Abstract
The constitution of gender in transnational families is explored in this chapter by asking the questions “who cares for the children?” and “who cares for the elderly?” The authors compare the experience of children of migrant fathers and mothers, as well as that of the elderly parents of immigrant sons and daughters. They find that there is a stalled gender revolution from the lives of left-behind children and elderly: the men who either stay behind or (im)migrate act as reluctant caregivers, while the women who either stay behind or (im)migrate remain obliged to undertake care work. As the authors illustrate, it is the women who maintain the responsibility for care work in a transnational family. Despite some scholars celebrating the transformation of gender notions that women’s migration has instigated in the gender division of labor within the family, the authors demonstrate that gender is stubborn rather than malleable. Lastly, the authors conclude by discussing the key social forces that are responsible for stalling gender transformation in the transnational family and end by identifying areas of research that can advance the knowledge of gender and its constitution in transnational families.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Abrego, L. (2014). Sacrificing families: Navigating laws, labor, and love across borders. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Amin, I., & Ingman, S. (2014). Elder care in the transnational setting: Insights from Bangladeshi transnational families in the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural erontology, 29(3), 315–328.
Baldassar, L. (2007). Transnational families and the provision of moral and emotional support: The relationship between truth and distance. Identities, 14(4), 385–409.
Baldassar, L., Baldock, C., & Wilding, R. (2007). Families caring across borders: Migration, ageing and transnational caregiving. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baldock, C. (2000). Migrants and their parents: Caregiving from a distance. Journal of Family Issues, 21(2), 205–224.
Dreby, J. (2010). Divided by borders: Mexican migrants and their children. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fan, Y. K. (2017). Unequal caregiving: Stratified transnational eldercare among Taiwanese immigrant women. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Francisco, V. (2015). ‘The internet is magic’: Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 173–190.
Gamburd, M. (2008). Milk teeth and jet planes: Kin relations in families of Sri Lanka’s transnational domestic servants. City and Society, 20(1), 5–31.
Grewal, I., & Kaplan, C. (1994). Introduction: Transnational feminist practices and questions of postmodernity. In I. Grewal & C. Kaplan (Eds.), Scattered hegemonies: Postmodernity and transnational feminist practices (pp. 1–35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin Books.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P., & Avila, E. (1997). I’m here, but I’m there: The meanings of Latina transnational motherhood. Gender & Society, 11(5), 548–571.
Ikels, C. (2004). Filial piety: Practice and discourse in contemporary East Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Jones, G. (2007). Delayed marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia. Population and Development Review, 33(3), 453–478.
Kim, J. (2012). Remitting ‘filial co-habitation’: ‘Actual’ and ‘virtual’ co-residence between Korean professional migrant adult children couples in Singapore and their elderly parents. Ageing & Society, 32(8), 1337–1359.
Lan, P. C. (2006). Global Cinderellas: Migrant domestics and newly rich employers in Taiwan. Durham: Duke University Press.
Madianou, M. (2012). Migration and the accentuated ambivalence of motherhood: The role of ICTs in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 12(3), 277–295.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. New York: Routledge.
Manalansan, M. (2006). Queer intersections: Sexuality and gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 224–249.
Mazzucato, V., & Schans, D. (2011). Transnational families and the well-being of children: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(4), 704–712.
McKay, D. (2012). Global Filipinos migrants’ lives in the virtual village. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Merla, L. (2015). Salvadoran migrants in Australia: An analysis of transnational families’ capability to care across borders. International Migration, 53(6), 153–165.
Merla, L., & Baldassar, L. (2011). Transnational caregiving between Australia, Italy and El Salvador: The impact of institutions on the capability to care at a distance. In E. Addis, P. de Villota, F. Degavre, & J. Eriksen (Eds.), Gender and well-being: The role of institutions (pp. 147–162). New York: Routledge.
Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Parreñas, R. S. (2017). Love’s labor’s cost: The family life of migrant domestic workers. World Policy Journal, 34(3), 16–20.
Pertierra, R. (2005). Mobile phones, identity and discursive intimacy. Human Technology, 1(1), 23–44.
Ruggles, S. (2007). The decline of intergenerational coresidence in the United States, 1850 to 2000. American Sociological Review, 72(6), 962–989.
Senyurekli, A., & Detzner, D. (2008). Intergenerational relationships in a transnational context: The case of Turkish families. Family Relations, 57(4), 457–467.
Stacey, J. (1998). Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late-twentieth-century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sun, K. C. Y. (2012). Fashioning reciprocal norms of elder care: A case of immigrants in the U.S. and their parents in Taiwan. Journal of Family Issues, 33(9), 1240–1271.
Thornton, A., & Lin, H. S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tsai, S. L., Gates, H., & Chiu, H. Y. (1994). Schooling Taiwan’s women: Educational attainment in the mid-20th century. Sociology of Education, 67(4), 243–263.
Whyte, M. (2004). Filial obligations in Chinese families: Paradoxes of modernization. In C. Ikels (Ed.), Filial piety: Practice and discourse in contemporary East Asia (pp. 106–127). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Zhan, H., & Montgomery, R. (2003). Gender and elder care in China: The influence of filial piety and structural constraints. Gender & Society, 17(2), 209–219.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fan, YK., Parreñas, R.S. (2018). Who Cares for the Children and the Elderly? Gender and Transnational Families. In: Ducu, V., Nedelcu, M., Telegdi-Csetri, A. (eds) Childhood and Parenting in Transnational Settings. International Perspectives on Migration, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90942-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90942-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90941-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90942-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)