Advertisement

Performing Neoliberal Masculinity: Reconfiguring Hegemonic Masculinity in Professional Gaming

  • Gerald Voorhees
  • Alexandra Orlando
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Games in Context book series (PAGCON)

Abstract

This chapter examines reconfigurations of masculinity in the culture of competitive, professional(ized) first-person shooter games. Our arguments center on a close study of the Cloud9 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive team’s performances both in gameplay and in the streams and other media with which they promote and market their brand. We build from the work on geek and jock masculinities by first enlarging the tropology of figures of masculinity being enacted by professional players. While the Cloud9 CS:GO team’s gameplay evidences the imbrication of technological mastery and sportive, militarized masculinity, among the team members we also find an outsider, an everyman, a team mother, a boyish joker, and a dandy. And rather than see these various figures of masculinity in opposition, we attempt to show that e-sports inculcates a neoliberal form of masculinity that borrows facets of hegemonic, subordinate, and even counterhegemonic formations of masculinity for the purpose of competitive effectivity and marketability.

Keywords

Masculinity Digital games e-Sports Neoliberalism Homoeroticism 

Bibliography

  1. Baerg, Andrew. 2012. Risky Business: Neoliberal Rationality and the Computer RPG. In Dungeons, Dragons, and Digital Denizens: The Digital Role-Playing Game, ed. Gerald Voorhees, Josh Call, and Katie Whitlock, 153–173. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, Tony. 2003. Culture and Governmentality. In Foucault, Cultural Studies and Governmentality, ed. Jack Bratich, Jeremy Packer, and Cameron McCarthy, 47–65. Albany, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  3. Biesecker, Barbara. 1995. Michel Foucault and the Question of Rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric 2: 351–364.Google Scholar
  4. Brookey, Robert Alan, and Thomas Patrick Oates, eds. 2014. Playing to Win: Sports, Video Games, and the Culture of Play. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bryce, Jo, and Jason Rutter. 2003. Gender Dynamics and the Social and Spatial Organization of Computer Gaming. Leisure Studies 22 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke, Kenneth. 1969. Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burrill, Derek A. 2008. Die Tryin’: Videogames, Masculinity, Culture. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  9. Cassell, Justine, and Henry Jenkins. 1998. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, Raewyn. 1992. A Very Straight Gay: Masculinity, Homosexual Experience, and the Dynamics of Gender. American Sociological Review 57 (6): 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R., and James W. Messerschmidt. 2005. Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept. Gender & Society 19 (6): 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Consalvo, Mia, Konstantin Mitgutsch, and Abraham Stein, eds. 2013. Sports Videogames. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Dyer-Witheford, Nick, and Greig de Peuter. 2009. Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, Michel. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 87–104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1988. Technologies of the Self. In Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, ed. Martin Luther, Huck Guttman, and Patrick Hutton, 16–48. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hamann, Trent H. 2009. Neoliberalism, Governmentality, and Ethics. Foucault Studies 6: 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harper, Todd. 2014. The Culture of Digital Fighting Games: Performance and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, Alison, and Stephanie Fisher. 2013. Making a Name in Games. Information, Communication & Society 16 (3): 362–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hong, Renyi. 2013. Game Modding, Prosumerism and Neoliberal Labor Practices. International Journal of Communication 7: 984–1002.Google Scholar
  21. Hutchins, Brett. 2008. Signs of Meta-change in Second Modernity: The Growth of e-Sport and the World Cyber Games. New Media & Society 10 (6): 851–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jin, Dal Yong. 2010. Korea’s Online Gaming Empire. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, Robin S. 2011. Masculinities in Play: Examining Hegemonic and Technomasculinity in Resident Evil 5 and Dead Space. American Men’s Studies Annual Review 2: 122–142.Google Scholar
  24. Jonasson, Kelly, and Jesper Thiborg. 2010. Electronic Sport and Its Impact on Future Sports. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics 13 (2): 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kafai, Yasmin B. 2008. Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  26. Kline, Steven, Nick Dyer-Witheford, and Greg de Peuter. 2003. Digital Play: The Interaction of Technology, Culture and Marketing. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kocurek, Carley. 2015. Coin Operated Americans: Rebooting Boyhood at the Video Arcade. St Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lemke, Thomas. 2001. ’The Birth of Bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the College de France on Neo-liberal Governmentality. Economy and Society 30 (2): 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, Monica, and Alice Summers. 2007. Gender Differences in Video Game Characters’ Roles, Appearances, and Attire as Portrayed in Video Game Magazines. Sex Roles 57 (9–10): 733–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, Toby. 2002. Sportsex. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Millington, Brad. 2009. Wii Has Never Been Modern: ‘Active’ Video Games and the ‘Conduct of Conduct’. New Media & Society 11 (4): 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakamura, Lisa. 2012. Queer Female of Color: The Highest Difficulty Setting There Is? Gaming Rhetoric as Gender Capital. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology 1. https://doi.org/10.7264/N37P8W9V.
  33. Nguyen, Kim. 2016. Rhetoric in Neoliberalism. In Rhetoric and Neoliberalism, ed. Kim Nguyen, 1–14. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Parker, Felan, Jeniffer Whitson, and Bart Simon. 2017. Mega Booth: The Cultural Intermediation of Indie Games. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817711403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ratan, Rabindra, Nick Taylor, Jameson Hogan, Tracy Kennedy, and Dimitri Williams. 2015. Stand by Your Man: An Examination of Gender Disparity in League of Legends. Games and Culture 10 (5): 438–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Read, Jason. 2009. A Genealogy of Homo-Economicus: Neoliberalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Foucault Studies 6: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rehak, Bob. 2003. Playing at Being: Psychoanalysis and the Avatar. In The Video Game Theory Reader, ed. M.J.P. Wolf and B. Perron, 103–127. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenthal, Carolyn. 1985. Kinkeeping in the Familial Division of Labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family 47 (4): 965–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seigel, Jerrod. 2005. The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe Since the Seventeenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaw, Adrienne. 2014. Gaming at the Edge: Sexuality and Gender at the Margins of Gamer Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Shugart, Helene. 2008. Managing Masculinities: The Metrosexual Moment. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 5 (3): 280–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Silverman, Mark, and Bart Simon. 2009. Discipline and Dragon Kill Points in the Online Power Game. Games and Culture 4 (4): 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Szablewicz, Marcella. 2011. From Addicts to Athletes: Participation in the Discursive Construction of Digital Games in Urban China. In Selected Papers of Internet Research, ed. Association of Internet Researchers. http://spir.aoir.org/papers/szablewicz.pdf.
  44. Taylor, Nicholas. 2011. Play Globally, Act Locally: The Standardization of Pro Halo 3 Gaming. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3 (1): 228–242.Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, Nicholas, Jen Jenson, and Suzanne De Castell. 2009. Cheerleaders/Booth Babes/ Halo Hoes: Pro-gaming, Gender and Jobs for the Boys. Digital Creativity NDCR 20 (4): 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, Nicholas, Kelly Bergstrom, Jen Jenson, and Suzanne de Castell. 2015. Alienated Playbour: Relations of Production in EVE Online. Games and Culture 10 (4): 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, T.L. 2012. Raising the Stakes: E-Sports and the Professionalization of Computer Gaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  48. Trujillo, Nick. 1991. Hegemonic Masculinity on the Mound: Media Representations of Nolan Ryan and American Sports Culture. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 8 (3): 290–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Voorhees, Gerald. 2012. Neoliberal Masculinity: The Government of Play and Masculinity in eSports. In Playing to Win: Sports, Video Games, and the Culture of Play, ed. Robert Brookey and Thomas Oates, 63–91. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wajcman, Judy. 1991. Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  51. Whitson, Jennifer. 2013. Gaming the Quantified Self. Surveillance and Society 11 (1/2): 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Witkowski, Emma. 2012. On the Digital Playing Field How We “Do Sport” With Networked Computer Games. Games and Culture 7 (5): 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang, Lin. 2013. Productive vs. Pathological. The Contested Space of Video Games in Post-Reform China (1980s–2012). International Journal of Communication 7: 2391–2411.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Voorhees
    • 1
  • Alexandra Orlando
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations