Advertisement

The Interplay Between Silence and Significance: An Analysis of Sustainability Reports

  • Ana Cristina Campos Marques
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

“Music is the silence between the notes”, Claude Debussy once wrote. It is through silence that we understand what is said. In this study, I have analyzed the meanings of what is not written (silences) in the sustainability reports of the benchmarking organizations on sustainability in Brazil. This analysis was conducted through reflexivity at different levels: the narrative, the antenarrative and the fractal level. It reveals that the silences in these sustainability reports are related to the underlying antenarrative regarding the business case for sustainability. At an even deeper level, this suggests that the antenarrative on the business case for sustainability is related to the fractal narrative regarding the fear of scarcity and the competition for survival. This study offers a call to organizations, researchers and practitioners, that may be trapped in past paradigms and assumptions. It shows that a more fruitful approach would be making time for reflection and introspection on topics like purpose, values and praxis.

Keywords

Sustainability report Narrative Brazil Corporate sustainability GRI 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the editors for the invitation and helpful feedback on earlier versions of this chapter. I am grateful to Arjo Klamer, Marja Flory, Ynze Alkema, Cristina Costa-Rijskamp and Brigitte Bernard-Rau for the valuable comments and discussions on this study. I also want to express my gratitude for the scholars who provided valuable feedback on the previous versions of this chapter at Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility Conference 2016 in Berlin, and Organizational Discourse Conference 2016 in Amsterdam.

References

  1. Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32, 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, C. A., Potter, B., Singh, P., & York, P. (2016). Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures). The British Accounting Review, 48, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. ANEEL. (2017). Matriz de energia elétrica. Accessed June 7, 2017, from http://www2.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/capacidadebrasil/OperacaoCapacidadeBrasil.cfm
  6. Auster, E. R., & Freeman, R. E. (2013). Values and poetic organizations: Beyond value fit toward values through conversation. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, M. L. (2016). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A critique and an indirect path forward. Business & Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660044.
  8. Bakhtin, M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Baue, B. (2014). Sustainability context group website goes life. Accessed May 30, 2017, from http://www.sustycontext.org/blog/
  10. Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  12. Coupland, C. (2005). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based reports: Currency in the banking sector? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17, 865–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dantas, J. A., Medeiros, O. P., & Paulo, E. (2011). Relação entre concentração e rentabilidade no setor bancário brasileiro. Revista Contabilidade e Finanças, 22(55), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured species in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  15. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  16. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Commitment to corporate social responsibility measured through global reporting initiative reporting: Factors affecting the behaviour of companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 81, 244–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman, R. E. (2008). Ending the so-called ‘Friedman-Freeman’ debate. In Agle, B. R. et al. Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2013a). G4 Sustainability reporting guidelines – part 1: Reporting principles and standard disclosures.Google Scholar
  21. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2013b). G4 Sustainability reporting guidelines – part 2: Implementation Manual.Google Scholar
  22. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2013c). Sustainability topics for sectors: What do stakeholders want to know?Google Scholar
  23. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2015). Sustainability and reporting trends in 2025: Preparing for the future.Google Scholar
  24. GRI Database. (2017). Sustainability disclosure database. Accessed April 12, 2017, from http://database.globalreporting.org
  25. Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., George, G., & Nichols, C. V. (2014). From the editors: Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1227–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keynes, J. M. (1953). The general theory of employment, interest and money. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  27. Klamer, A. (2016). Doing the right thing: A value based economy. London: Ubiquity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Klamer, A. (2016a). The value-based approach to cultural economics. Journal of Cultural Economics, 40, 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mandelbrot, B. (1977). The fractal geometry of nature. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  30. Marques, A. C. C. (2016). Interview with Edward Freeman – A new narrative for business: Beyond the business case for sustainability. Accessed May 25, 2017, from www.luminaperspectives.com/interview_edfreeman
  31. McCloskey, D. N. (1983). The rhetoric of economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 21(2), 481–517.Google Scholar
  32. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA). (2017). Biodiversidade Brasileira. Accessed June 28, 2017, from http://www.mma.gov.br/biodiversidade/biodiversidade-brasileira
  33. O’Neill, R. (2016). Closing the sustainability-investor gap. London: SustainAbility Ltd..Google Scholar
  34. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perey, R. (2014). Organizing sustainability and the problem of scale: Local, global, or fractal? Organization & Environment, 27(3), 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulrarni, M., Solansky, S. T., & Travis, D. V. (2007). Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sandberg, M., & Holmlund, M. (2015). Impression management tactics in sustainability reporting. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 677–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Millar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Methuen & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. The B Team. (2017). Born B in Brazil. Accessed July 07, 2017, from http://bteam.org/original-content/born-b-in-brazil/
  41. The World Bank. (2017). Brazil. Accessed July 4, 2017, from http://data.worldbank.org/country/brazil?view=chart
  42. Waddock, S. (2007). Leadership integrity in a fractured knowledge world. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(4), 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Waddock, S., & McIntosh, M. (2009). Beyond corporate responsibility: Implications for management development. Business and Society Review, 114(3), 295–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watts, J. (2017). Operation car wash: Is this the biggest corruption scandal in history? The Guardian. Accessed July 4, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/01/brazil-operation-car-wash-is-this-the-biggest-corruption-scandal-in-history

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Cristina Campos Marques
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.Lumina PerspectivesCuritibaBrazil
  3. 3.Lumina PerspectivesAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations