Skip to main content

Leachables and Extractables: From Regulatory Expectations to Laboratory Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges in Protein Product Development

Part of the book series: AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series ((AAPS,volume 38))

Abstract

During manufacturing, storage and administration, a pharmaceutical drug product (DP) formulation and its constituents are in contact with a multitude of polymeric materials. Every such contact leads to leaching of chemicals from the material into the formulation. Health authorities demand from the pharmaceutical manufacturer to control leaching within an extractables/leachables (E/L) assessment as a measure to prevent the patient from undue risk. Such an E/L assessment is structured into different parts. Initially, the manufacturing, storage and administration process is mapped; i.e. all contact materials are listed together with relevant process parameters that might influence leaching. A risk evaluation scores the materials according to their risk. High-risk materials are subjected to laboratory E/L testing. Test conditions, i.e. incubation of materials, should reflect the conditions encountered in the process—too exaggerated incubation conditions leading to excessive extractables profiles that do not correlate with leachables profiles encountered during real contact should be avoided. Analysis of the incubation solutions within screening studies should cover comprehensively the physical–chemical properties of E/L compounds; typical analytical methods are headspace-GC–MS, GC–MS and LC–UV–MS. Quantitative evaluation of analytical data should be performed against analytical evaluation thresholds derived from toxicological safety thresholds. Compounds encountered above the threshold need follow-up activities, e.g. structural identification and toxicological assessment. Special considerations have to be applied and are discussed within this chapter with regard to E/L assessment of drug substance manufacturing materials, the interaction of leachables with process constituents, glass delamination, leaching of silicon oil and leaching from secondary packaging materials, adhesives and printing. In summary, a proper E/L assessment should enable the pharmaceutical manufacturer to choose manufacturing, storage and administration materials that do not pose an undue risk for patients with regard to leaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zweifel H. (ed) Plastics additives handbook. Munich: Hanser Publisher. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 21 CFR Sec. 211.65, Equipment construction. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 21 CFR Sec. 211.94, Drug product containers and closures. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Guidance for industry—container closure systems for packaging human drugs and biologics. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human and Use (CHMP) and Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP). Guideline on plastic immediate packaging materials. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. United States Pharmacopeia. <1663> Assessment of extractables associated with pharmaceutical packaging/delivery systems.

    Google Scholar 

  7. United States Pharmacopeia. <1664> Assessment of drug product leachables associated with pharmaceutical packaging delivery systems.

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) M7. Assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Teasdale A, Jahn M, Bailey S, Feilden A, Taylor G, Corcoran ML, Malick R, Jenke D, Stults CLM, Nagao LM. Controlled extraction studies applied to polyvinyl chloride and polyethylene materials: conclusions from the ELSIE controlled extraction pilot study. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014;16:664–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma B, Bader F, Templeman T, Lisi P, Ryan M, Heavner GA. Technical investigation into the cause of the increased incidence of antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia associated with Eprex®. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2004;5:86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Curry W, Conway L, Goodfield C, Miller K, Mueller RL, Polini E. Reducing the risk of contamination of sterile parenteral products via ready-to-use closure components. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:1572–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Product Quality Research Institute Leachables and Extractables Working Group. Safety thresholds and best practices for extractables and leachables in orally inhaled and nasal drug products. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Academy of Pediatrics. Benzyl alcohol: toxic agent in neonatal units. Pediatrics. 1983;72:356–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Q3D. Guideline for elemental impurities. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shukla AA, Hubbard B, Tressel T, Guhan S, Low D. Downstream processing of monoclonal antibodies—application of platform approaches. J Chromatogr B. 2007:28–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding W, Madsen G, Mahajan E, O’Connor S, Wong K. Standardized extractable testing protocol for single-use systems in biomanufacturing. Pharm Eng. 2014;34:1–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammond M, Nunn N, Rogers G, Lee H, Marghitoiu AL, Perez L, Samuel YN, Anderson C, Vandiver M, Kline S. Identification of a leachable compound detrimental to cell growth in single-use bioprocess containers. PDA J Pharm Sci Tech. 2013;67:123–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bee JS, Nelson SA, Freund E, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW. Precipitation of a monoclonal antibody by soluble tungsten. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98:3290–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang JY, Xiao NJ, Zhu M, Zhang J, Hoff E, Russell SJ, Katta V, Shire SJ. Leachables from saline-containing IV bags can alter therapeutic protein properties. Pharm Res. 2010;27:2402–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ennis RD, Pritchard R, Nakamura C, Coulon M, Yang T, Visor GC, Lee WA. Glass vials for small volume parenterals: influence of drug and manufacturing processes on glass delamination. Pharm Dev Technol. 2001;6:393–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Basu P, Krishnan S, Thirumangalathu R, Randolph TW, Carpenter JF. IgG1 aggregation and particle formation induced by silicone-water interfaces on siliconized borosilicate glass beads: a model for siliconized primary containers. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102:852–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the countless contributions of Andreas Zerr, Lonza AG, to increasing the knowledge on extractables and leachables.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Jahn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jahn, M. (2018). Leachables and Extractables: From Regulatory Expectations to Laboratory Assessment. In: Warne, N., Mahler, HC. (eds) Challenges in Protein Product Development. AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90603-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics