Faith-Based Versus Secular Support for Fragile Families: Parent Education in the Rural South



The first stop on our tour of the service provision landscape in post-welfare America is rural Mississippi. In many respects, Mississippi is an ideal state in which to begin our investigation. Mississippi has long been known for its inordinately high poverty rate and its large proportion of female-headed families. Mississippi, sometimes referred to as the buckle of the Bible Belt, is also one of the most religious states in the country. The dominant faith traditions in Mississippi are those of the conservative Protestant variety, including denominations often described as fundamentalist such as Baptists. Pentecostals such as Church of God in Christ are also well represented. United Methodists, the primary mainline Protestant denomination in the state, enjoy a significant share of the religious market as well, although Mississippi Methodists are generally more conservative than their methodists in other parts of the country.


  1. Anderson, Elaine A., Julie K. Kohler, and Bethany L. Letiecq. 2002. Low-income fathers and “responsible fatherhood” programs: A qualitative investigation of participants’ experiences. Family Relations 51: 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartkowski, John P. 2001. Remaking the godly marriage: Gender negotiation in evangelical families. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartkowski, John P., and Christopher G. Ellison. 1995. Divergent models of childrearing in popular manuals: Conservative Protestants versus the mainstream experts. Sociology of Religion 56: 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartkowski, John P., and Helen A. Regis. 2003. Charitable choices: Religion, race, and poverty in the post-welfare era. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Goldman, Robert, and Stephen Papson. 1998. Nike culture. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Holmes, Erin K., Adam M. Galovan, Keitaro Yoshida, and Alan J. Hawkins. 2010. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of resident fathering programs: Are family life educators interested in fathers? Family Relations 59: 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaminski, Jennifer Wyatt, Linda Anne Valle, Jill H. Filene, and Cynthia L. Boyle. 2008. A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 36: 567–589.Google Scholar
  8. Littlefield, Marci B. 2010. Social services, faith-based organizations, and the poor. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39: 1014–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McConachie, Helen, and Tim Diggle. 2007. Parent implemented early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13: 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Roy, Kevin M., and Dyson Omari. 2010. Making daddies into fathers: Community-based fatherhood programs and the construction of masculinities for low-income African American men. American Journal of Community Psychology 45: 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas, Rae, and Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck. 2007. Behavioral outcomes of parent-child interaction therapy and triple P–Positive Parenting Program: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 35: 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wilson, Kristina, Patricia Gonzalez, Tony Romero, Kimberly Henry, and Christine Cerbana. 2010. The effectiveness of parent education for incarcerated parents: An evaluation of parenting from prison. Journal of Correctional Education 61: 114–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social WorkCentral Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA

Personalised recommendations