Skip to main content

Robotic Component Separation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Laparoscopic and Robotic Incisional Hernia Repair

Abstract

Component separation techniques to address large ventral hernias have dramatically evolved during the past decade. The touted benefits of a posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR), with its broad adaptability and favorable wound morbidity/recurrence profile, have led to its wide adoption for large, complex, and multiply-recurrent repairs. Concurrent development of the robotic platform and surgeon ingenuity have more recently culminated in the evolution of a minimally invasive TAR technique made practical and adaptable by robotic technology (rTAR). Here, we provide a detailed explanation of the benefits this technique offers in the context of alternative repairs described during the past 30 years. Though the operation is actively evolving, we will also provide a detailed depiction of our approach. While early retrospective reviews tout a shortened length of hospital stay compared to modern open and laparoscopic counterparts in order to justify the increased cost of the robotic platform, improved patient outcomes unique to the approach may ultimately provide enough value to substantiate the vitality of the operative approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stoppa RE. The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias. World J Surg. 1989;13(5):545–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(3):519–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Girotto JA, Chiaramonte M, Menon NG, Singh N, Silverman R, Tufaro AP, et al. Recalcitrant abdominal wall hernias: long-term superiority of autologous tissue repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):106–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez R, Rehnke RD, Ramaswamy A, Smith CD, Clarke JM, Ramshaw BJ. Components separation technique and laparoscopic approach: a review of two evolving strategies for ventral hernia repair. Am Surg. 2005 Jul;71(7):598–605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saulis AS, Dumanian GA. Periumbilical rectus abdominis perforator preservation significantly reduces superficial wound complications in “separation of parts” hernia repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jun;109(7):2275–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe JB, Garza JR, Bowman JL, Rohrich RJ, Strodel WE. Endoscopically assisted “components separation” for closure of abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(2):720–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Switzer NJ, Dykstra MA, Gill RS, Lim S, Lester E, de Gara C, et al. Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(4):787–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Vick CC, Hawn MT. Effect of mesh type and position on subsequent abdominal operations after incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(4):496–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel PP, Love MW, Ewing JA, Warren JA, Cobb WS, Carbonell AM. Risks of subsequent abdominal operations after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(2):823–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carbonell AM, Cobb WS, Chen SM. Posterior components separation during retromuscular hernia repair. Hernia. 2008;12(4):359–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, Palot JP, Verhaeghe PJ, Delattre JF. The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am. 1984;64(2):269–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Majumder A, Miller HJ, Sandoval V, Fayezizadeh M, Wen Y, Novitsky YW. Objective assessment of myofascial medialization after posterior component separation via transversus abdominis muscle Releas. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(4):S57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pauli EM, Wang J, Petro CC, Juza RM, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release successfully addresses recurrent ventral hernias following anterior component separation. Hernia. 2015 Apr;19(2):285–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blatnik JA, Krpata DM, Jacobs MR, Gao Y, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. In vivo analysis of the morphologic characteristics of synthetic mesh to resist MRSA adherence. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(11):2139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carbonell AM, Criss CN, Cobb WS, Novitsky YW, Rosen MJ. Outcomes of synthetic mesh in contaminated ventral hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(6):991–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Criss CN, Petro CC, Krpata DM, Seafler CM, Lai N, Fiutem J, et al. Functional abdominal wall reconstruction improves core physiology and quality-of-life. Surgery. 2014;156(1):176–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Silva GS, Krpata DM, Hicks CW, Criss CN, Gao Y, Rosen MJ, et al. Comparative radiographic analysis of changes in the abdominal wall musculature morphology after open posterior component separation or bridging laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):353–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012;221(6):507–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Novitsky YW, Fayezizadeh M, Majumder A, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB. Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis muscle release and synthetic mesh sublay reinforcement. Ann Surg. 2016;264(2):226–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV. Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3(1):39–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vorst AL, Kaoutzanis C, Carbonell AM, Franz MG. Evolution and advances in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;7(11):293–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Carter SA, Hicks SC, Brahmbhatt R, Liang MK. Recurrence and pseudorecurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: predictors and patient-focused outcomes. Am Surg. 2014 Feb;80(2):138–48.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J, Poi MJ, Novitsky YW. Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using “shoelacing” technique. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(5):1452–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G. Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair in 407 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;190(6):645–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carbonell AM, Harold KL, Mahmutovic AJ, Hassan R, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, et al. Local injection for the treatment of suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am Surg. 2003;69(8):688–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramshaw BJ, Esartia P, Schwab J, Mason EM, Wilson RA, Duncan TD, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg. 1999;65(9):827–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Itani KM, Hur K, Kim LT, Anthony T, Berger DH, Reda D, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2010;145(4):322–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schluender S, Conrad J, Divino CM, Gurland B. Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia with intracorporeal suturing. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(9):1391–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(10):1389–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Allison N, Tieu K, Snyder B, Pigazzi A, Wilson E. Technical feasibility of robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. World J Surg. 2012;36(2):447–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugiyama G, Chivukula S, Chung PJ, Alfonso A. Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair. JSLS. 2015;19(4):1–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Abdalla RZ, Garcia RB, RIDD C, CRPD L, Abdalla BMZ. Procedimento de Rives/Stoppa modificado robô-assistido para correção de hérnias ventrais da linha média. ABCD arq bras cir dig. 2012;25(2):129–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ballacer C, Parra E. Robotic ventral hernia repair. In: Novitsky YW, editor. Hernia surgery: current principles. Cham: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hope WW, Cobb WS, Adrales GL, editors. Textbook of hernia. Cham: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Warren JA, Cobb WS, Ewing JA, Carbonell AM. Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):324–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Belyansky I, Zahiri HR, Park A. Laparoscopic transversus abdominis release, a novel minimally invasive approach to complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Surg Innov. 2016;23(2):134–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Majumder A, Fayezizadeh M, Neupane R, Elliott HL, Novitsky YW. Benefits of multimodal enhanced recovery pathway in patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(6):1106–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, Ballecer CD, Janczyk RJ, Herrera J. et al. Reducing length of stay using a robotic-assisted approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative: Ann Surg; 2017. p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Estey EP. Robotic prostatectomy: the new standard of care or a marketing success? Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3(6):488–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuri W. Novitsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Petro, C.C., Novitsky, Y.W. (2018). Robotic Component Separation. In: LeBlanc, K. (eds) Laparoscopic and Robotic Incisional Hernia Repair. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90737-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90737-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90736-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90737-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics