Advertisement

Not So Straight Shooters: Queering the Cyborg Body in Masculinized Gaming

  • Nicholas Taylor
  • Shira Chess
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Games in Context book series (PAGCON)

Abstract

Piqued by instances of homoerotic aggression in both online and physical contexts of play, this chapter explores the potentially queering aspects of gaming between straight white men. In contradiction to hegemonic masculine ideal of an impermeable and agential male body, players’ bodies are played upon by pulses of affect originating from the game and/or from the bodily/machinic exertions of other players’ button mashing.

Read thusly, instances of sexualized aggression allow straight male gamers to assert their heteronormativity, while also enjoying the erotic intimacy of male-on-male gaming and the queering pleasures of digital play. By illuminating the fraught paradox between homoeroticism and homophobia that characterizes these play spaces, this chapter contributes to growing body of research that illustrates the fraught associations between heteronormativity, masculinity, and gaming.

Keywords

Masculinity Digital games Homoeroticism Queer studies Cyberfeminism 

Bibliography

  1. Alloway, Nola, and Pam Gilbert. 1998. Video Game Culture: Playing with Masculinity, Violence and Pleasure. In Wired-up: Young People and the Electronic Media, ed. Sue Howard, 95–114. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ash, James. 2013. Technologies of Captivation: Videogames and the Attunement of Affect. Body & Society 19 (1): 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belkin, Aaron. 2012. Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Facade of American Empire, 1898–2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chess, S. 2016. The Queer Case of Video Games: Orgasms, Heteronormativity, and Video Game Narrative. Critical Studies in Media Communication 33 (1): 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chess, Shira, and Adrienne Shaw. 2015. A Conspiracy of Fishes, or, How We Learned to Stop Worrying About #GamerGate and Embrace Hegemonic Masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59 (1): 208–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connell, Raewyn W. 2005. Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Consalvo, Mia. 2003. Hot Dates and Fairy-Tale Romances: Studying Sexuality in Games. In The Video Game Theory Reader, ed. Mark J.P. Wolf and Bernard Perron, 171–194. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2012. Confronting Toxic Gamer Culture: A Challenge for Feminist Game Studies Scholars. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology 1. https://doi.org/10.7264/N33X84KH.
  10. Cross, Katherine A. 2014. Ethics for Cyborgs: On Real Harassment in an “Unreal” Place. Loading... 8 (13): 4–12.Google Scholar
  11. Fron, Janine, Tracy Fullerton, Jacquelyn Morie, and Celia Pearce. 2007. The Hegemony of Play. Paper read at Situated Play: Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Association Conference, Tokyo, Japan, September 24–28.Google Scholar
  12. Giddings, Seth, and Helen Kennedy. 2008. Little Jesuses and Fuckoff Robots: On Aesthetics, Cybernetics, and Not Being Very Good at Lego Star Wars. In The Pleasures of Computer Gaming: Essays on Cultural History, Theory and Aesthetics, ed. Melanie Swalwell and Jason Wilson, 13–32. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, Kishonna L. 2012. Intersecting Oppressions and Online Communities. Information, Communication & Society 15: 411–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.642401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hacker, Sally. 1989. Pleasure, Power and Technology. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  15. Haraway, Donna. 1990. Simians, Cyborgs, and Humans. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Harper, Todd. 2014. The Culture of Digital Fighting Games: Performance and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hayles, Katherine. 2010. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Huizinga, Johan. 1970 [1938]. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  19. Humphreys, Laud. 1970. Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  20. Kennedy, Helen. 2002. Lara Croft: Feminist Icon or Cyberbimbo? On the Limits of Textual Analysis. Games Studies 2 (2). http://gamestudies.org/0202/kennedy/.
  21. Kirkland, Ewan. 2009. Masculinity in Video games: The Gendered Gameplay of Silent Hill. Camera Obscura 24 (271): 161–183.Google Scholar
  22. Kocurek, Carly. 2015. Coin-operated Americans: Rebooting Boyhood at the Video Game Arcade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leonard, David J. 2005. To the White Extreme: Conquering Athletic Space, White Manhood, and Racing Virtual Reality. In Digital Gameplay: Essays on the Nexus of Game and Gamer, ed. Nathan Garrelts, 110–129. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  24. Mechling, Jay. 2008. Paddling and the Repression of the Feminine in Male Hazing. Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies 2 (1): 60–75.Google Scholar
  25. Messner, Michael A. 2001. Friendship, Intimacy and Sexuality. In The Masculinities Reader, ed. Stephen M. Whitehead and Frank J. Barrett, 253–265. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2002. Taking the Field: Women, Men, and Sports. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  27. Nettleton, Pamela H. 2016. No Girls Allowed: Television Boys’ Clubs as Resistance to Feminism. Television & New Media: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416630300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paasonen, Susanna. 2011. Revisiting Cyberfeminism. Communications: The European Journal for Communication Research 36: 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2011.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Packer, Jeremy, and Stephen B. Crofts Wiley. 2012. Introduction: The Materiality of Communication. In Communication Matters: Materialist Approaches to Media, Mobility, and Networks, ed. Jeremy Packer and Stephen B. Crofts Wiley, 3–16. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Pronger, Brian. 1999. The Arena of Masculinity: Sports, Homosexuality, and the Meaning of Sex. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  31. Rich, Adrienne. 1980. Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs 5 (4): 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruberg, Bonnie. 2015. No Fun: The Queer Potential of Video Games that Annoy, Anger, Disappoint, Sadden, and Hurt. QED: A Journal of GLBTQ Worldmaking 2 (2): 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabo, Don, Terry Kupers, and Willie London. 2001. Prison Masculinities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Salter, Anastasia, and Bridgett Blodgett. 2012. Hypermasculinity and Dickwolves: The Contentious Role of Women in the New Gaming Public. Journal of Electronic Media 56 (3): 401–416.Google Scholar
  35. Sedgwick, Eve. 1995. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Shinkle, Eugenie. 2005. Corporealis Ergo Sum: Affective Response in Digital Games. In Digital Gameplay: Essays on the Nexus of Game and Gamer, ed. Nathan Garrelts, 21–35. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, David Harris, and Deborah Fels. 2012. The Disintegrated Erotics of Second Life. The International Journal of the Image 2 (3): 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stadler, John P. 2015. Designing Compulsion. -empyre-: soft_skinned_space, October. http://empyre.library.cornell.edu/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=992&highlight=john+stadler+designing+compulsion.
  39. Taylor, T.L. 2012. Raising the Stakes: E-sports and the Professionalization of Computer Gaming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, Nicholas, Jennifer Jenson, and Suzanne de Castell. 2009. Cheerleaders, Booth Babes, Halo Hoes: Pro-gaming, Gender, and Jobs for the Boys. Digital Creativity 20 (9): 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Voorhees, Gerald. 2012. Criticism and Control: Gameplay in the Space of Possibility. In CtrlAltPlay: Essays on Control in Video Gaming, ed. Matthew Wysocki, 9–20. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2014. Identification or Desire? Taking the Playeravatar Relationship to the Next Level. First Person Scholar. http://www.firstpersonscholar.com/identificationordesire/.
  43. Wajcman, Judy. 2010. Feminist Theories of Technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ben057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ward, Jane. 2015. Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Witkowski, Emma. 2013. Eventful Masculinities: Negotiations of Hegemonic Sporting Masculinities at LANs. In Sports Videogames, ed. Mia Consalvo, Konstantin Mitgutsch, and Abe Stein, 217–235. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Zeeland, Steven. 1996. The Masculine Marine: Homoeroticism in the U.S. Marine Corps. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Taylor
    • 1
  • Shira Chess
    • 2
  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.University of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations