Skip to main content

Parliamentary Time as a Medium of Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 322 Accesses

Part of the book series: Rhetoric, Politics and Society ((RPS))

Abstract

The chapter deals with parliamentary time that underlies all the other aspects as a temporal ‘subtext’ of parliamentary politics. The temporal aspect is built into the parliamentary procedures, debates, regimes and actors. It is not only a play in time but also a play with time. The parliamentary debate requires sufficient time but at the same time recognising that parliamentary time is always scarce, and a fair distribution of it between both items and members is necessary. Parliamentary politics shows therefore an extraordinary sensitivity for time. Parliamentary time is based on multiple rounds of debate as well as on a time order of parliamentary moves of different types. When used in parliamentary politics, temporal concepts, such as past, present and future, experience and expectation or kronos and kairos also receive a distinct parliamentary figuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

Websites

Literature

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1958 [1981]. Vita activa oder Vom tätigen Leben. München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1940 [1980]. Über den Begriff der Geschichte. In Illuminationen, Ausgewählte Schriften, 251–262. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1843. Essay on Political Tactics. In Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 2, 298–378. Edinburgh: Tait. http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/1921/113915. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Borchert, Jens. 2003. Die Professionalisierung der Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, John Marks. 1916. Oral English. Directions and Exercises for Planning and Delivering Common Kinds of Talks, Together with Guidance for Debating and Parliamentary Practice. Boston: Ginn. http://www.tinyurl.com/6nycqbj. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Campion, Gilbert. 1929. An Introduction to the Procedure of the House of Commons. London: Allen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1953a. Parliament and Democracy. In Parliament. A survey, ed. Gilbert Campion et al., 9–36. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1953b. Parliamentary Procedure: Old and New. Parliament. A survey, ed. Gilbert Campion et al., 141–167. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Gottfried. 1861. Die Verfassung und Geschäftsordnung des englischen Parlaments mit Hinweis auf die Geschäftsordnungen deutscher Kammern. Hamburg: Perthes-Besser & Mauke. http://tinyurl.com/o556sjt. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Craig, Robert. 1913. A History of Oratory in Parliament, 1213–1913. London: Heath, Cranton and Oaseley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, Emma. 2015. The House of Commons. An Anthropology of MPs at Work. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J.A.G., and Michael Ryle. 2003. In Parliament: Functions, Practices and Procedures, ed. Blackburn, Robert, and Andrew Kinnon, 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusy, Christoph. 2008. Demokratie in der Krise. Europa in der Zwischenkriegszeit. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapala, Taru. 2016. Political Rhetoric in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, 1830–1870. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, William Gerard. 1808/1927. Parliamentary Logic, ed. Courtney S. Kenny. Cambridge: Heffers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatschek, Julius. 1915. Englisches Staatsrecht: Die Verfassung. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. http://tinyurl.com/ptlzj3y. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Hatsell, John. 1818. Precedents of Proceedings in the House of Commons; With Observations, 4 vols. London: L. Hansard and Sons.   

    Google Scholar 

  • ———  vol. 2. [1781]. Relating to Members, Speaker etc. http://tinyurl.com/7p7br4h. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • ——— vol. 3. [1785]. Relating to Lords and Supply. http://tinyurl.com/ncazhkg. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Hobbes, Thomas [1640]. The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/TheElementsofLaw. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Ilbert, Courtenay. 1911. Parliament, Its History, Constitution and Practice. London: Williams and Norgate: http://tinyurl.com/nm5gvvk. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Jennings, W. Ivor 1939/1957. Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, Frederic George. 1889. Comparison of Ancient and Modern Political Oratory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, Reinhart. 1972. Über die Theoriebedürftigkeit der Geschichtswissenschaft. In Theorie der Geschichtswissenschaft und Praxis des Geschichtsunterrichts, ed. Werner Conze, 10–28. Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Vergangene Zukunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Zeitschichten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos, Kia. 1998. Now-time/Image-Space. Temporalization of Politics in Walter Benjamin’s Philosophy of History and Art. Jyväskylä: SoPhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, A. Lawrence 1908. The Government of England I-II. New York: Macmillan. http://tinyurl.com/nzkvx9f. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Malone, Edmund. 1808. Preface. In Parliamentary Logick, v–xlvi, ed. Edmund Malone and William Gerard Hamilton. London: Payne. http://tinyurl.com/msfjzy7. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • May, Thomas Erskine. 1844. A Treatise Upon the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament. London: Charles Knight: http://tinyurl.com/puv2sjd. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • ———. 1883. A Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament, 9th ed. London: Butterworths. http://tinyurl.com/oklmhdv. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Morrison, Herbert. 1954. Government and Parliament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, Peter. 1995. Politics of Time. Modernity and Avant-Garde. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palgrave, Reginald. 1878. The Chairman’s Handbook. Suggestions and Rules for the Conduct of the Chairmen in Public and Other Meetings, Drawn from the Procedure and Practice of the Parliament. London: Knight & Co. http://tinyurl.com/p2wloby. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Palonen, Kari. 2008. The Politics of Limited Times: The Rhetoric of Temporal Judgment in Parliamentary Democracies. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Politics and Conceptual Histories. Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. From Oratory to Debate. Parliamentarisation of Deliberative Rhetoric in Westminster. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Eugène. 1887. De la procédure parlementaire. Étude sur le mécanisme intérieur du pouvoir législatif. Paris: Maison Quantin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poudra, Jules, and Eugène Pierre. 1878. Traité de droit politique, électoral et parlementaire. Versailles: Cerf. http://tinyurl.com/nvkt9r9. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Redlich, Josef. 1905. Recht und Technik des Englischen Parlamentarismus. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, Peter. 2000. Parliament under Blair. London: Politico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Hartmut. 2005. Beschleunigung: Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussellier, Nicolas. 2000. Deux Formes de Représentation Politique: le citoyen et l’individu. In La démocratie en France. 1. Idéologies, ed. Marc Sadoun, 243–331. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scobell, Henry. 1656. Memorials of the Method and Manner of Proceedings in Parliament in Passing Bills. London: EEBO Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Thomas. 1583. De republica anglorum. London: Midleton. https://tinyurl.com/y8yonrx4. Accessed 12 March 2018.

  • Te Velde, Henk. 2012/2013. Parliamentary Obstruction and the ‘Crisis’ of European Parliamentary Politics Around 1900. Redescriptions 16, 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, Ryan A. 2015. Time and Politics. Parliament and the Culture of Modernity in Britain and the British World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, Paul. 1977. Vitesse et politique. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, Claudia, Taru Haapala, and Kari Palonen. 2017. Debates, Rhetoric and Political Action. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Tony. 2012. Doing Politics. London: Biteback.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kari Palonen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palonen, K. (2019). Parliamentary Time as a Medium of Politics. In: Parliamentary Thinking. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90533-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics