Skip to main content

Contextualizing Slavery’s Wrongness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 794 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I contextualize slavery’s wrongness by considering whether certain forms of servitude that overlap slavery should count as slavery. I argue in favour of the League of Nations’ definition of slavery, which aimed to broaden the Enlightenment concept with a focus on power relations sometimes involved in overlapping cases of servitude. I resist endorsing the legal enforcement of slavery contracts when such agreements grant employers an absolute power of life or death over labourers. Given that overlapping cases of servitude do not count as slavery unless they satisfy this particular condition, it is misguided to include all overlapping cases we find morally objectionable, for this stipulation does not preclude a condemnation of unjust cases of servitude that do not count as slavery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allain, J. (2012). Slavery in International Law. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, K. (2000). Disposable People: New Slavery in the Global Economy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, K. (2005). Understanding Global Slavery. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastia, T., & McGrath, S. (2011). Temporality, Migration and Unfree Labour: Migrant Garment Workers. Manchester Papers in Political Economy (Vol. 6). Manchester: University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridis, T. (2002, January 2). Visas for Some Who Are Smuggled in “Slaves” Can Stay If They Would Face Extreme Hardship at Home. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, W. (2012). Toward a Thirteenth Amendment Exclusionary Rule as a Remedy for Racial Profiling. In A. Tsesis (Ed.), The Promises of Liberty: Thirteenth Amendment Abolitionism and Its Contemporary Vitality. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanana, D. R. (1960). Slavery in Ancient India: As Depicted in Pali and Sanskrit Texts. New Delhi: People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, E. (Ed.). (1994). Hobbes Leviathan (p. 131). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, F. (1855/1969). My Bondage and My Freedom. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher, S. (2012). The Shocking Birth of British Abolitionism. Slavery and Abolition, 33(4), 571–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, R. M. (2005). A Social History of the Deccan, 1300–1761: Eight Indian Lives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman, A. (2010). Undocumented Migrants and Resistance in the Liberal State. Politics and Society, 38(3), 408–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, B. J. (1987). Slavery and Freedom on the Middle Ground: Maryland During the Nineteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, E. D. (1969). The Treatment of Slaves in Different Countries: Problems in the Application of the Comparative Method. In L. Foner & E. D. Genovese (Eds.), Slavery in the New World: A Reader in Comparative History (pp. 202–210). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, A. (2012). To Indent Oneself: Ownership, Contracts, and Consent in Antebellum Illinois. In J. Allain (Ed.), The Legal Understanding of Slavery (Chapter 7). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. G. (2004, September 14). Unpaid Labor: Brazilian Slaves Help Make Products That End Up in the United States Through World Trade. San Jose Mercury News, pp. 1A and 15A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1976). Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon. Ebook Available at: https://www.marxists.org.

  • Jackson, B. S. (1988). Biblical Laws of Slavery: A Comparative Approach. In Archer (Ed.), Slavery and Other Forms of Unfree Labor (p. 90). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. (1861). Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. Boston, np. Ebook Available at: http://docsouth.unc.edu/fpn/jacobs/menu.html.

  • Kapstein, E. B. (2006). The New Global Slave Trade. Foreign Affairs, 85, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A. (1988). Debt Bondage in Latin America. In L. Archer (Ed.), Slavery and Other Forms of Unfree Labor. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1970). Slave Society in Cuba During the Nineteenth Century. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1689/1960). Two Treatises of Government. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, T. (1998). Early Enlightenment Conceptions of the Rights of Slaves. In T. Lott (Ed.), Subjugation and Bondage: Critical Essays on Slavery and Social Philosophy (99–129). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, N. (2002). Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1990). Slavery as Salvation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1832). Early Essays on Marriage and Divorce. In A. Rossi (Ed.), (1970) Essays on Sex Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1859/1978). On Liberty. E. Rappaport (Ed.), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1869). The Subjection of Women. In A. S. Rossi, J. S. Mill, & H. T. Mill (Eds.), Essays on Sex Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell Davidson, J. (2006). Will the Real Sex Slave Please Stand Up. Feminist Review, 83, 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell Davidson, J. (2015). Modern Slavery. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, O. (1991). Freedom in the Making of Western Culture. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, O. (2012). Trafficking, Gender, and Slavery: Past and Present. In J. Allain (Ed.), The Legal Understanding of Slavery (Chapter 17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, J. (2012). Defining Slavery in All Its Forms: Historical Inquiry as Contemporary Instruction. In J. Allain (Ed.), The Legal Understanding of Slavery (Chapter 14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. (2012). Under Color of Law: Siliadin v. France and the Dynamics of Enslavement in Historical Perspective. In J. Allain (Ed.), The Legal Understanding of Slavery (Chapter 8). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de. (1981). The Class Struggle in the Ancient World, From the Archaic Age to the Arab Conquest (pp. 133–200). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ste. Croix, G. E. M. de. (1988). Slavery and Other Forms of Unfree Labour. In L. Archer (Ed.), Slavery and Other Forms of Unfree Labour. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzgalis, W. (1998). The Same Tyrannical Principle: Locke’s Legacy on Slavery. In J. K. Ward & T. Lott (Eds.), Subjugation and Bondage: Critical Essays on Slavery and Social Philosophy. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1944). Capitalism and Slavery. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1998). Necessary Identities. In J. K. Ward & T. Lott (Eds.), Subjugation and Bondage: Critical Essays on Slavery and Social Philosophy. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson, C. G. (1924). Free Negro Owners of Slaves in the United States in 1830. New York: Negro Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, B. (2004, February 18–24). Enslaved in Palo Alto. San Francisco Weekly, pp. 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yun, L., & Laremont, R. R. (2001). Chinese Coolies and African Slaves in Cuba, 1847–74. Journal of Asian American Studies, 4(June), 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommy Lott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lott, T. (2018). Contextualizing Slavery’s Wrongness. In: Brace, L., O'Connell Davidson, J. (eds) Revisiting Slavery and Antislavery. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90623-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90623-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90622-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90623-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics