elena G. Popkova

  2. Department of Economic Theory, World Regional Economics, Institute of Economics and Finance, Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russia

    Oleg V. Inshakov

  3. Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Federal Research Center of Agrarian Economy and Social Development of Rural Areas – All Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Economics”, Moscow, Russia

    Aleksei V. Bogoviz

Authors
  1. Elena G. Popkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oleg V. Inshakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aleksei V. Bogoviz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena G. Popkova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russia

    Oleg V. Inshakov

  2. Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russia

    Agnessa O. Inshakova

  3. Volgograd State Technical University, Volgograd, Russia

    Elena G. Popkova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Popkova, E.G., Inshakov, O.V., Bogoviz, A.V. (2019). Motivation of Energy Saving Within the Corporate Market Responsibility of Economic Entities. In: Inshakov, O., Inshakova, A., Popkova, E. (eds) Energy Sector: A Systemic Analysis of Economy, Foreign Trade and Legal Regulations. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90966-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90966-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90965-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90966-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation