Advertisement

Conclusions

Chapter
  • 292 Downloads

Abstract

The book is completed with a short conclusion which will consolidate some of the key points made throughout the earlier chapters. Not unlike the history of technological development, insights into the processes that have let speakers understand and produce language as well as tools that mimic these processes have advanced with increasing speed over the last century. In fact, the neuron-network inspired concepts were already described by Quillian in 1961. It is unsurprising that his work is referred to both by those who create digital tools of artificial intelligence and those who try to explain how human language works. Now, in 2018 it is time for AI specialists and linguists to compare notes and see where the other has come up with answers for their problems.

Keywords

Quillian Spreading activation AI Linguistics 

References

  1. Collins, Allan M., and M. Ross Quillian. 1972. Experiments on Semantic Memory and Language Comprehension. In Cognition in Learning and Memory, ed. L.W. Gregg, 117–137. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Meyer, David E., and Roger W. Schvaneveldt. 1971. Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: Evidence of a Dependence Between Retrieval Operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2): 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Neely, James H. 1976. Semantic Priming and Retrieval from Lexical Memory: Evidence for Facilitatory and Inhibitory Processes. Memory and Cognition 4 (5): 648–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Norvig, Peter. 1987. A Unified Theory of Inference for Text Understanding. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  6. Quillian, M. Ross. 1961. The Elements of Human Meaning: A Design for and Understanding Machine. Communications of the ACM 4 (9): 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Quillian, M. Ross. 1969. The Teachable Language Comprehender: A Simulation Program and Theory of Language. Computational Linguistics 12 (8): 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English Language and CultureUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations