Cordial Reciprocity: The Ethical Basis of Human Cooperation

  • Patrici Calvo
Chapter
Part of the Ethical Economy book series (SEEP, volume 55)

Abstract

Reciprocity is one of the main challenges for twenty-first-century economic science because of its leading role in specifying and developing human cooperation. Beyond the exchange of equivalents controlled by contracts and guaranteed by Law, reciprocity, in the many forms it takes, allows us to think about the possibility of establishing different types of cooperation among agents to meet the shared objectives that are highly beneficial for them all. However, the various reciprocity approaches do not explain why agents tend to relate to one another when they have no information about the bindable parties’ response capacity. This is mutual recognition of the value that they deserve as people, and of effective and communication capacities so they can feel emotions for themselves and for others, and can use dialogue and reach agreements about the different things in the world to allow the minimum conditions of trust needed to establish and implement those reciprocal behaviours observed by sociobiology and by evolutionary and humanistic economics. This chapter aims to look in-depth at the unconditional and unconditioned reciprocity that underlies this type of mutual recognition, which is cordially constituted, to show the role it plays in the appearance and promotion of behaviours that enable human cooperation in highly competitive contexts like those in economics.

Bibliography

  1. Calvo, Patrici. 2012. Racionalidad económica: aspectos éticos de la reciprocidad. Castellón de la Plana: Serveis de Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2013. Economía civil desde una ética de la razón cordial. CIRIEC. Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa 79: 115–143.Google Scholar
  3. Cortina, Adela. 2007a. Ethica cordis. Isegoría. Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 37: 113–126.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2007b. Ética de la razón cordial. Educar en la ciudadanía en el siglo XXI. Oviedo: Nobel.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2010. Justicia cordial. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2011. Neuroética y Neuropolítica. Sugerencias para la Educación Moral. Madrid: Tecnos.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2012. Neuroética, presente y futuro. In Neurofilosofía práctica, ed. Adela Cortina, 9–38. Granada: Comares.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2013. ¿Para qué sirve realmente… la ética? Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2017. Aporofobia, el rechazo al pobre. Un desafío para la democracia. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.Google Scholar
  10. Damasio, Antonio R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
  12. Diccionario de la Lengua Española. 2017. Reciprocity. http://dle.rae.es/srv/fetch?id=VRiTmmB. Accessed 25 Sept 2017.
  13. Fehr, Ernst, and Simon Gächter. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415 (6868): 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank, Robert H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  15. Gintis, Hebert. 2000. Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2010. Behavioral ethics. In Creating Consilience: Integrating the Sciences and the Humanities (New Directions in Cognitive Science), ed. Edward Slingerlan and Mark Collard, 318–333. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Glimcher, Paul W., Colin F. Camarer, Ernst Fehr, and Russell A. Poldrack, eds. 2009. Neuroeconomics. Decision Making and the Brain. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gould, Richard. 1982. To have and not to have: The ecology of sharing among hunter-gatherers. In Resource managers: North American and Australian Hunter-Gatherers, ed. Nancy M. Williams and Eugene S. Hunn, 69–91. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  19. Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. Justification and application. In Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kosfeld, Michael, Markus Heinrichs, Paul J. Zak, Urs Fischbacher, and Ernst Fehr. 2005. Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435 (1): 637–677.Google Scholar
  21. McCabe, Kevin, Daniel Houser, Lee Ryan, Vernon Smith, and Theodore Trouard. 2001. A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (20): 11832–11835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mediavilla, Daniel. 2015, November 03. Michael Tomasello: “Para mejorar la sociedad no podemos obviar lo negativo de nuestra biología”. El País. https://elpais.com/elpais/2015/10/20/ciencia/1445363532_639418.html
  23. Moussy, Claude. 2008. L’histoire du latin procurare: une “préhistoire” du français procurer? Revista de Estudios Latinos 8: 17–29.Google Scholar
  24. Ohtsuki, Hisashi, Yoh Iwasa, and Martin A. Nowak. 2009. Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment. Nature 457: 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ———. 2003. Toward a behavioral theory linking trust, reciprocity, and reputation. In Trust & Reciprocity. Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research, ed. Elinor Ostrom and James Walker, 19–79. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Oxford English Dictionary. 2017. Reciprocity. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reciprocity. Accessed 25 Sept 2017.
  28. Rockenbach, Bettina, and Manfred Milinski. 2006. The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment. Nature 444: 718–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sahlins, Marshall. 1972. Stone Age Economy. Chicago: Aldine. Atherton.Google Scholar
  30. Sakaiya, Shiro, Yuki Shiraito, Junko Kato, Hiroko Ide, Kensuke Okada, Kouji Takano, and Kenji Kansaku. 2013. Neural correlate of human reciprocity in social interactions. Frontiers in Neuroscience 7 (239): 1–12.Google Scholar
  31. Sennett, Richard. 2003. Respect in a world of inequality. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, Adam. 1793 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: A. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
  33. Strawson, Peter F. 1974. Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  34. Strobel, Alexander, Jan Zimmermann, Anja Schmitz, Martin Reuter, Stefanie Lis, Sabine Windmann, and Peter Kirsch. 2011. Beyond revenge: Neural and genetic bases of altruistic punishment. NeuroImage 54 (1): 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van den Bos, Wouter, Eric van Dijk, Michiel Westenberg, Serge A.R.B. Rombouts, and Eveline A. Crone. 2009. What motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the trust game. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience 4 (3): 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zamagni, Stefano. 2007. L’economia del bene comune. Rome: Città Nuova.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2008. Reciprocity, civil economy, common good. In Pursuing the Common Good: How Solidarity and Subsidiarity Can Work Together, ed. Margaret Archer and Pierpaolo Donati, 467–502. Vatican City: The Pontifician Academy of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2009. Fraternity, gifts and reciprocity in Cáritas in Veritate. Revista Cultural Económica 27 (75–76): 11–29.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2010. Reciprocidad y Fraternidad. El Papel de los Sentimientos en la Economía. In XXI Seminario Étnor de Ética y Economía. ¿Lecciones Aprendidas? Nuevos Caminos para el Crecimiento y Nuevas Formas de Vida Ética en las Estrategias Empresariales del Siglo XXI, ed. Jesús Conill, 55–66. Valencia: Fundación Étnor.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2017. Economics as if ethics mattered. In Economics as a Moral Science. Virtues and Economics, ed. Peter Rona and Zsolnai Laszlo, vol. 1, 21–41. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrici Calvo
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitat Jaume ICastellón de la PlanaSpain

Personalised recommendations