Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 94))

Abstract

The surprising ease and efficiency with which human infants, but not kittens or young chimps, acquire language has puzzled scholar for decades. We now have a relatively good empirical and theoretical description of the later stages of language acquisition. However, despite considerable research efforts, the initial stage, i.e. the division of labor between the biologically endowed abilities the infant brings to the task of language acquisition and the learning that takes place on the basis of experience, remains poorly understood. Here, I put forth the hypothesis that prosody might be infants’ first gateway to language, ensuring the link between prenatal and postnatal language experience. I will review evidence suggesting that the prosody of the native language(s) experienced prenatally already shapes infants’ speech perception abilities and their neural correlates. I will also show that prosody plays an important bootstrapping role later during the acquisition of syntax. I propose that these two facts are strongly related, and provide insight about the key role that prosody plays during the early stages of language acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abboub, N., T. Nazzi, and J. Gervain. 2016. Prosodic grouping at birth. Brain and Language 162: 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benavides-Varela, S., and J. Gervain. 2014. Sensitivity to word order at birth: An EEG-NIRS study with newborns. Berlin: Presented at the ICIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, C., and J. Gervain. 2012. Prosodic cues to word order: What level of representation? Frontiers in Language Sciences 3: 451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertoncini, J., and J. Mehler. 1981. Syllables as units in infant speech perception. Infant Behavior and Development 4 (3): 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers-Heinlein, K., T.C. Burns, and J.F. Werker. 2010. The roots of bilingualism in newborns. Psychological Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, A., I. Dautriche, and A. Christophe. 2016. Preschoolers use phrasal prosody online to constrain syntactic analysis. Developmental Science 19 (2): 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., A. Belletti, and L. Rizzi. 2002. On nature and language. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophe, A., E. Dupoux, J. Bertoncini, and J. Mehler. 1994. Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (3): 1570–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCasper, A.J., and W.P. Fifer. 1980. Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science 208 (4448): 1174–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCasper, A.J., J.-P. Lecanuet, M.C. Busnel, and C. Granier-Deferre. 1994. Fetal reactions to recurrent maternal speech. Infant Behavior and Development 17 (2): 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deHaan, M., O. Pascalis, and M.H. Johnson. 2002. Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14 (2): 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene-Lambertz, G., and S. Baillet. 1998. A phonological representation in the infant brain. NeuroReport 9 (8): 1885–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupoux, E., C. Pallier, N. Sebastian, and J. Mehler. 1997. A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language 36 (3): 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimas, P.D., E.R. Siqueland, P.W. Jusczyk, and J. Vigorito. 1971. Speech perception in infants. Science 171 (968): 303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, K.J., R. Otto, R.M. Abrams, J.J. Colle, D.J. Burchfield, and A.J. Peters. 1992. Cochlear microphonics recorded from fetal and newborn sheep. American Journal of Otolaryngology 13 (4): 226–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gervain, J., and J. Mehler. 2010. Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life. Annual Review of Psychology 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gervain, J., and J.F. Werker. 2013. Prosody cues word order in 7-month-old bilingual infants. Nature Communications 4: 1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghitza, O. (2011). Linking speech perception and neurophysiology: Speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraud, A.-L., A. Kleinschmidt, D. Poeppel, T.E. Lund, R.S. Frackowiak, and H. Laufs. 2007. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 56 (6): 1127–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraud, A.L., and D. Poeppel. 2012. Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience 15 (4): 511–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, D.M., I. Berent, S. Benavides-Varela, R.A. Bion, L. Cattarossi, M. Nespor, and J. Mehler. 2014. Language universals at birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (16): 5837–5841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, S.K., W.S. Brown, K.J. Gerhardt, R.M. Abrams, and R.J. Morris. 1994. The perception of speech sounds recorded within the uterus of a pregnant sheep. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96 (4): 2055–2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, B., R. Bijeljac-Babic, B. Herold, J. Weissenborn, and T. Nazzi. 2009. Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French infants. Infant Behavior and Development 32 (3): 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jusczyk, P.W. 1997. The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Pressbka Book Abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisilevsky, B.S., S.M.J. Hains, C.A. Brown, C.T. Lee, B. Cowperthwaite, and S.S. Stutzman. 2009. Fetal sensitivity to properties of maternal speech and language. Infant Behavior and Development 32 (1): 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisilevsky, B.S., S.M.J. Hains, K. Lee, X. Xie, H. Huang, H.H. Ye, … Z. Wang. 2003. Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychological Science 14 (3): 220–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P.K. 2004. Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5 (11): 831–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecanuet, J.P., and C. Granier-Deferre. 1993. Speech stimuli in the fetal environment. In Developmental neurocognition: Speech and face processing in the first year of life, ed. B. de Boysson-Bardies, S. de Schonen, P.W. Jusczyk, P.F. MacNeilage, and J. Morton, 237–248. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecanuet, J.-P., C. Granier-Deferre, H. Cohen, R. LeHouezec, and M.C. Busnel. 1986. Fetal responses to acoustic stimulation depend on heart rate variability pattern, stimulus intensity and repetition. Early Human Development 13: 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecanuet, J.-P., C. Granier-Deferre, and A.-Y. Jacquet. (1992). Decelerative cardiac responsiveness to acoustical stimulation in the near term fetus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44b (3): 279–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mampe, B., A.D. Friederici, A. Christophe, and K. Wermke. 2009. Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology 19 (23): 1994–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, L., K. Byers-Heinlein, J. Gervain, and J.F. Werker. 2011. Language and the newborn brain: Does prenatal language experience shape the neonate neural response to speech? Frontiers in Language Sciences 2: 222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, J., and E. Dupoux. 1994. What infants know: The new cognitive science of early development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, J., P.W. Jusczyk, G. Lambertz, N. Halsted, J. Bertoncini, and C. Amiel-Tison. 1988. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition 29: 143–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, C., R.P. Cooper, and W.P. Fifer. 1993. Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development 16(4), 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J.L., and K. Demuth. 1996. Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazzi, T., J. Bertoncini, and J. Mehler. 1998. Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (3): 756–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, M., M. Shukla, R. van de Vijver, C. Avesani, H. Schraudolf, and C. Donati. 2008. Different phrasal prominence realization in VO and OV languages. Lingue E Linguaggio 7 (2): 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, M., and I. Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology, vol. 28. Dordrecht, Holland; Riverton, N.J., U.S.A.: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascalis, O., M. deHaan, and C.A. Nelson. 2002. Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science 296 (5571): 1321–1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pena, M., A. Maki, D. Kovacic, G. Dehaene-Lambertz, H. Koizumi, F. Bouquet, and J. Mehler. 2003. Sounds and silence: An optical topography study of language recognition at birth. PNAS 100 (20): 11702–11705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. 1984. Language learnability and language development, vol. 7. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F., M.D. Hauser, C. Miller, D. Morris, and J. Mehler. 2000. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Science 288 (5464): 349–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F., M. Nespor, and J. Mehler. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73 (3): 265–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansavini, A., J. Bertoncini, and G. Giovanelli. 1997. Newborns discriminate the rhythm of multisyllabic stressed words. Developmental Psychology 33 (1): 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, H., Y. Hirabayashi, H. Tsubokura, M. Kanai, T. Ashida, I. Konishi, and A. Maki. 2012. Cerebral hemodynamics in newborn infants exposed to speech sounds: A whole-head optical topography study. Human Brain Mapping 33 (9): 2092–2103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. 1986. On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology 3 (01): 371–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, R., J.F. Werker, and J.L. Morgan. 1999. Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition 72 (2): B11–B21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, M., K.S. White, and R.N. Aslin. 2011. Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (15): 6038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vouloumanos, A., M.D. Hauser, J.F. Werker, and A. Martin. 2010. The tuning of human neonates’ preference for speech. Child Development 81 (2): 517–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vouloumanos, A., and J.F. Werker. 2007. Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science 10 (2): 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werker, J.F., and R.C. Tees. 1984. Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7 (1): 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judit Gervain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gervain, J. (2018). Gateway to Language: The Perception of Prosody at Birth. In: Bartos, H., den Dikken, M., Bánréti, Z., Váradi, T. (eds) Boundaries Crossed, at the Interfaces of Morphosyntax, Phonology, Pragmatics and Semantics. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 94. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90710-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90709-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90710-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics