Skip to main content

Medicalized Screens from the Cold War to the Social Web

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Popular Culture and Biomedicine
  • 571 Accesses

Abstract

The discovery of x-rays in the late nineteenth century made visual analysis of medicalized screens central to the practice of medicine. Until recently, however, medicine’s visual culture was defined by two distinct and separate types of screens: clinical-facing screens, displaying images to doctors, and consumer-facing screens, displaying images to the general public. The explosion of digital health technologies in the early twenty-first century has challenged this division, as well as the underlying premise that the content on these screens should be segmented according to audience, with access to clinical screens restricted to credentialed medical professionals. By opening up access to formerly closed sources of information, the social web has become a dynamic force in the convergence of clinical- and consumer-facing screens. In twenty-first century telehealth applications and entertainment television, screen-based media emphasize the aesthetic of realism to accomplish their effects through multi-platform, transmedia storytelling. By examining how the concept of objectivity functions across clinical and non-clinical spaces, this essay will explain how the evolution of medicalized screens since the middle of the twentieth century has transformed the production of medical knowledge and redefined the role of technology in popular representations of healthcare. Through an archaeology of medical media from the mid-twentieth century to the present, the essay will show that the source of medical realism and objectivity has shifted from the hospital setting to the screen itself, thereby reducing the human dimensions of the patient to digital signals and decontextualized data points.

Parts of this essay have been adapted from Kirsten Ostherr, Medical Visions: Producing the Patient through Film, Television and Imaging Technologies, Oxford University Press (c) 2014.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Viewer comments posted online after August 15, 2010 episode. http://bostonmed.abcnews.go.com/discuss/episode/. The ABC Boston Med website is now extinct, but two sample pages of viewer postings have been archived and can be accessed through the Internet Archive “Wayback Machine,” accessed May 10, 2012, http://wayback.archive.org/web/20100831064523*/http://bostonmed.abcnews.go.com/discuss/episode/1

  2. 2.

    Ibid.

  3. 3.

    Brigham and Women’s Hospital Facebook page, posted circa August 2010, https://www.facebook.com/pages/Brigham-and-womens-hospital/191008060937266

  4. 4.

    Seattle Children’s Hospital, “Seattle Mama Doc” home page. Accessed 12/10/15. Available at http://seattlemamadoc.seattlechildrens.org/

  5. 5.

    For the video, see Methodist Healthcare, OR Live website, originally aired April 21, 2009, accessed May 17, 2012, http://www.orlive.com/methodisthealth/videos/awake-craniotomy1

References

  • Allen, R. 1985. Speaking of soap operas. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Medical Association. 2011. American Medical Association Code of Medical Ethics. Opinion 9.124 – Professionalism in the use of social media. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion9124.page?

  • Andrejevic, M. 2004. Reality TV: The work of being watched. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belluck, P. 2009. Webcast your brain surgery? Hospitals see marketing tool. New York Times online. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/health/25hospital.html?scp=2&sq=awake%20craniotomy&st=cse.

  • Boyd, D., and K. Crawford. 2012. Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication, & Society 15 (5): 662–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, S. 2008. Overtreated: Why too much medicine is making us sicker and poorer. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield, M., et al. 2014. Ambiguity tolerance of students matriculating to U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine 89 (11): 1526–1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, P., and M. Ivancin. 2006. The “reality” of health: Reality television and the public health. Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A., et al., eds. 2010. Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health and illness in the U.S. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crary, J. 1992. Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, M. 1995. Redeeming the wasteland: Television documentary and cold war politics. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L., and P. Galison. 1992. The image of objectivity. Representations 40: 81–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diem, S.J., J.D. Lantos, and J.A. Tulsky. 1996. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television: Miracles and misinformation. New England Journal of Medicine 334: 1578–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doctor on Demand. 2015. Doctor on demand home page. Available at: http://www.doctorondemand.com/the-doctors/.

  • Dumit, J. 2003. Picturing personhood: Brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heussner, K.M. 2008. Who’s keeping you in line online? ABC News website. Available at: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=6020149#.T6wwML_sxAs.

  • Howell, J. 1995. Technology in the hospital: Transforming patient care in the early twentieth century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. 2008. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, B. 1992. The perils of ‘x-ray vision’: How radiographic images have historically influenced perception. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 35 (3): 382–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, L.W. 1988. Highbrow/lowbrow: The emergence of cultural hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E. 1995. Flexible bodies: The role of immunity in American culture from polio to AIDS. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall. [1964] 1994. Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A. 1996. Total television. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, J. 2004. Genre and television: From cop shows to cartoons in American culture. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S.T., H.J. Hether, and Rideout, V. 2008. How healthy is prime time? An analysis of health content in popular prime time television programs. A Kaiser family foundation report. Available at: http://kff.org/other/report/how-healthy-is-prime-time-an-analysis-of-health-content-in-popular-prime-time-television-programs/.

  • Ostherr, K. 2013. Medical visions: Producing the patient through film, television, and imaging technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persch, J.A. 2009. ‘House’ effect: TV Doc has real impact on care. NBC News Website. Available at http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32745079/ns/health-health_care/t/house-effect-tv-doc-has-real-impact-care/.

  • Pribble, J.A., K.M. Goldstein, E.F. Fowler, M.J. Greenberg, S.K. Noel, and J.D. Howell. 2006. Medical news for the public to use? What’s on local TV news. American Journal of Managed Care 12: 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, J.W. 1965. Television in medical teaching and research (A survey and annotated bibliography). Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, C. 2008. The political economic origins of reali-TV. In Reality TV: Remaking television culture, 2nd ed., ed. S. Murray and L. Ouellette, 123–140. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, S.J. 1978. Medicine and the reign of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Technological medicine: The changing world of doctors and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. 2002. Media and health. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Serlin, D. 2010. Performing live surgery on television and the internet since 1945. In Imagining illness: Public health and visual culture, ed. D. Serlin, 223–244. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society for Participatory Medicine. 2015. e-patients.net blog home page. Available at http://e-patients.net.

  • Spigel, L. 2008. TV by design: Modern art and the rise of network television. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Startup Health. 2015. Annual report 2015: The year digital health hit its stride. Available at: http://www.startuphealth.com/content/insights-2015.

  • Topol, E. 2012. The creative destruction of medicine: How the digital revolution will create better healthcare. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, C. 2009. Reinventing cinema: Movies in the age of media convergence. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turow, J. 1989. Playing doctor: Television, storytelling, and medical power. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicclair, M.R. 2008. Medical paternalism in House, MD. Medical Humanities 34: 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zickuhr, K., and A. Smith 2012. Digital differences. Pew internet and American life project report. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Digital-differences/Overview.aspx.

Media

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten Ostherr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ostherr, K. (2019). Medicalized Screens from the Cold War to the Social Web. In: Görgen, A., Nunez, G.A., Fangerau, H. (eds) Handbook of Popular Culture and Biomedicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90677-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90677-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90676-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90677-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics