Abstract
In knowledge intensive organizations—such as Information Technology (IT) companies or consultancy firms—knowledge sharing processes and collaboration represent key success factors for competing in a dynamic business environment. In small firms knowledge sharing and collaboration are facilitated by the physical proximity of the R&D or business development specialists. In large organizations, characterized by distributed settings, to speed up innovation and time-to-market, managers need to find ways to enable knowledge sharing and collaboration among individuals and teams located in different geographical areas. Managers have a choice of different strategies and IT tools to support employee collaboration. Through the institutional theory lens, the objective of this research is to better understand the challenges of selecting and using collaborative IT tools in a geographically distributed setting. To this end, we have collected data via a case study of a large IT organization that introduced a centralized mandated IT tool aimed at enabling collaboration among employees working in a distributed setting and belonging to different departments and functions. Our preliminary findings show that institutionalized practices, organizational silos as well as lack of time and incentives compromised the effective use of the mandated IT tool.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ang, S., Commings, L.: Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organ. Sci. 8, 235–256 (1997)
Carugati, A., Fernández, W., Mola, L., Rossignoli, C.: My choice, your problem? Mandating IT use in large organisational networks. Inf. Syst. J. (2018)
Currie, W.L.: Contextualising the IT artifact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory. Inf. Technol. People 22, 63–77 (2009)
DiMaggio, P., Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48(2), 147–160 (1983)
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14, 532–550 (1989)
Faik, I., Walsham, G.: Modernisation through ICTs: towards a network ontology of technological change. Inf. Syst. J. (2012)
Fernandez, W.D., Lehmann, H.: Case studies and grounded theory method in information systems research: issues and use. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 13, 4–15 (2011)
Glaser, B.G.: Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA (1978)
Glaser, B.G.: Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA (1998)
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Pub. Co., New York (1967)
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., Hinings, C.R.: Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Manag. J. 45(1), 58–80 (2002)
Mezias, S.J., Glynn, M.A.: The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolution. Strateg. Manag. J. 14, 77–101 (1993)
Mignerat, M., Rivard, S.: Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. J. Infor. Technol. 24(4), 369–391 (2009)
Mola, L., Carugati, A.: Escaping “localisms” in it sourcing: tracing changes in institutional logics in an Italian firm. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21, 388–403 (2012)
Orlikowski, W.J.: CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Q. 17, 309–340 (1993)
Powell, W.W., DiMaggio, P.J.: The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA (1991)
Scott, W.R.: Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests. SAGE Publications Inc., Thousands Oaks (2008)
Smith, S., Winchester, D., Bunker, D., Jamieson, R.: Circuits of power: a study of mandated compliance to an information systems security de jure standard in a government organization. MIS Q. 34(3), 463–486 (2010)
Tushman, M.L., Anderson, P.: Managing strategic innovation and change: a collection of readings. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)
Van de Ven, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Methods for studying innovation processes. In: Van de Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L., Poole, M.S. (eds.) Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies. Harper & Row, New York (1989)
Vitharana, P., Dharwadkar, R.: Information systems outsourcing: linking transaction cost and institutional theories. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 20 (2007)
Walsham, G.: The emergence of interpretivism in information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 6, 376–394 (1995)
Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., Irani, Z.: The diffusion and use of institutional theory: a cross-disciplinary longitudinal literature survey. J. Infor. Technol. 24(4), 354–368 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mola, L., Kaminska, R., Carugati, A. (2019). Changing Institutionalized Practices When Implementing a Mandated Technology. In: Cabitza, F., Batini, C., Magni, M. (eds) Organizing for the Digital World. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90503-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90503-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90502-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90503-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)