Abstract
Hugh Everett’s “Universal Wave Theory Formulation of Quantum Mechanics” (1957), though endorsed and promoted by his mentor John Wheeler, was dismissed by the mainstream in quantum mechanics. Why was it sidelined by those who endorsed the Copenhagen interpretation and John von Neumann’s approach to the famous measurement problem? Everett’s theory was taken up later by Bryce DeWitt under an interpretation, the many worlds universe theory, that is not actually how Everett interpreted his own formulation. I argue that by looking at science as a social institution according to Ian C. Jarvie’s critique of Karl Popper’s view of science as a “Republic,” we can see how Everett was sidelined: external pressures of the Cold War and McCarthy and internal pressures of Big Science and the “military-industrial complex.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agassi, Joseph, and Abraham Meidan. 2016. Beg to Differ: The Logic of Disputes and Argumentation. Netherland: Springer.
Barrett, Jeffrey A. 1999. The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, Jeffrey A., and Peter Byrne, eds. 2012. The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955–1980 with Commentary. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bell, John S. 2004. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bohm, David. 1957. Remarks Made in the Discussion During the Sixth Session. In Observation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics: With Special Reference to Quantum Mechanics, ed. Stephan Körner and M. H. L. Pryce, 171–186. Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium of the Colston Research Society held in the University of Bristol, April 1–4, 1957. New York: Dover Publications.
Bohm, David, and Basil J. Hiley. 1993. The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. New York: Routledge.
Byrne, Peter. 2010. The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett III: Multiple Universes, Mutual Assured Destruction, and the Meltdown of a Nuclear Family. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deutsch, David. 1997. The Fabric of Reality. London: Penguin Press.
———. 2016. The Logic of Experimental Tests, Particularly of Everettian Quantum Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55: 24–33.
DeWitt, Bryce S. 1970. Quantum Mechanics and Reality. Physics Today 23 (9): 30.
Everett, Hugh, III. 1957a. Recursive Games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games, ed. H.W. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, 47–87. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 1957b [1973]. The Theory of the Universal Wave Function. In The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, ed. Bryce S. DeWitt and Neill Graham. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 1957c. ‘Relative State’ Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 29: 454–462.
van Fraassen, Bas C. 1991. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Freire, Olival, Jr. 2005. Science and Exile: David Bohm, the Cold War, and a New Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (1): 1–34.
Heisenberg, Werner. 1958a. The Physicist’s Conception of Nature, Hutchinson Scientific and Technical. London: Hutchinson.
———. 1958b. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper & Row.
Jarvie, Ian C. 2001. The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper’s Social View of Science, 1935–1945. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
Mermin, N. David. 1998. The Ithaca Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Pramana 51: 549–565.
Neumann, John von. 1955. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Osnaghi, Stefano, Fábio Freitas, and Olival Freire Jr. 2009. The Origin of the Everettian Heresy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40: 97–123.
Popper, Karl R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: G. Routledge & Sons, Ltd.
———. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge & Paul.
———. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
———. 1965 [1963]. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
———. 1982. Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics: From the Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery. Ed. W.W. Bartley, III. London: Hutchinson.
Saunders, Simon, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent, and David Wallace, eds. 2010. Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Shikhovtsev, Eugene. 2003. Biographical Sketch of Hugh Everett, III. Accessed December 24, 2017. http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/everett/everettbio.pdf.
Tegmark, Max. 2004. Parallel Universes. In Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology, and Complexity, ed. J.D. Barrow, P.C.W. Davies, and C.L. Harper, 459–491. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, David. 2012. The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wheeler, John A. 1957. Assessment of Everett’s ‘Relative State’ Formulation of Quantum Theory. Reviews of Modern Physics 29 (3): 463–465.
Whitaker, Andrew. 2006. Einstein, Bohr, and the Quantum Dilemma: From Quantum Theory to Quantum Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wigner, Eugene. 1967. Symmetries and Reflections: Scientific Essays of Eugene P. Wigner. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.
Zurek, Wojciech H. 2004. Quantum Darwinism and Invariance. In Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology, and Complexity, ed. J.D. Barrow, P.C.W. Davies, and C.L. Harper, 121–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richmond, S. (2019). The Tyranny in Science: The Case of Hugh Everett’s Universal Wave Theory Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Sassower, R., Laor, N. (eds) The Impact of Critical Rationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90825-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90826-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)