Skip to main content

Jarvie on Rationality and Cultural Relativism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Impact of Critical Rationalism

Abstract

Ian C. Jarvie is widely known for his contribution to the “rationality debate” in philosophy of the social sciences. In this chapter, I shall critically examine his view of rationality and rebuttal of cultural relativism. First, I shall discuss his view of rationality while paying attention to its relation to Karl Popper’s critical rationalism. Second, I shall scrutinize Jarvie’s criticism of cultural relativism, after his debate with Peter Winch. Jarvie proposes a middle way to avoid ethnocentrism and cultural relativism by examining Melville Herskovits’s cultural relativism and its relation to the American Anthropological Association’s “Statement on Human Rights.” Third, I shall examine Jarvie’s social and institutional view of rationality by discussing his ideas of weak absolutism, workshop rationality, and social institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agassi, Joseph. 1960. Methodological Individualism. British Journal of Sociology 11 (3): 244–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. Institutional Individualism. British Journal of Sociology 26 (2): 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Anthropological Association (AAA). 1947. Statement on Human Rights. American Anthropologist 49 (4): 539–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, William W. 1968. Theories of Demarcation Between Science and Metaphysics. In Problems in the Philosophy of Science, ed. Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 40–64; reply: 102–119. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984 [1962]. The Retreat to Commitment. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidney, David. 1953. The Concept of Value in Modern Anthropology. In Anthropology Today: An Encyclopedic Inventory, ed. Alfred L. Kroeber, 682–699. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. 1911 [1637]. Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason and Seeking for Truth in the Sciences. In The Philosophical Works of Descartes. Translated by Elizabeth S. Haldane and George R. T. Ross, vol. 1, 79–130. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, Karen. 2001. From Skepticism to Embrace: Human Rights and the American Anthropological Association from 1947–1999. Human Rights Quarterly 23 (3): 536–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guala, Francesco. 2016. Understanding Institutions: The Science and Philosophy of Living Together. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits, Melville J. 1972. Cultural Relativism: Perspectives in Cultural Pluralism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, Ian C. 1970. Understanding and Explanation in Sociology and Social Anthropology. In Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences, ed. Robert Borger and Frank Cioffi, 231–248; reply: 260–269. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1972. Concepts and Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. Functionalism. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1983. Rationality and Relativism. British Journal of Sociology 34 (1): 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. Rationality and Relativism: In Search of a Philosophy and History of Anthropology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Situational Logic and Its Reception. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3): 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper’s Social View of Science, 1935–1945. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Fuller on Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (2): 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Workshop Rationality, Dogmatism, and Models of the Mind. In The Mind as a Scientific Object: Between Brain and Culture, ed. Christina E. Erneling and David M. Johnson, 471–486. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Relativism and Historicism. In Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology, ed. Stephen P. Turner and Mark W. Risjord, 553–589. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, Ian C., and Joseph Agassi. 1979. The Rationality of Dogmatism. In Rationality Today, ed. Theodore F. Geraets, 353–362. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1940. What Is Dialectic? Mind 49: 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1944. The Poverty of Historicism, II: A Criticism of Historicist Methods. Economica 11 (43): 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 2 vols. London: George Routledge and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1949. Towards a Rational Theory of Tradition. In The Rationalist Annual 1949, ed. Frederick Watts, 36–55. London: Watts and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. Autobiography of Karl Popper. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. Paul A. Schilpp, vol. 1, 1–181. La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Models, Instruments, and Truth: The Status of the Rationality Principle in the Social Sciences. In The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality, ed. Mark A. Notturno, 154–184. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, Jeremy. 2017. Popper’s Influence on the Social Sciences. In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Social Science, ed. Lee McIntyre and Alex Rosenberg, 55–64. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John. 2006. How Do Institutions Steer Events? An Inquiry into the Limits and Possibilities of Rational Thought and Action. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. Understanding a Primitive Society. American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4): 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. Comment [on Jarvie 1970]. In Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences, ed. Robert Borger and Frank Cioffi, 249–259. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, John O. 1970. Situational Individualism and the Emergent Group-Properties. In Explanation in the Behavioural Sciences, ed. Robert Borger and Frank Cioffi, 271–296; reply: 306–311. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, Kei. 2014. Rationality and Cultural Interpretivism: A Critical Assessment of Failed Solutions. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Yoshida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yoshida, K. (2019). Jarvie on Rationality and Cultural Relativism. In: Sassower, R., Laor, N. (eds) The Impact of Critical Rationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90825-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90826-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics