Abstract
One of Ian C. Jarvie’s most interesting contributions is his discussion of the thinking of Karl Popper and Michael Polanyi on the nature and workings of the scientific community and their relation to politics (Philosophy of Science 68(4): 545–564, 2001). The self-image these thinkers contributed to still lingers, but their accounts capture a historical moment that has passed and was idealized even when they were written. In this chapter, I examine this tradition and identify the central themes which dominated this literature and ask the question of how this history is relevant today. The answer will perhaps be surprising: despite the fact that the Left of the past held positions that are the opposites of the positions of the present participatory Left, the considerations that motivated the older Left remain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexopoulos, Golfo. 2017. Illness and Inhumanity in Stalin’s Gulag. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bernal, John D. 1939. The Social Function of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buckle, Henry Thomas. 1924. History of Civilization in England. 2nd ed. New York and London: D. Appleton and Company.
Bukharin, Nikolai Ivanovich. 1969 [1921]. Historical Materialism: A System of Sociology. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Accessed April 10, 2017. https://www.marxists.org/archive/bukharin/works/1921/histmat/intro.htm.
Comte, Auguste. 1864. Cours de philosophie positive [1830–42]. Paris: Bachelier.
Conant, James B. 1947. On Understanding Science: An Historical Approach. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Condorcet, Marie Jean Antoine Nicolas Cariat, marquis de. 1976 [1793]. Fragment on the New Atlantis, or Combined Efforts of the Human Species for the Advancement of Science. In Condorcet: Selected Writings, ed. Keith M. Baker, 283–300. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Co.
Hogben, Lancelot. 1957. Statistical Theory: The Relationship of Probability, Credibility and Error. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Huxley, Julian. 1932. A Scientist among the Soviets. New York: Harper & Bothers Publishers.
Jarvie, Ian C. 2001. Science in a Democratic Republic. Philosophy of Science 68 (4): 545–564.
Kitcher, Phillip. 2001. Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mill, John Stuart. 1978 [1859]. On Liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.
Pearson, Karl. 1888. The Ethic of Free Thought: A Selection of Essays and Lectures. London: T. Fisher Unwin.
———. 1905. National Life: From the Standpoint of Science. London: Adam and Charles Black.
———. 1937 [1892]. The Grammar of Science. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.
Polanyi, Michael. 1951. The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Porter, Theodore. 2004. Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stark, Johannes. 1938. The Pragmatic and the Dogmatic Spirit in Physics. Nature 1 (141): 770–772. First published as ‘Weisse Juden’ in der Wissenschaft. Das Schwarze Korps, 15 July 1937.
Turner, Stephen. 2003. The Third Science War. Social Studies of Science 33 (4): 581–611.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, S. (2019). The Political Philosophy of Science in Historical Perspective: The Road Through Popper and Polanyi to the Present. In: Sassower, R., Laor, N. (eds) The Impact of Critical Rationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90825-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90826-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)