Abstract
Our discussion of the topic of the protection of individuals from big companies’ and multinationals’ malpractice, according both to the European and the Greek Competition Law, moves along two separate axes: one having to do with a presentation of the current situation prevailing in the field of the Greek Competition Law, i.e. the situation prior to the implementation of the EU Directive 2014/104 and the other related to a forecast of the possible consequences of this implementation. For this second part, we make the choice to refer ourselves to the US Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA) and the possibility of the formation of a framework of international law rules protecting human rights from the breaches and trespasses of big companies. We conclude that when Competition Law rules fulfil their inherent goal, that is welfare of the society as a whole, they have the potential to operate as a tool of enhancing civil society vis-à-vis big companies and multinationals, thus moving in parallel with international law’s endeavour to create an area of protection of human rights from their malpractice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
April 2018.
- 2.
Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (OJ L 349, 5.12.2014, p. 1).
- 3.
- 4.
Bishop and Walker (1999), p. 5.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
Kaplow (2012), pp. 30–31.
- 8.
Papadopoulos (2010), pp. 36–50.
- 9.
Unfair Competition Law 146/1914, inspired by the German legislation.
- 10.
Tzouganatos (2005).
- 11.
Truli (2009), p. 188.
- 12.
Loukas and Nteka (2010), p. 1.
- 13.
Law 703/1977 had been previously amended to a greater or lesser extent by a series of acts, such as Laws 1934/1991, 2000/1991, 2296/1995, 2323/1995, 2741/1999, 2837/2000, 2941/2001, 3105/2003, 3373/2005 and 3784/2009.
- 14.
Truli (2012), pp. 280–285.
- 15.
Truli (2012), pp. 280–285.
- 16.
Truli (2012), p. 285.
- 17.
Dabbah (2003).
- 18.
Robertson (2012), pp. 232–234.
- 19.
US 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, Kiobel vs. Royal Dutch Petroleum, September 17, 2001, in Robertson (2012), pp. 235–236.
- 20.
Robertson (2012), p. 234.
- 21.
Hutchens (2008).
- 22.
Robertson (2012), pp. 236–237.
- 23.
Robertson (2012), p. 237.
- 24.
Alston (2005).
- 25.
Compa and Diamond (1996).
- 26.
Robertson (2012), pp. 238–239.
- 27.
See also Frenz (2016), pp. 626, 628–629.
References
Alston P (2005) Labour rights as human rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Aubert C (2003) Competition Policy for countries with different development levels. Paper presented at the CEPR Competition Policy in International Markets Workshop, October 17–18 2003. www.cepr.org/meets/wkcn/6/6613/papers/Aubert.pdf Accessed 10 Apr 2018
Bishop S, Walker M (1999) Economics of EC competition law: concepts, application and measurement. Sweet & Maxwell, London
Compa L, Diamond S (eds) (1996) Human rights, labour rights and international trade. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
Cseres K (2005) Competition law and consumer protection. Kluwer Law International, The Hague
Dabbah M (2003) The internationalisation of antitrust policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Frenz W (2016) Handbook of EU competition law. Springer, London
Hutchens LK (2008) International law in the American Courts – Khulumani vs Barklay National Bank: the decision heard “round the corporate world”. German Law J 9:639–681
Kaplow L (2012) On the choice of welfare standards in competition law. In: Zimmer D (ed) The goals of competition law. ASCOLA competition law series. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 3–27
Lorenz M (2013) An introduction to EU competition law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Loukas D, Nteka L (2010) The Memorandum of Understanding on Specific Economic and Competition Policy Conditionality for Granting Financial Assistance: Greek point of view. e-Competitions 37517. http://www.concurrences.com/fr/bulletin/news-issues/may-2010/The-Memorandum-of-Understanding-on. Accessed 17 Apr 2018
Motta M (2004) Competition policy, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nihoul P (2012) Do words matter? A discussion on words used to designate values associated with competition law. In: Zimmer D (ed) The goals of competition law. ASCOLA competition law series. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 219–249
Papadopoulos A (2010) The international dimension of EU competition law and politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Robertson G (2012) Crimes against humanity – the struggle for global justice. Penguin, London
Truli Ε (2009) Competition in the telecommunications sector: delineation of competences between the NCA and the NRA – the example of Greece. J E-Commer Technol Commun 8:188–196
Truli E (2012) New Greek law on the protection of free competition: key changes and first impressions. Eur Competition Law Rev 6:280–285
Tzouganatos D (2005) The Objective of Upgrading the Competition Commission and the Failure of Law 3373/2005 Amending Law 703/77. Deltio Epichiriseon kai Etairion 1034–1048
Whish R (2003) Competition law, 5th edn. Lexis Nexis, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Livas, S.S. (2018). Contemporary Trends in International Law in Relation to the Protection of Individuals from Multinationals’ Malpractice: Greek Competition Law After the Implementation of EU Directive 2014/104. In: Marino, S., Biel, Ł., Bajčić, M., Sosoni, V. (eds) Language and Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90905-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90905-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90904-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90905-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)