Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the Contribution and Challenges of Using Soft Systems Methodology to Facilitate Cultural Change: A Case Study in the Public Sector

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Organizing for the Digital World

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 28))

Abstract

Collaboration between professional agencies in the public sector is essential to provide seamless, high quality services to citizens. Inter-agency working is often hindered by a prevalent silo culture, reinforced by resource-focused funding mechanisms. Checkland’s Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) aims to facilitate organizational improvement or change through an organizational learning approach. In this study, SSM was used to help facilitate a move towards partnership working in the public sector. Interview data was collected from senior members of 16 professional agencies, four months after completing the SSM activity to reflect on the experience. The interviews were then repeated 12 months later in order to facilitate reflection on the use, role and impact of SSM beyond any immediate effect. From the interviews, we identified contributions of change that were attributed to the use of SSM and challenges of using SSM to facilitate cultural change. The challenges are explored in four themes: the process of stakeholder selection; the power of stakeholders; the ensuing power structure within the problem situation; the role of SSM and systemic change. These themes are discussed as contributing factors that practitioners of SSM need to be aware of to ensure the sanctity of SSM during periods of cultural change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beeson, I.A., Davis, C.: Emergence and accomplishment in organisational change. J. Organ. Change 13(2), 178–189 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Callo, V.N., Packham, R.G.: The use of soft systems methodology in emancipatory development. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 16(4), 311–319 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Checkland, P.: Soft Systems. Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Checkland, P., Holwell, S.: Information, Systems, and Information Systems. Wiley, Chichester (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Checkland, P., Scholes, J.: Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, Chichester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Connell, N.A.: Evaluating Soft OR: some reflections on an apparently ‘unsuccessful’ implementation using a soft systems methodology (SSM) based approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52(2), 150–160 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crabtree, F., Miller, W.L.: Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dowling, B., Powell, M., Glendinning, C.: Conceptualising successful partnerships. Health Soc. Care Community 12(4), 309–317 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flood, R.L.: Rethinking the fifth discipline: Learning within the unknowable. Routledge, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flood, R.L., Jackson, M.C.: Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Wiley, Chichester (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glaser, B., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson, M.: The nature of soft systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff, and Checkland. J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 9, 17–27 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs, B.: Using soft systems methodology for performance improvement and organisational change in the English National Health Service. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 12(4), 138–149 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalim, K., Carson, E., Cramp, D.: The role of soft systems methodology in healthcare policy provision and decision support. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Manag. Cybern. 6, 5025–5030 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kelliher, C., Parry, E.: Change in healthcare: the impact on NHS managers. J. Organ. Change Manag. 28(4), 591–602 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. King, N.: Template analysis. In: Symon, G., Cassell, C. (eds.) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organisational Research: A Practical Guide, pp. 118–134. Sage Publications, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Knight, L., Harland, C.: Managing supply networks: organisational roles in network management. Eur. Manag. J. 23(3), 281–292 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kotiadis, K.: Using soft systems methodology to determine the simulation study objectives. J. Simul. 1(3), 215–222 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuipers, B.S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., Van der Voet, J.: The management of change in public organizations: a literature review. Public Adm. 92(1), 1–20 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee, G., Kwak, Y.H.: An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 492–503 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackintosh, M.: Partnership: issues of policy and negotiation. Local Econ. 7(3), 210224 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malinova, L., Bednar, P.M., Welch, C.: Facilitating organizational change: a collaborative, open systems perspective. In: Benson, V., Filippaios, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, 9–10 June 2016, London, UK, pp. 159–166 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morgan, G.M.: Images of Organizations. Sage Publications, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ruijer, E.H.J.M., Huff, R.F.: Breaking through barriers: the impact of organizational culture on open government reform. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy 10(2), 335–350 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw, D., Edwards, J.S., Collier, P.M.: Quid Pro Quo: reflections on the value of problem structuring group workshops. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 939–949 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Signoretta, P., Craglia, M.: Joined-up government in practice: a case study of children’s needs in Sheffield. Local Gov. Stud. 28(1), 59–76 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Steane, P., Dufour, Y., Gates, D.: Assessing impediments to NPM change. J. Organ. Change Manag. 28(2), 263–270 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stowell, F. (ed.): Information Systems Provision: The Contribution of Soft Systems Methodology. McGraw-Hill, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tett, G.: The Silo Effect: The Peril of Expertise and the Promise of Breaking Down Barriers. Simon and Schuster, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Torlak, N.G., Müceldili, B.: Soft systems methodology in action: the example of a private hospital. Syst. Pract. Action Res 27(4), 325–361 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tuan, N.-T., Shaw, C.: Consideration of ethics in systemic thinking. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 29(1), 51–60 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wastell, D., Kawalek, P., Longmead-Jones, P., Ormerod, R.: Information systems and partnership in multi-agency networks: an action research project in crime reduction. Inf. Organ. 14(3), 189–210 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Weber, R.P.: Basic Content Analysis. Sage Publications, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  35. White, L.: Evaluating problem structuring methods: developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMs. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 842–855 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilson, B.: Systems Concepts, Methodologies and Applications. Wiley, Chichester (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson, B.: Soft Systems Methodology: Conceptual Model Building and Its Contribution. Wiley, Chichester (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DE, UK

    Sandi Kirkham

  2. Birmingham City University, Curzon Street, Birmingham, B4 7XG, UK

    Sharon A. Cox

Authors
  1. Sharon A. Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandi Kirkham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandi Kirkham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy

    Federico Cabitza

  2. Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy

    Carlo Batini

  3. Department of Management and Technology, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy

    Massimo Magni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cox, S.A., Kirkham, S. (2019). Understanding the Contribution and Challenges of Using Soft Systems Methodology to Facilitate Cultural Change: A Case Study in the Public Sector. In: Cabitza, F., Batini, C., Magni, M. (eds) Organizing for the Digital World. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90503-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation