Abstract
The role played by reciprocity and other intangible assets for the economy, as well as the confirmation of the motivational heterogeneity and moral commitment that underlie them, demonstrate the need to extend the margins of economic rationality in an affective and communicative sense in order to introduce into the information base variables like prosocial emotions , and the values, norms or principles forming part of economic agents ’ conduct and decision-making processes. From the ethical and emotional anchorage proposed through cordial reciprocity , and without ignoring the necessary strategic-technical dimension of economic rationality, the aim of this chapter is to elucidate a suitable proposal for economic rationality to guide and provide information about economic agents’ conduct and decisions in the area of economics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
To learn about the basic aspects of this argument, see Olson (1965).
- 2.
To go further into these reciprocity approaches, see Calvo (2012: 133–166).
- 3.
See Calvo (2012a) for this economic rationality approach study by Ostrom .
- 4.
Accordingly, Ostrom argues that if rationality is interpreted based on the criterion of the largest possible profit, it would be senseless for the economic discourse to marginalize those emotions allowing optimum balances whose performance is far superior to that observed for merely selfishic behaviour (1990, 2000, 2003, 2012).
- 5.
To learn what the Valencia School contributed to discourse ethics , see Cortina (2008: 10–27).
- 6.
For further information about the contributions made by various researchers, see Conill (2006a).
Bibliography
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1998. Teoría de la verdad y ética del discurso. Barcelona: Paidós.
Bowles, Samuel, and Herbert Gintis. 1998. Is equality Passe? Homo Reciprocans and the future of egalitarian politics. Boston Review 23 (6): 1–27.
———. 2003. The origins of human cooperation. In The Genetic and Cultural Origins of Cooperation, ed. P. Hammerstein, 429–444. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———. 2004. Homo Economicus and Zoon Politikon: Behavioral Game Theory and Political Behavior, 1–16. http://www.umass.edu/preferen/gintis/Homo%20Economicus%20and%20Zoon%20Politikon.pdf. Accesed 25 Sept 2017.
———. 2006. Social Preferences, Homo Economicus and Zoon Politikon. In Work of Contextual Political Analysis, ed. Robert E. Goodin and Charles Tilly, 172–186. New York: Oxford University Press.
———. 2011. A Cooperative Species. Human Reciprocity and its Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Calvo, Patrici. 2012. Cooperación y sentimientos morales en el enfoque de racionalidad económica de Elinor Ostrom. Una mirada crítica de la teoría de juegos. In XIX Congrés Valencià de Filosofia, ed. Enric Casaban, 425–441. Valencia: SFPV.
———. 2013. Neuro-racionalidad: heterogeneidad motivacional y compromiso moral. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía 59: 157–170.
Conill, Jesús. 2000a. Globalización y ética económica. Papeles de ética, economía y dirección 5: 1–8.
———. 2000b. Marco ético-económico de la empresa moderna. In La ética de la empresa. Claves para una nueva ética empresarial, ed. Adela Cortina, 51–74. Madrid: Trotta.
———. 2003a. El carácter ético y deliberativo de las éticas aplicadas. In Razón pública y éticas aplicadas. Los caminos de la razón práctica en una sociedad pluralista, ed. Adela Cortina and Domingo García-Marzá, 121–142. Madrid: Tecnos.
———. 2003b. El sentido ético de la economía en tiempos de globalización. Revista de Filosofía 29: 9–15.
———. 2006a. Ética hermenéutica. Crítica desde la facticidad. Madrid: Tecnos.
———. 2006b. Horizontes de Economía Ética. Madrid: Tecnos.
Cortina, Adela. 1990. Ética sin moral. Madrid: Tecnos.
———. 1992. Ética mínima. Madrid: Tecnos.
———. 1993. Ética aplicada y democracia radical. Madrid: Tecnos.
———. 1996. El estatuto de la ética aplicada. Hermenéutica crítica de las actividades humanas. Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 13: 119–134.
———. 2000. Ética empresarial en el contexto de una ética cívica. In La Ética de la empresa. Claves para una nueva Ética empresarial, ed. Adela Cortina, 35–50. Madrid: Trotta.
———. 2003. Ética de la empresa y desarrollo económico. In Construir confianza, ed. Adela Cortina, 39–54. Madrid: Trotta.
———. 2007a. Ethica cordis. Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 37: 113–126.
———. 2007b. Ética de la razón cordial. Educar en la ciudadanía en el siglo XXI. Nobel: Oviedo.
———. 2008. European economic ethics research a diagnosis. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 9 (1): 10–27.
———. 2010. Justicia cordial. Madrid: Trotta.
———. 2013. ¿Para qué sirve realmente… la ética? Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.
———. 2017. Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre. Un desafío para la democracia. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.
Cortina, Adela, and Emilio Martínez. 1996. Ética. Madrid: Akal.
Diccionario de la Lengua Española. 2017. Cordial. http://dle.rae.es/?id=AqyMdg9. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.
García-Marzá, Domingo. 2004. Ética empresarial: del diálogo a la confianza. Madrid: Trotta.
Genovesi, Antonio. 1786. Lecciones de comercio, ó bien de economía civil. Tomo III. Trans. Victorian de Villava. Madrid.
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987 [1981]. Teoría de la acción comunicativa. Vol. 1 & 2. Madrid: Taurus [English version: Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press; Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2 Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press].
———. 1991 [1984]. Escritos sobre moralidad y eticidad. Barcelona: Paidós.
———. 2001. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hugo, Víctor. 1862. Les Misérables. Brussels: A. Lacroix, Verboeckhoven & Ce.
Kant, Immanuel. 2005. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Toronto: Broadview.
Krugman, Paul. 2013, Abril 13. Correlation, causality, and casuistry. The New York Times. https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/18/correlation-causality-and-casuistry/. Accessed 28 Sept 2017.
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Ortega, José y Gasset. 1960 [1929]. The Revolt of the Masses. New York: Norton & Co.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1–22.
———. 2000. Prefacio a la edición en español de Governing de commons. In El Gobierno de los Comunes. La Evolución de las Instituciones de Acción Colectiva, ed. Elinor Ostrom, 9–13. Mexico: Fondo Cultural de Economía.
———. 2003. Toward a behavioral theory linking trust, reciprocity, and reputation. In Trust & Reciprocity. Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research, ed. Elinor Ostrom and James Walker, 19–79. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
———. 2012. Experiments combining communication with punishment options demonstrate how individuals can overcome social dilemmas. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1): 33–34.
Oxford English Dictionary. 2017. Cordial. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/monitor. Accessed 25 Sept 2017.
Panchi, Luis-Augusto. 2004. De ética económica a economía ética. Fundamentos a partir de una racionalidad ético-interpretativa, con una aplicación al caso ecuatoriano. Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala.
Sen, Amartya. 1977. Rational fools. A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. In Frank Hahn and Martin Hollis, ed. Philosophy and public affairs, 317–344. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
———. 1987. On ethics and economy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
———. 2000. Development as freedom. New York: Anchor.
———. 2002. Rationality and freedom. Harvard: Harvard Belknap Press.
———. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Simon, Herbert A. 1955. Behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (1): 99–118.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2012. The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Tomasello, Michael 2010. ¿Por qué cooperamos?. Madrid: Katz. [English vertion: 2009. Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press].
———. 2014a. A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
———. 2014b. The ultra-social animal. European Journal of Social Psychology 44: 187–194.
Tuomela, Raimo. 2007. The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ulrich, Peter. 1993. Bases para una ética económica crítica. Alcalá de Henares: Instituto de Dirección y Organización de Empresas/Universidad de Alcalá.
———. 2008. Ética Económica Integrativa: Fundamentos de una economía al servicio de la vida. Quito: Ediciones Adya-Yala.
Vaish, Amrisha, Malinda Carpenter, and MIchael Tomasello. 2010. Young children selectively avoid helping people with harmful intentions. Child Development 81 (6): 1661–1669.
Warneken, Felix, and Michael Tomasello. 2006. Altruistic helping in human infants and young Chimpanzees. Science 311 (5765): 1301–1303.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Calvo, P. (2018). Cordial Rationality: The Language of Human Cooperation. In: The Cordial Economy - Ethics, Recognition and Reciprocity. Ethical Economy, vol 55. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90784-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90784-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90783-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90784-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)