Advertisement

Capability-Driven Business Process Outsourcing in Utility Industries

  • Ulrich CzubaykoEmail author
  • Hasan Koç
  • Jan-Christian Kuhr
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter presents the use of capability management in business process outsourcing (BPO) using a case from utility industries. Utility companies are facing a continuously changing business environment due to new regulations and bylaws from regulating authorities. Furthermore, new market roles and innovative technical solutions, like intelligent metering or grid utilization management, allow for process and product innovations. In this context, both the business processes in organizations and information systems supporting these processes need to be quickly adaptive to changing organizational needs. Business process outsourcing is an approach to tackle these challenges. The industrial case discussed in this chapter originates from SIV.AG, Germany, an independent software vendor and service provider for utility industries. One of the service areas of SIV.AG is business process outsourcing, that is, the performance of a complete business process for a business function by a service provider outside an organization. The chapter discusses the specific features of the case motivating the use of capability management, illustrative parts of the capability and context model, examples for adjustments at runtime, achieved benefits, and experiences.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goebel, C., Jacobsen, H., del Razo, V., et al.: Energy informatics. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 6(1), 25–31 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koç, H., Kuhr, J.-C., Sandkuhl, K., Timm, F.: Capability-driven development: a novel approach to design enterprise capabilities. In: El-Sheikh, E., Zimmermann, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Emerging Trends in the Evolution of Service-Oriented and Enterprise Architectures. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 111, pp. 91–112. Springer, Berlin (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Czubayko, U., Grabis, J., Koç, H., Kuhr, J-C., Sandkuhl, K.: Deliverable 2.2: CaaS Method Extensions for BPO: CaaS – Capability as a Service in digital enterprises. Collaborative Project Number 611351. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8zbXOx8DWQqYUl3QnBFQ1lBQTA (2015)
  4. 4.
    Moody, D.L.: The physics of notations: toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(6), 756–779 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO/IEC Systems and software engineering – Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models ISO/IEC FDIS 25010 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Valverde, F.: CDT Quality Requirements Survey (3rd Iteration). https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeRPkF3HApwM_MB2n7m0qTuCb2u-MOCDzq5ODqSn8HgH51j8A/viewform (2016). Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  7. 7.
    Valverde, F.: CNA Quality Requirements Survey (3rd Iteration). https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfvGhVeKvXRtgWzhlEhFdZ0-D2llDn03wLoqcfj4njNx74xrg/viewform (2016). Accessed 10 Jan 2017
  8. 8.
    Valverde, F.: CCP Quality Requirements Survey (3rd Iteration). https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe7YL1T0z6kgM0dDZt0YsqbEko1vWi8VY8Zhj3LcEbFH3tPYQ/viewform (2016). Accessed 10 Jan 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Czubayko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hasan Koç
    • 2
  • Jan-Christian Kuhr
    • 3
  1. 1.SIV Software-Architektur &Technologie GmbHRoggentinGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceThe University of RostockRostockGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringStralsund University of Applied SciencesStralsundGermany

Personalised recommendations