Advertisement

Homo Socialis: The Road Ahead

  • Dirk HelbingEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

When I started the publication project with Herbert Gintis on the “homo socialis” (Gintis and Helbing 2015 ), the most important motive for me was to trigger a scientific debate. So, from my perspective, our joint paper on the “homo socialis” is not to be seen as an end point or eternal truth, but as the starting point of a new theory for socio-economic systems. In this comment, I will expand on my paper with Herbert Gintis, and I will use the opportunity to present some further thoughts and materials.

Keywords

Homosociality Herbert Gintis Networked Minds Representative Agent Model Other-regarding Preferences 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author acknowledges support by the ERC Advanced Investigator Grant ‘Momentum’ (Grant No. 324247).

References

  1. Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G., Helbing, D.: FuturICT and social sciences: Big data, big thinking. Z. Soziol. 40(5), 412–413 (2011). http://www.soms.ethz.ch/research/pub/ZfS_futureICT_social_sciencesGoogle Scholar
  2. Eckel, C., Sell, J.: Searching for “Homo Socialis:” A comment on Gintis and Helbing. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 61–66 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 17, 124–129 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., Fehr, E.: Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71(3), 397–404 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frey, S., Goldstone, R.L.: Cyclic game dynamics driven by iterated reasoning. PLoS ONE 8(2), e56416 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gallegati, M.: From the homo economicus to the homo socialis. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 67–76 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. Gallegati, M., Kirman, A.: Beyond the Representative Agent. Elgar, Cheltenham (1999)Google Scholar
  8. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P.M., The ABC Team: Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D.: Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gintis, H.: Game Theory Evolving. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Gintis, H., Helbing, D.: Homo socialis: An analytical core for sociological theory. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 1–59 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. Golder, S.A., Macy, M.W.: Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep and daylength across diverse cultures. Science. 333, 1878–1881 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstone, R.: Homo socialis and homo sapiens. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 77–87 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. Grund, T., Waloszek, C., Helbing, D.: How natural selection can create both self- and other-regarding preferences, and networked minds. Sci. Rep. 2, 1480 (2013). http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130319/srep01480/full/srep01480.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haken, H.: Synergetics. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  16. Hechter, M.: Why economists should pay heed to sociology. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 89–92 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. Helbing, D.: A mathematical model for behavioral changes by pair interactions. In: Haag, G., Mueller, U., Troitzsch, K. G. (eds.) Economic Evolution and Demographic Change. Formal Models in Social Sciences, pp 330–348. Springer, Berlin, also see http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2413177 for the initial formulation in 1990. http://www.soms.ethz.ch/research/pub/pairinteractions.pdf (1992)
  18. Helbing, D.: Quantitative Sociodynamics. Stochastic Methods and Models of Social Interaction Processes. Kluwer Academics, Dordrecht (1995). 2nd edition: Springer, Berlin (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11546-2Google Scholar
  19. Helbing, D.: Dynamic decision behavior and optimal guidance through information services: Models and experiments. In: Schreckenberg, M., Selten, R. (eds.) Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks, pp. 47–95. Springer, Berlin (2004). http://www.santafe.edu/research/working-papers/abstract/9268ffd21afbd598b22f9695a9e15c34/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helbing, D.: Economics 2.0: The natural step towards a self-regulating, participatory market society. Evol. Inst. Econ. Rev. 10(1), 3–41 (2013a). http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.4078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helbing, D.: Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature 497, 51–59 (2013b). http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v497/n7447/full/nature12047.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helbing, D., Balietti, S.: Fundamental and real-world challenges in economics. Culture 76(9–10), 399–417 (2010). http://www.saha.ac.in/cmp/camcs/Sci_Cul_091010/17%20Dirk%20Helbing.pdfGoogle Scholar
  23. Helbing, D., Johansson, A.: Cooperation, norms, and revolutions: A unified game-theoretical approach. PLoS ONE 5(10), e12530 (2010). http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0012530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helbing, D., Kirman, A.: Rethinking economics using complexity theory. Real-World Econ. Rev. 64, 23–52 (2013). http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue64/HelbingKirman64.pdfGoogle Scholar
  25. Helbing, D., Lämmer, S.: Supply and production networks: From the bullwhip effect to business cycles. In: Armbruster, D., Mikhailov, A.S., Kaneko, K. (eds.) Networks of Interacting Machines: Production Organization in Complex Industrial Systems and Biological Cells, pp. 33–66. World Scientific, Singapore (2005). http://www.worldscibooks.com/engineering/5938.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helbing, D., Yu, W.: The future of social experimenting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (PNAS). 107(12), 5265–5266 (2010). http://www.pnas.org/content/107/12/5265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helbing, D., Schönhof, M., Stark, H.-U., Holyst, J.A.: How individuals learn to take turns: Emergence of alternating cooperation in a congestion game and the prisoner’s dilemma. Adv. Complex Syst. 8, 87–116 (2005a). http://www.worldscinet.com/acs/08/0801/S0219525905000361.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helbing, D., Treiber, M., Saam, N.J.: Analytical investigation of innovation dynamics considering stochasticity in the evaluation of fitness. Phys. Rev. E. 71, 067101 (2005b). http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PLEEE8000071000006067101000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M., Szabó, G.: Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6(4), e1000758 (2010). http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hidalgo, C.A., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A.-L., Hausmann, R.: The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317, 482–487 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodgson, G.M.: A Trojan horse for sociology? Preferences versus evolution and morality. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 93–112 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. Isaac, A.G.: Comment on “Homo Socialis: An analytical core for sociological theory”. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 113–121 (2015)Google Scholar
  33. Lämmer, S., Helbing, D.: Self-control of traffic lights and vehicle flows in urban road networks. JSTAT. P04019 (2008). http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1742-5468/2008/04/P04019
  34. Lazer, D., et al.: Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science 323, 721–723 (2009). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=19197046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis, P.: An analytical core for sociology: A complex, Hayekian analysis. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 123–146 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. Lindenberg, S.: The third speed: Flexible activation and its link to self-regulation. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 147–160 (2015)Google Scholar
  37. Macy, M.W.: Big theory: A Trojan horse for economics? Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 161–166 (2015)Google Scholar
  38. Mäs, M., Helbing, D.: Random deviations improve micro-macro predictions. An empirical test. Sociol. Methods Res. 1, 31 (2017)Google Scholar
  39. McFadden, D.: Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.) Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105–142. Academic, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  40. Nowak, A., Andersen, J., Borkowski, W.: Dynamics of socio-economic systems: Attractors, rationality, and meaning. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 167–173 (2015)Google Scholar
  41. Ormerod, P.: A comment on Gintis and Helbing “Homo Socialis: An analytical core for sociological theory”. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 175–182 (2015)Google Scholar
  42. Page, S.E.: The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2008)Google Scholar
  43. Preis, T., Kenett, D.Y., Stanley, H.E., Helbing, D., Ben-Jacob, E.: Quantifying the behavior of stock correlations under market stress. Sci Rep. 2, 752 (2012). http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/121018/srep00752/full/srep00752.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schich, M., Song, C., Ahn, Y.-Y., Mirsky, A., Martino, M., Barabasi, A.-L., Helbing, D.: A network framework of cultural history. Science 345, 558–562 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schweitzer, F., Fagiolo, G., Sornette, D., Vega-Redondo, F., Vespignani, A., White, D.R.: Economics networks: The new challenges. Science 325, 422–425 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, V.L.: Adam Smith: Homo socialis, yes; social preferences, no; reciprocity was to be explained. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 183–193 (2015)Google Scholar
  47. Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N., Barabasi, L.A.: Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 327, 1018–1021 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weibull, J.W.: Evolutionary Game Theory. MIT Press, Boston, MA (1997)Google Scholar
  49. Weidlich, W.: Sociodynamics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)Google Scholar
  50. Winter, F., Rauhut, H., Helbing, D.: How norms can generate conflict: an experiment on the failure of cooperative micro-motives on the macro-level. Soc Forces. 90(3), 919–946 (2012). http://sf.oxfordjournals.org/content/90/3/919.full?sid=57731ded-53ef-4ed2-92fd-1121f08b5427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Witt, U.: Sociology and the imperialism of economics. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 195–202 (2015)Google Scholar
  52. Wolpert, D.: The gaping holes in social science. Rev. Behav. Econ. 2, 203–210 (2015)Google Scholar
  53. Young, H.P.: The evolution of conventions. Econometrica 61(1), 57–84 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ETH ZurichZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.TU DelftDelftNetherlands
  3. 3.Complexity Science HubViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations