Advertisement

Phenomenology Imported with EASE

Chapter
  • 268 Downloads
Part of the New Directions in the Philosophy of Science book series (NDPS)

Abstract

In this chapter, the method developed above is applied in a case study of an interdisciplinary approach. The case in question is a study which is part of an ongoing research project, EASE, in which philosophical phenomenology is integrated with more traditional approaches to schizophrenia research. A number of problems with this specific act of integration are pointed out. Indeed, there are a lot of good things to say about the EASE-project. The basic idea is certainly a good one, and it has the potential to significantly improve how we understand and handle schizophrenia. Nevertheless, approach-based analysis reveals considerable epistemic problems related to the specific approach in focus.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Edited by American Psychiatric Association. 3rd ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Edited by American Psychiatric Association. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  5. Andreasen, Nancy C. 2007. DSM and the Death of Phenomenology in America: An Example of Unintended Consequences. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33 (1): 108–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berrios, German E. 1992. Phenomenology, Psychopathology and Jaspers: A Conceptual History. History of Psychiatry 3 (11): 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bortolotti, Lisa. 2010a. Delusions and Other Irrational Beliefs, International Perspectives in Philosophy and Psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2010b. Double Bookkeeping in Delusions: Explaining the Gap between Saying and Doing. In New Waves in the Philosophy of Action, ed. K. Frankish, A. Buckareff, and J. Aguilar. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, Jacob. 1994. The Earth is Round (P < .05). American Psychologist 49 (12): 997–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Everitt, Brian S. 1987. Statistics in Psychiatry. Statistical Science 2 (2): 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fulford, K.W.M., et al. 2006. Oxford Textbook of Philosophy and Psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Goodman, Steven N. 2016. Aligning Statistical and Scientific Reasoning. Science 352 (6290): 1180–1181. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hacking, Ian. 1998. Mad Travelers: Reflections on the Reality of Transient Mental Illnesses. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Healy, Kieran. 2017. Fuck Nuance. Sociological Theory 35 (2): 118–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hvidtfeldt, Rolf. 2011. Conceptual Plasticity—A Sober Constructivist Account of Categorization + Consequences. Master thesis, Philosophy, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2016. Sådan får man et diagnosebarn. VERA—tidsskrift for pædagoger 74: 54–56.Google Scholar
  18. Jaspers, Karl. 1912. Die phänomenologische Forschungsrichtung in der Psychopathologie. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie ix: 391–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 1963. General Psychopathology. Translated by J. Hoenig and M. Hamilton. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 1968. The Phenomenological Approach in Psychopathology. The British Journal of Psychiatry 114 (516): 1313–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kellert, Stephen H. 2009. Borrowed Knowledge: Chaos Theory and the Challange of Learning Across Desciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kitcher, Patricia. 1992. Freud’s Dream: A Complete Interdisciplinary Science of Mind. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2007. Freud’s Interdisciplinary Fiasco. In The Prehistory of Cognitive Science, ed. Andrew Brook, 230–249. Basingstoke, UK; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Kvale, Steinar, and Svend Brinkmann. 2009. Interviews—Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Likert, Rensis. 1932. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140: 1–55.Google Scholar
  26. Medin, Douglas L., et al. 1997. Categorization and Reasoning among Tree Experts: Do All Roads Lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology 32: 49–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Møller, Paul, et al. 2011. Examination of Anomalous Self-experience in First-Episode Psychosis: Interrater Reliability. Psychopathology 44: 386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Møller, Paul, and R. Husby. 2000. The Initial Prodrome in Schizophrenia: Searching for Naturalistic Core Dimensions of Experience and Behavior. Schizophrenia Bulletin 26: 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murphy, Dominic. 2006. Psychiatry in the Scientific Image. UK: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2012. The Folk Epistemology of Delusions Dominic Murphy. Neuroethics 5: 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9125-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nordgaard, Julie, and Josef Parnas. 2012. A Semi Structured, Phenomenologically-Oriented Psychiatric Interview: Descriptive Congruence in Assessing Anomalous Subjective Experience and Mental Status. Clinical Neuropsychiatry 9 (3): 123–128.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2014. Self-disorders and the Schizophrenia Spectrum: A Study of 100 First Hospital Admissions. Schizophrenia Bulletin 40 (6): 1300–1307. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbt239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parnas, Josef. 2000. The Self and Intentionality in the Pre-Psychotic Stages of Schizophrenia. A Phenomenological Study. In Exploring the Self, ed. Dan Zahavi, 115–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parnas, Josef, et al. 1998. Self-experience in the Prodromal Phases of Schizophrenia. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research 6: 97–106.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2005. EASE: Examination of Anomalous Self-experience. Psychopathology 38: 236–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———. 2011. Self-experience in the Early Phases of Schizophrenia: 5-Year Follow-Up of the Copenhagen Prodromal Study. World Psychiatry 10: 200–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2013. Rediscovering Psychopathology: The Epistemology and Phenomenology of the Psychiatric Object. Schizophrenia Bulletin 39 (2): 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parnas, Josef, and Dan Zahavi. 2002. The Role of Phenomenology in Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification. In Psychiatric Diagnosis and Classification, ed. Mario Maj, Wolfgang Gaebel, Juan Jose López-Ibor, and Norman Sartorius. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
  39. Parnas, Josef, and Pierre Bovet. 2014. Psychiatry Made Easy: Operation(al)ism and Some of Its Consequences. In Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of Historical Change, ed. Kenneth S. Kendler and Josef Parnas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Phillips, Lisa J., et al. 2005. Prepsychotic Phase of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities. The British Journal of Psychiatry 187 (48): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.187.48.s33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raballo, Andrea, and Josef Parnas. 2011. The Silent Side of the Spectrum: Schizotypy and the Schizotaxic Self. Schizophrenia Bulletin 37 (5): 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbq008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saha, Sukanta, et al. 2007. A Systematic Review of Mortality in Schizophrenia: Is the Differential Mortality Gap Worsening Over Time? Archives of General Psychiatry 64 (10): 1123–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sass, Louis A. 2013. Jaspers, Phenomenology, and the ‘Ontological Difference’. In One Century of Karl Jaspers’ General Psychopathology, ed. Giovanni Stanghellini and Thomas Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2014. Delusion and Double Book-Keeping. In Karl Jaspers’ Philosophy and Psychopathology, ed. Thomas Fuchs, Thiemo Breyer, and Christoph Mundt, 125–148. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sass, Louis A., and Josef Parnas. 2003. Schizophrenia, Consciousness, and the Self. Schizophrenia Bulletin 29 (3): 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simmons, Joseph P., et al. 2011. False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science 22: 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simonsohn, Uri, et al. 2014. P-Curve: A Key to the File-Drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143 (2): 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, David W. 2013. Phenomenology. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Ed.), ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/phenomenology/.
  49. Tandon, Rajiv, et al. 2013. Definition and Description of Schizophrenia in the DSM-5. Schizophrenia Research 150 (1): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Webb, L., et al. 1981. DSM-Ill Training Guide for Use with the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagrostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  51. Weisberg, Deena Skolnick, et al. 2008. The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (3): 470–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Health Organization. 1992. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  53. Zahavi, Dan. 2005. Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating First Person Perspective. Cambrigde, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations