Advertisement

Enterprise Modelling: Establishing the Fundament for Capability Management

  • Janis StirnaEmail author
  • Kurt Sandkuhl
Chapter

Abstract

Enterprise Modelling (EM) is an activity where an integrated model describing different aspects of an enterprise is created. An enterprise model consists of a number of related “sub-models” or perspectives, each describing the enterprise from a particular view, for example, processes, business rules, goals, actors, and concepts/information/data. The purpose of using EM in the context of capability management is to capture and document the existing organizational design. The overall vision of capability management approaches, such as Capability-Driven Development (CDD), is to use (and update if necessary) the enterprise models that the organization already has for capability design. However, if an organization does not have existing models or their use is deemed impractical (e.g., they are severely out of date or the quality of models is below acceptable), new models need to be created. The chapter gives an introduction to the topic of Enterprise Modelling, including perspectives captured in enterprise models, a typical modelling process, and existing modelling methods.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vernadat, F.: Enterprise Modelling and Integration. Chapman & Hall, London (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modelling of Enterprises. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling – Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology – Theory and Methodology. Springer, Berlin (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fox, M.S., Gruninger, M.: Enterprise Modeling. AI Magazine 19(3) (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, P.: The entity-relationship model – toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1(1), 9–36 (1976).  https://doi.org/10.1145/320434.320440MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    OMG: OMG Unified Modeling Language TM (OMG UML), version 2.5 (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5
  8. 8.
    Persson, A., Stirna, J.: An explorative study into the influence of business goals on the practical use of Enterprise Modelling methods and tools. In: Tenth International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD2001), Royal Holloway, University of London, 5–7 Sept 2001Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bubenko, Jr., J.A., Persson, A., Stirna, J.: An intentional perspective on enterprise modeling. In: Salinesi, C., Nurcan, S., Souveyet, C., Ralyté, J. (eds.) An Intentional Perspective on Enterprise Modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Persson, A., Stirna, J.: Towards defining a competence profile for the enterprise modeling practitioner. In: The 3rd IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modelling (PoEM2010), Delft, The Netherlands, November 2010. LNBIP vol. 68. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheer, A.-W., Nüttgens, M.: ARIS architecture and reference models for business process management. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management—Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies. LNCS, vol. 1806. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Josey, A.: ArchiMate® 2.1–A Pocket Guide. Van Haren (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frank, U.: MEMO Organisation Modeling Language (1): Focus on Organisational Structure. ICB-Research Report No. 48. University Duisburg-Essen (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karagiannis, D., Grossmann, W., Höfferer, P.: Open Model Initiative—A Feasibility Study. University of Vienna, Vienna (2008). http://cms.dke.univie.ac.at/uploads/media/Open_Models_Feasibility_Study_SEPT_2008.pdf
  15. 15.
    F3-Consortium: F3 Reference Manual. ESPRIT III Project 6612, SISU, Sweden (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bubenko, Jr., J.A., Stirna, J., Brash, D.: EKD User Guide. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Loucopoulos, P., Kavakli, V., Prekas, N., Rolland, C., Grosz, G., Nurcan, S.: Using the EKD Approach: The Modelling Component. UMIST, Manchester (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bubenko, Jr., J.A., Persson, A., Stirna, J.: User Guide of the Knowledge Management Approach Using Enterprise Knowledge Patterns. IST Programme Project Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organisations, no. IST-2000-28401. KTH, Sweden (2001). http://www.dsv.su.se/~js/ekd_user_guide.html
  19. 19.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A.: Enterprise Modeling: Facilitating the Process and the People. Springer, Berlin (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Chair of Business Information Systems, Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations