Abstract
A public person is not owner as private individuals are. Their assets are public and no other criterion than the public figure of the owner is required, as well as their right to property, which is public—not private as that of Article 544 of the civil code—the exercise of which is immediately assigned to the satisfaction of the legitimate interests of their role. Therefore, specific patrimonial features which, certainly, have such a level of generality that their scope seems limited or their independence uncertain, are no less essential. It is through the prism of this public property right that tumor banks and biobanks will be approached.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Mr. Maxime Boul’s speech.
- 2.
See Ms. Marie-Xavière Catto’s speech.
- 3.
See Ms. Florence Bellivier and Christine Noiville’s speech.
- 4.
1st Civ., 21st December 1987, BRGM c/ Lloys Continental, RFDA, 1998, p. 771, B. Pacteau’s note, Charbonnier’s conclusion; CJEG, 1988, p. 107, L. Richer’s note; JCP G, 1989, II, no. 21183, B. Nicod’s note, RTD Civ., 1989, p. 145, R. Perrot’s note; GDDAD, Paris, Dalloz, 2013, p. 663, Ph. Yolka’s note.
- 5.
Council of State, 18th November 2005, Société fermière de Campoloro et autre, Req. No. 271898.
- 6.
Council of state, 17th March 1893, Chemins de fer de l’est, D. 1894, p. 119, Romieu’s conclusion; Council of State, 6th March 1914, Synd. de la boucherie de la ville de châteauroux : Rec. Council of State, p. 308.—25th Nov. 1927, Sté des établissements Arbel : Rec. Council of State, p. 1114.
- 7.
Constitutional Council, decision no. 86-207 DC of 25th-26th June 1986, recital 58, Rec. Const. coun., p. 71.
- 8.
Notably, following Mr. Philippe Yolka’s PhD, aforementioned.
- 9.
From the decision of CS, sect., 3rd Nov. 1997, Cne Fougerolles, Req. No. 169473.
- 10.
CAA Paris, 17th Oct. 2013, no. 13PA00911, Ville de Paris, Fédération française de tennis : JCP A 2014, 110; AJDA 2014, p. 31, Mr. Sirinelli’s chronicle.
- 11.
Council of State, 14th Sept. 1994, Cne Escoutoux : Rec. CS 1994, p. 413.
- 12.
From practice, apprehended initially by tax law, business was explicitly established for the first time with the law of March 17th, 1909. It has been followed by others.
- 13.
Law no. 2006-11 of 5th January 2006.
- 14.
Law no 96-603 of 5th July 1996, whose Article 22 authorizes security according to business rules.
- 15.
Recognized with decision Cass. 1st civ., 7th Nov. 2000, Bull. civ., I, no. 273, p. 183; JCP G, II, 10452 note by F. Vialla; Defrenois, 2001, juris., p. 431, note by R. Libchaber.
- 16.
See the “Baby Loup” case and the judgment of 19th March 2013 by which the Court of Cassation states that “the principle of secularism established by article 1 of the Constitution is not applicable to employees of private employers who do not manage a public service”.
- 17.
C.C., 6th July 2009, no. 2009-584 DC, Loi portant réforme de l’hôpital et relative aux patients, à la santé et aux territoires, RFDA 2009. 1270 A. Roblot-Troizier’s review; see Articles L. 6112-1 et seq. of the Public Health Code defining the public health service and the empowerment of private institutions to operate it.
References
Bellivier, F., Morin, A.-L., & Noiville, C. (2009). Les biobanques s’invitent au banquet de la bioéthique : mode d’emploi. Revue politique et parlementaire, no. 1 to 50.
Bioy, X. (2010). Vers une politique publique des « biobanques ». RDSS, 885.
Chamard, C. (2004). La distinction des biens publics et des biens privés, contribution à la définition de la notion de biens publics. Dalloz, NBT.
Chatain-Autajon, L. (2006). La notion de fonds en droit privé. Litec.
Denizot, A. (2008). L’universalité de fait. Fondation Varennes.
Duroy, S. JCl. Propriétés publiques, fasc. 79-60 Occupations privatives du domaine privé.
Gaudemet, Y. (2014). Traité de droit administratif, t. 2, Droit administratif des biens (15e ed.). LGDJ.
Moysan, H. (2001). Le droit de propriété des personnes publiques. LGDJ.
Plessix, B. (2016). Droit administratif général. LexisNexis.
Rivero, J. (1947). Droit public et droit privé : conquête ou statu quo ? D., 1947, chron. XVIII.
Roux, C. (2015). Propriété publique et droit de l’Union européenne. LGDJ.
Schmaltz, B. (2016). Les personnes publiques propriétaires. Dalloz, NBT.
Sorbara, J.-G. (2016). Manuel de droit administratif des biens. PUF.
Truchet, D. (1982). Nouvelles récentes d’un illustre vieillard : Label de service public et statut de service public. AJDA, 427.
Yolka, P. (1996). La propriété publique. Éléments pour une théorie. LGDJ.
Yolka, P. (2013). Les grandes décisions du droit administratif des biens. Dalloz.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmaltz, B., Égéa, P. (2018). The Patrimonial Specificities of Public Persons. In: Bioy, X. (eds) Public Regulation of Tumor Banks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90563-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90563-1_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90562-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90563-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)