Skip to main content

Reusability Index: A Measure for Assessing Software Assets Reusability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Opportunities for Software Reuse (ICSR 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10826))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The reusability of assets is usually measured through reusability indices. However, these indices either do not synthesize their constituent metrics into an aggregate or they do not capture all facets of reusability, such as structural characteristics, external qualities, and their documentation. To alleviate these shortcomings, we introduce a reusability index (REI) as a synthesis of various software metrics that cover a number of related reusability aspects. Furthermore, we evaluate its ability to quantify reuse, by comparing it to existing indices through a case study on 15 reusable open-source assets (i.e., libraries and frameworks). The results of the study suggest that the proposed index presents the highest predictive and discriminative power, it is the most consistent in ranking reusable assets, and the most strongly correlated to their levels of reuse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to space limitations we present the 15 OSS projects that are used as a training set for the Backwards Linear Regression, together with the test set of the validation in Sect. 4.

  2. 2.

    The number of downloads is retrieved from https://mvnrepository.com. The value is obtained by the “used by” artifacts tag which is expected to be more accurate.

  3. 3.

    See https://martinfowler.com/bliki/InversionOfControl.html.

References

  1. 1061-1998: IEEE Standard for a Software Quality Metrics Methodology, IEEE Standards, IEEE Computer Society, 31 December 1998. Reaffirmed 9 December 2009

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ampatzoglou, A., Stamelos, I., Gkortzis, A., Deligiannis, I.: Methodology on extracting reusable software candidate components from open source games. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, pp. 93–100. ACM, Finland (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ampatzoglou, A., Gkortzis, A., Charalampidou, S., Avgeriou, P.: An embedded multiple-case study on OSS design quality assessment across domains. In: 7th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2013), pp. 255–258. ACM/IEEE Computer Society, Baltimore, October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arvanitou, E.M., Ampatzoglou, A., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Galster, M., Avgeriou, P.: A mapping study on design-time quality attributes and metrics. J. Syst. Softw. 127, 52–77 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bansiya, J., Davis, C.G.: A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(1), 4–17 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bibi, S., Ampatzoglou, A., Stamelos, I.: A Bayesian belief network for modeling open source software maintenance productivity. In: Crowston, K., Hammouda, I., Lundell, B., Robles, G., Gamalielsson, J., Lindman, J. (eds.) OSS 2016. IAICT, vol. 472, pp. 32–44. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39225-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(6), 476–493 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Constantinou, E., Ampatzoglou, A., Stamelos, I.: Quantifying reuse in OSS: a large-scale empirical study. Int. J. Open Source Softw. Process. (IJOSSP) 5, 1–19 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hristov, D.: Structuring software reusability metrics for component-based software development. In: 7th International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kakarontzas, G., Constantinou, E., Ampatzoglou, A., Stamelos, I.: Layer assessment of object-oriented software: a metric facilitating white-box reuse. J. Syst. Softw. 86(2), 349–366 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin, R.C.: Agile Software Development: Principles, Patterns and Practices. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nair, T.R.G., Selvarani, R.: Estimation of software reusability: an engineering approach. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 35(1), 1–6 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Runeson, P., Höst, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case Study Research in Software Engineering: Guidelines and Examples. John Wiley & Sons, New York (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma, A., Grover, P.S., Kumar, R.: Reusability assessment for software components. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 34(2), 1–6 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Washizaki, H., Yamamoto, H., Fukazawa, Y.: A metrics suite for measuring reusability of software components. In: 9th International Software Metrics Symposium. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the action “Strengthening Human Resources Research Potential via Doctorate Research” of the Operational Program “Human Resources Development Program, Education and Lifelong Learning, 2014–2020”, implemented from State Scholarship Foundation (IKY) and co-financed by the European Social Fund and the Greek public (National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) 2014–2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Apostolos Ampatzoglou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ampatzoglou, A., Bibi, S., Chatzigeorgiou, A., Avgeriou, P., Stamelos, I. (2018). Reusability Index: A Measure for Assessing Software Assets Reusability. In: Capilla, R., Gallina, B., Cetina, C. (eds) New Opportunities for Software Reuse. ICSR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10826. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90421-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90421-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90420-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90421-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics