Introduction: A Posthuman Objective

  • Ben Murnane


Murnane presents a concise version of his book’s central philosophical discussion: the ways in which posthumanism, and Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism, can be considered in tandem. In Rand, the role of the mind as man’s key asset—indeed, essence—is foregrounded. A similar belief in the mind as human essence underlies much posthumanist thought. Moreover, Rand’s system is marked by an intellectual investment in technology, an assertion that technological progress is at the heart of humanity’s worth. Her descriptions of technological creations as the physical embodiments of human thought, can be seen as a precursor to posthumanist ideas of the “self” as not necessarily limited to the organic body. For these reasons and others elaborated here, Objectivism can be understood as supporting a posthuman vision.


  1. Ayn Rand Institute. 2018. “ARI Gives Away Its Four-Millionth Free Book.” Voices for Reason (blog). February 14.
  2. Burns, Jennifer. 2009. Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Gladstein, Mimi Reisel. 2003. “Ayn Rand in the Scholarly Literature III: Ayn Rand Literary Criticism.” Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 4, no. 2 (Spring): 373–94.
  4. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayles, N. Katherine. 2003. “Afterword: The Human in the Posthuman.” Cultural Critique, no. 53 (Winter): 134–37. Scholar
  6. Heller, Anne C. 2009. Ayn Rand and the World She Made. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  7. Hourigan, Niamh. 2012. Interview by John Murray. John Murray Show. RTÉ Radio 1, August 21.Google Scholar
  8. Hughes, James. 2004. Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future. Cambridge, MA: Westview.Google Scholar
  9. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1993. “Note on the Meaning of ‘Post-.’” In Postmodernism: A Reader, edited by Thomas Docherty, 47–50. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  10. Mayhew, Robert, ed. 2012. Essays on Ayn Rand’s “We the Living”, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  11. Mazlish, Bruce. 1993. The Fourth Discontinuity: The Co-Evolution of Humans and Machines. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Moravec, Hans. 1988. Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rand, Ayn. 1999. Journals of Ayn Rand. Edited by David Harriman. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  14. Rand, Ayn. 2005. Anthem. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
  15. Rand, Ayn. 2007. Atlas Shrugged. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Rand, Ayn. 2007. The Fountainhead. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Rush. 2112. 1997. Mercury/Anthem 534 626–2. Compact disc. Originally released in 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Salmieri, Gregory. 2016. “An Introduction to the Study of Ayn Rand.” In A Companion to Ayn Rand, edited by Allan Gotthelf and Gregory Salmieri, 3–21. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Kindle.Google Scholar
  19. Sciabarra, Chris Matthew. 2004. “The Illustrated Rand.” Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 6, no. 1 (Fall): 1–20.
  20. Warwick, Kevin. 2001. “A Cyborg Life for Me.” In What Is It to Be Human? What Science Can and Cannot Tell Us, by Kenan Malik, Maggie Gee, Norman Levitt, Anthony O’Hear, Matt Ridley, Kiernan Ryan, and Kevin Warwick, 42–47. London: Academy of Ideas.Google Scholar
  21. Warwick, Kevin, M. Gasson, B. Hutt, I. Goodhew, P. Kyberd, H. Schulzrinne, and X. Wu. 2004. “Thought Communication and Control: A First Step Using Radiotelegraphy.” IEE Proceedings—Communications 151: 185–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolfe, Alan. 2012. “The Ridiculous Rise of Ayn Rand.” The Conversation (blog), Chronicle of Higher Education. August 19.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WicklowIreland

Personalised recommendations