Skip to main content

Degrees of Acting Parliamentarily

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Parliamentary Thinking

Part of the book series: Rhetoric, Politics and Society ((RPS))

  • 329 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter deals with the distinct chances to extend parliamentary thinking of politics beyond parliaments in ordinary sense and discuss its limits. The point of comparing the parliamentary paradigm with other types of politics, such as intra-party struggles or multilateral diplomacy, lies in constructing a spectrum from the parliament to other assemblies. To analyse parliamentary degree of politics for example the prefixes as proto-, semi-, quasi- or pseudo-parliamentary assemblies are analysed. A special case lies in the relationships between academic and parliamentary debates based on the recognition of the dissensus, but having for example different relationships to written and oral debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Websites

Literature

  • Adiputri, Ratih D. 2015. Political Culture in the Indonesian Parliament. Analyzing Parliamentary Debates on Regional Parliaments 1999–2009. PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alapuro, Risto, and Henrik Stenius (eds.). 2010. Nordic Associations in an European Perspective. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankersmit, F.R. 2002. Political Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Sovereignty and Political Representation. Redescriptions 17: 10–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anweiler, Oskar. 1958. Die Rätebewegung in Rußland 1905–1921. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1963 (1990). On Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagehot, Walter. 1867 (2001). The English Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchstein, Hubertus. 2015. Elective and Aleatory Parliamentarism. In Parliamentarism and Democratic Theory, ed. Kari Palonen and José María Rosales, 255–278. Leverkusen: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, Armin. 2016. German Parliamentary Discourse Since 1848 from a Linguistic Point of View. In Parliament and Parliamentarism, ed. Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen, 176–191. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes Towards a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clinchamps, Nicolas. 2006. Parlement Européen et droit parlementaire. Essai sur la naissance du droit parlementaire de l’Union Européenne. Paris: L.G.D.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, Maurice. 1996. Les monarchies républicaines. Pouvoirs 78: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzensberger, Hans-Magnus. 1987. Ach Europa. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Europe, Europe. London: Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, Paul. 2012. How to Be an MP? London: Biteback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, Ernst. 1960. Das amerikanische Regierungssystem. Köln: Kiepenhauer & Witsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumuselu, Mihai, and Cornelia Ilie. 2010. Pseudo-Parliamentary Discourse in the Communist Dictatorship. Journal of Pragmatism 42: 924–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrigues, Jean (ed.). 2007. Histoire du parlement de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, J.A.W. 2009. When the French Tried to Be British. Party, Opposition and the Quest for Civil Disagreement 1814–1848. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapala, Taru. 2012. “That in the Opinion of this House”: The Parliamentary Culture of Debate in the Nineteenth-Century Cambridge and Oxford Union Societies. PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Political Rhetoric in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, 1830–1870. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayungs, Carsten. 1999. Die Geschäftsordnung des hannoverschen Landtages (1833–1866). Ein Beispiel englischen Parlamentsrechts auf deutschem Boden? Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. 1991. Rhetoric of Reaction. Perversity, Futility and Jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Belkamp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihalainen, Pasi, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen (eds.). 2016. Parliament and Parliamentarism. A Comparative History of a European Concept. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilie, Cornelia. 2010. Managing Dissent and Interpersonal Relations in the Romanian Parliamentary Discourse. In European Parliaments under Scrutiny, ed. Cornelia Ilie, 193–222. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ilie, Cornelia, and Cesar Ornatowski. 2016. Central and East European Parliamentary Rhetoric Since the Nineteenth Century: The Case of Romania and Poland. In Parliament and Parliamentarism, ed. Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen, 192–215. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jestaedt, Matthias, Oliver Lepsius, Christoph Möllers, and Christoph Schönberger. 2011. Das entgrenzte Gericht. Eine kritische Bilanz nach sechzig Jahren Bundesverfassungsgericht. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1798. Der Streit der Fakultäten. http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/buch/-3509/10 Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Kantorowicz, Hermann. 1929. Der Geist der englischen Politik und das Mythos der Einkreisung Deutschlands. Berlin: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibholz, Gerhard. 1951 (1967). Repräsentativer Parlamentarismus und parteienstaatliche Demokratie. In Parlamentarismus, ed. Kurt Kluxen, 349–360. Köln: Kiepenhauer & Witsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinen, Jo, and Andreas Bummer. 2017. Das demokratische Weltparlament. Eine kosmopolitische Vision. Bonn: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornatowski, Cesar. 2010. Parliamentary Discourse and Political Transition. In European Parliaments Under Scrutiny, ed. Cornelia Ilie, 223–264. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, Kari. 1994. Politics, Rhetoric and Conceptual History. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010a. “Objektivität” als faires Spiel. Wissenschaft als Politik bei Max Weber. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. The Parliamentarisation of Elections. Redescriptions 14: 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Politics and Conceptual Histories. Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Parliamentarism Challenged. In Challenges to Parliamentary Politics. Rhetoric, Representation and Reform, ed. Suvi Soininen and Tuula Vaarakallio, 17–35. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, Kari, Tuija Pulkkinen, and José María Rosales (eds.). 2008. The Ashgate Research Companion to the Politics of Democratisation in Europe. Concepts and Histories. Farnheim: Asghate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, Kari, and Claudia Wiesner. 2016. Second Chamber, ‘Congress of Ambassadors’ or Federal Presidency. Parliamentary and Nonparliamentary Aspects in the European Council’s Rules of Procedure. Parliaments, Estates & Representation 36: 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekonen, Onni. 2014. Debating the ABCs of Parliamentary Life: The Learning of Parliamentary Rules and Practices in the Late Nineteenth-century Finnish Diet and the Early Eduskunta. PhD thesis, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The Role of Professors in the Parliamentarisation of the Finnish Estate Diet: The Struggle between Two Conceptions of Parliament. Redescriptions 20: 116–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Eugène. 1887. De la procédure parlementaire. Étude sur le mécanisme intérieur du pouvoir législatif. Paris: Maison Quantin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redslob, Robert. 1918. Die parlamentarische Regierung in ihrer wahren und in ihrer unechten Form. Eine vergleichende Studie über die Verfassungen von England, Belgien, Ungarn, Schweden und Frankreich. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshchin, Evgeny. 2017. The Hague Conferences and ‘International Community’: A Politics of Conceptual Innovation. Review of International Studies 43: 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1943 (1977). L’être et le néant. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Kennedy and West Virginia, trans. Elizabeth Bowman. In Ronald Aronson and Adrian van den Howen eds, Sartre alive. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 1919 (1968). Politische Romantik. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1921 (1978). Die Diktatur. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1922 (1979). Politische Theologie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setälä, Maija. 2015. Can Deliberative Mini-Publics Improve the Quality of Democratic Decision-Making. In Parliamentarism and Democratic Theory, ed. Kari Palonen and José María Rosales, 165–186. Leverkusen: Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Quentin. 2008. Quentin Skinner Interviewed by Alan Macfarlane 10th January 2008. http://www.alanmacfarlane.com/ancestors/skinner.htm. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Spender, J.A. 1925. The Public Life, vols. 1–2. London: Casel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenius, Henrik. 2010. Nordic Associational Life in a European and in Inter-Nordic Perspective. In Nordic Associations in a European Perspective, ed. Risto Alapuro and Henrik Stenius, 29–86. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiilikainen, Teija, and Claudia Wiesner. 2016. Toward a Political Theory of EU Parliamentarism. In Parliament and Parliamentarism, ed. Pasi Ihalainen, Cornelia Ilie, and Kari Palonen, 292–310. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüffers, Bettina. 2016. Die 10. Volkskammer der DDR. Düsseldorf: Droste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valette, Philippe, and Benôit Saint-Marsy. 1839. Traité de la confection des lois, ou examen raisonnée des règlements suivis par les assemblées legislatives françaises, compares aux formes parlementaries de l’Angleterre, des États-Unis, de la Bélgique, de l’Espagne, de la Suisse, etc. Paris: Joubert. http://tinyurl.com/zrfkw3o. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Weber, Max. 1904 (1973). Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In GAW, ed. Johannes Winckelmann, 146–214. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1916 (1988). Deutschland unter europäischen Weltmächten. In MWS, I/15, ed. Wolfgang J. Mommsen, 61–78. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1919 (1994). Politik als Beruf. In MWS, 1/17, ed. Wolfgang Schluchter and Wolfgang J. Mommsen, 35–88. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, Claudia. 2015. The European Parliament: An Answer to the Challenges Facing Parliamentarism in Europe Today. In Challenges to Parliamentary Politics. Rhetoric, Representation and Reform, ed. Suvi Soininen and Tuula Vaarakallio, 37–58. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, Claudia, Taru Haapala, and Kari Palonen. 2017. Debates, Rhetoric and Political Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Harold. 1971. The Labour Government 1964–1970. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kari Palonen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palonen, K. (2019). Degrees of Acting Parliamentarily. In: Parliamentary Thinking. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90533-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics