Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rheumatology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bone SPECT/CT of Ankle and Foot

  • 436 Accesses

Abstract

Predisposition:

  • H/F ≤ 1

  • Age > 45 years

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cotten A. Imagerie musculosquelettique. Pathologies générales. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Elsevier Masson; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gelber AC. In the clinic. Osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161(1):ITC1-16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Drapé J-L, Guerini H. Imagerie du pied et de la cheville. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Elsevier-Masson; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Harris CL, Klein MA, O’Dell JR, Hooper MM, et al. Glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and the two in combination for painful knee osteoarthritis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(8):795–808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knupp M, Pagenstert GI, Barg A, Bolliger L, Easley ME, Hintermann B. SPECT-CT compared with conventional imaging modalities for the assessment of the varus and valgus malaligned hindfoot. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(11):1461–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barg A, Pagenstert GI, Horisberger M, Paul J, Gloyer M, Henninger HB, et al. Supramalleolar osteotomies for degenerative joint disease of the ankle joint: indication, technique and results. Int Orthop. 2013;37(9):1683–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh VK, Javed S, Parthipun A, Sott AH. The diagnostic value of single photon-emission computed tomography bone scans combined with CT (SPECT-CT) in diseases of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(2):80–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Claassen L, Uden T, Ettinger M, Daniilidis K, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Plaass C. Influence on therapeutic decision making of SPECT-CT for different regions of the foot and ankle. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:927576.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kretzschmar M, Wiewiorski M, Rasch H, Jacob AL, Bilecen D, Walter MA, et al. 99mTc-DPD-SPECT/CT predicts the outcome of imaging-guided diagnostic anaesthetic injections: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80(3):e410–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pagenstert GI, Barg A, Leumann AG, Rasch H, Müller-Brand J, Hintermann B, et al. SPECT-CT imaging in degenerative joint disease of the foot and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(9):1191–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim H-R, So Y, Moon S-G, Lee I-S, Lee S-H. Clinical value of (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16(2):212–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dieppe P, Cushnaghan J, Young P, Kirwan J. Prediction of the progression of joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis of the knee by bone scintigraphy. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993;52(8):557–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergeron Y, Leclaire FL. Pathologie médicale de l’appareil locomoteur. Acton Vale, QC, Canada: Edisem; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leemrijse T, Valtin B. Pathologie du pied et de la cheville. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Elsevier Masson; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morvan G, et al. Le pied—monographie de la SIMS 2011. Sauramps Médical: Montpellier; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hérisson C, Aboukrat P. Pathologie du medio-pied. Montpellier: Sauramps Médical; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TWJ. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1094–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(9):1580–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim JY, Cho S-K, Han M, Choi YY, Bae S-C, Sung Y-K. The role of bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis according to the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(2):204–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Orphanet: Arthrite psoriasique [Internet]. [cité 2 juill 2015]. http://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/OC_Exp.php?Lng=FR&Expert=40050.0

  22. Gladman DD, Chandran V. Observational cohort studies: lessons learnt from the University of Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Program. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(1):25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bouysset M, Delmi M, Morvan G. Le pied et cheville de la clinique aux examens complémentaires. Montpellier: Sauramps Médical; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Mease P, Mielants H, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2665–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scarpa R, Cuocolo A, Peluso R, Atteno M, Gisonni P, Iervolino S, et al. Early psoriatic arthritis: the clinical spectrum. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(1):137–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan AL, Tanner SF, Waller ML, Hensor EMA, Burns A, Jeavons AP, et al. High-resolution [18F]fluoride positron emission tomography of the distal interphalangeal joint in psoriatic arthritis—a bone-enthesis-nail complex. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(5):898–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Raza N, Hameed A, Ali MK. Detection of subclinical joint involvement in psoriasis with bone scintigraphy and its response to oral methotrexate. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008;33(1):70–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tan AL, McGonagle D. Psoriatic arthritis: correlation between imaging and pathology. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77(3):206–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gastaldi G, Ruiz J, Borens O. [Charcot osteoarthropathy: don’t miss it!]. Rev Médicale Suisse. 2013;9(389):1212, 1214–20.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Prise en charge du pied diabétique infecté. SPILF, Texte court [Internet]. [cité 1 juill 2015]. http://www.infectiologie.com/site/medias/_documents/consensus/pieddiabetique2006-court.pdf

  31. Khodaee M, Lombardo D, Montgomery LC, Lyon C, Montoya C. Clinical inquiry: what’s the best test for underlying osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot ulcers? J Fam Pract. 2015;64(5):309–10, 321.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Palestro CJ. 18F-FDG and diabetic foot infections: the verdict is... J Nucl Med. 2011;52(7):1009–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Teh J, Berendt T, Lipsky BA. Rational Imaging. Investigating suspected bone infection in the diabetic foot. BMJ. 2009;339:b4690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Malhotra R, Chan CS-Y, Nather A. Osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2014;5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Treglia G, Sadeghi R, Annunziata S, Zakavi SR, Caldarella C, Muoio B, et al. Diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis related to diabetic foot: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Foot (Edinb). 2013;23(4):140–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Masquelet A-C, Collège français des enseignants en chirurgie de la main, Collège national de chirurgie pédiatrique (France). Orthopédie et traumatologie de l’adulte et de l’enfant: enseignement du deuxième cycle des études médicales. Montpellier: Sauramps Médical; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  37. COFER. Rhumatologie. France: Elsevier; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Goebel A. Complex regional pain syndrome in adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50(10):1739–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Borchers AT, Gershwin ME. Complex regional pain syndrome: a comprehensive and critical review. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(3):242–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chronic Foot Pain—American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria 2013 [Internet]. [cité 19 août 2015]. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69424/Narrative/

  41. Algodystrophie ou syndrome douloureux régional complexe de type I [Internet]. [cité 15 juin 2015]. http://mn-net.pagesperso-orange.fr/doc/docos/rhumato/vasculaire/algodystrophie.html

  42. Harden RN, Bruehl S, Stanton-Hicks M, Wilson PR. Proposed new diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Med. 2007;8(4):326–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Harden RN, Bruehl S, Perez RSGM, Birklein F, Marinus J, Maihofner C, et al. Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the “Budapest Criteria”) for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Pain. 2010;150(2):268–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Varenna M, Adami S, Rossini M, Gatti D, Idolazzi L, Zucchi F, et al. Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I with neridronate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(3):534–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Moon JY, Park SY, Kim YC, Lee SC, Nahm FS, Kim JH, et al. Analysis of patterns of three-phase bone scintigraphy for patients with complex regional pain syndrome diagnosed using the proposed research criteria (the “Budapest Criteria”). Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(4):655–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Roddy E, Mallen CD, Doherty M. Gout. BMJ. 2013;347:f5648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Jansen TL, Neogi T, Schumacher HR, Taylor WJ. New classification criteria for gout: a framework for progress. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52(10):1748–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nuclear Physician, Résidence du Parc Clinic, Marseille, France

    Guillaume Chuto, Michel Nicaud & Bruno Puech

  2. Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeon, Juge Clinic, Marseille, France

    Emmanuel Richelme & Christophe Cermolacce

Authors
  1. Guillaume Chuto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emmanuel Richelme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christophe Cermolacce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michel Nicaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bruno Puech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chuto, G., Richelme, E., Cermolacce, C., Nicaud, M., Puech, B. (2018). Rheumatology. In: Bone SPECT/CT of Ankle and Foot. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90811-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90811-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90810-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90811-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation