A Reflection on Active House in Warm Climates

  • Lone Feifer
  • Marco Imperadori
  • Graziano Salvalai
  • Arianna Brambilla
  • Federica Brunone
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

Active House represents the next generation of sustainable buildings, which have a positive balance between benefits and resources consumed. In this chapter, the adaptation of the model for warm climates is explained. The aim is to investigate how the standard fits the Mediterranean region and how it can be used to design an Active House in hot climate. A sensitivity analysis on design parameters is performed to investigate their influence on energy consumption and thermal comfort provided according to the Specifications. RhOME, an outstanding example of efficient and sustainable design, is used to validate the analysis.

Keywords

Active house Sustainability AH in hot climates Energy efficiency Thermal comfort Design models Model validation 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Brambilla A (2014) Mediterranean active house: analysis of climate and users impact on energy and indoor comfort in the new efficiency standard for sustainable buildings. Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di MilanoGoogle Scholar
  2. Erell E, Portnov BA, Etzion Y (2003) Mapping the potential for climate-conscious design of buildings. Building Environ 38:271–281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Rubel F, Kottek M (2010) Observed and projected climate shifts 1901–2100 depicted by world maps of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification, Meteorol 19:135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mimmack GM, Mason SJ, Galpin JS (2001) Choice of distance matrices in cluster analysis: defining regions. J ClimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Miller W, Buys L (2012) Anatomy of a sub-tropical positive energy home PEH (2012) Solar energy 86:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nicol JF, Pagliano L (2007) Allowing for thermal comfort in free-running buildings in the new European Standard EN15251. In: Conference on building low energy cooling and advanced ventilation technologies in the 21st century, CreteGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker N, Standeven M (1996) Thermal comfort in free running buildings. Energy Build 23:175–182Google Scholar
  8. Voss K, Sartori I, Lollin R (2012) Nearly-zero, net zero and plus energy buildings. How definitions & regulations affect the solutions. REHVA J 6(49):23–27Google Scholar
  9. Sartori I, Candanedo J, Geier S, Lollini R, Garde F, Athienitis A, Pagliano L (2010) Comfort and energy efficiency recommendations for net zero energy buildings. In: International Conference on solar heating, cooling and buildings, GrazGoogle Scholar
  10. de Graca GC, Augusto A, Lerer MM (2012) Solar powered net zero energy houses for southern Europe: feasibility study. Solar Energy 86:634–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan K, Saltelli A, Tarantola S (1997) Sensitivity analysis of model output: variance based methods make the difference. Winter Simulation Conference, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  12. Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Saltelli A (2010) Enhancing Morris method. Joint Research Centre, IspraGoogle Scholar
  13. Heiselberg PK, Brohus H, Hesselholt A, Rasmussen E, Seinre E, Thomas S (2009) Application of sensitivity analysis in design of sustainable buildings. Renewable Energy 34(9):2030–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morris MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33(2):161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Campolongo F (2000) Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modeling. Stat Sci 5(4):377–395Google Scholar
  16. Brambilla A, Salvalai G, Tonelli C, Imperadori M (2017) Comfort analysis applied to the international standard active house: the case of RhOME, the winning prototype of Solar Decathlon 2014. J Build Eng 12:210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Hoof J, Hensen JL (2007) Quantifying the relevance of adaptive thermal comfortmodels in moderate thermal climate zones. Build Environ 42(1):156–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (2014) Climate change synthesis report. http://www.ipcc.ch/. Accessed 18 May 2016

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lone Feifer
    • 1
  • Marco Imperadori
    • 2
  • Graziano Salvalai
    • 2
  • Arianna Brambilla
    • 3
  • Federica Brunone
    • 2
  1. 1.Active House AllianceBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of ABCPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.School of Architecture, Design and PlanningUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations