Skip to main content

Financing of Higher Education Institutions: Access to Funds and Issues of Equity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education Finance, Equality, and Equity

Part of the book series: Education, Equity, Economy ((EEEC,volume 5))

  • 775 Accesses

Abstract

Many developing countries have reached the stage of massification of higher education . But, the journey to massification is driven by most of these countries through private investment rather than public sector initiative unlike the countries in developed economies. While there is a growing demand for higher education, the fully funded public higher education institutions in urban regions lax attitude to explore alternative sources of funds have negative impact on existing scarcity of public funds to meet the urgent needs of other important sectors. It has serious implications for the existing higher education institutions in under-developed regions struggling for funds to cater to the growing demand for higher education. The paper is based on a case study of a private aided higher education institution located in a developed region of India.

The objective of the study is to identify the major funding sources of a private aided college and exploring the possibility of other innovative sources of funding. The equity implications of such financing method is examined which has got policy concerns.

The methodology of the study is mixed method approach using both quantitative and qualitative data for analysis. Four types of instruments are developed to collect data from college administration, accounts section, students and teachers. Interview schedules and focused group discussions were also undertaken for the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The major assumption of HC theory is that, the labour market is homogenous and the contribution of the individuals in the production structure is detrimental of investment by individuals on HC.

  2. 2.

    As per the audit report, the surplus amount of the college is deposited with the general fund and in case of deficits in any financial year the general fund amount is used for expenditure.

  3. 3.

    Though any such analysis of utilization could be made with a small sample size but few observations are made out of the data received through the student questionnaire.

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1972). Higher education as a filter. Journal of Public Economics, 2, 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audit Report 2013–2014. (2014). Private-aided college. In Delhi, India. India: University of Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1976). The empirical status of human capital theory: A slightly jaundiced survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 14, 827–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creedy, J. (1995). The economics of higher education: An analysis of taxes versus fees. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1996). Indian economic development and social opportunity. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India [GOI]. (2006). Report of the working group on higher education: 11th five year plan 2007–12. New Delhi, India: Planning Commission, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India [GOI]. (2012). Twelfth five year plan. New Delhi, India: Planning Commission, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India [GOI]. (2013). Rashtniya Uchchatan Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA). New Delhi: MHRD in association with TISS, Mumbai, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadria, B. (1989). The subsidies question in higher education, tight-rope walking for public policy makers in developing countries. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 3(1), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lleras, M. P. (2004). Investing in human capital: A capital markets approach to student funding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, T. (1983). Investments in education and social choice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W. (2006). Education finance policy: Financing the non-market and social benefits. Journal of Education Finance, 32, 264–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Human Resource Development [MHRD]. (2012). Analysis of budgeted expenditure on education 2008–09 to 2010–11. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Planning, Monitoring and Statistics, Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Retrieved from http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/statistics/ABE_2008-11_2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Human Resource Development [MHRD]. (2014). Analysis of budgeted expenditure on education 2010–11 to 2012–13. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Planning, Monitoring and Statistics, Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Retrieved from http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/statistics/ABE_2010-13.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Human Resource Development [MHRD]. (2015). Analysis of budgeted expenditure on education 2011–12 to 2013–14. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Planning, Monitoring and Statistics, Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India. Retrieved from http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/statistics/ABE2011-14.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1989). Public finance in theory and practice (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahi, J. (2017). Resource allocation and innovative methods of financing higher education in India (CPRHE Research Papers 6). New Delhi, India: Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education, National University of Educational Planning and Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G. (1987). Economics of education, research and studies. New York, NY: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2004). Human capital and rates of returns. In G. Johnes & J. Johnes (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of education. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. E. (2000). Equality of opportunity. In K. Arrow, B. Samuel, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. A. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stager, D. (1989). Focus on fees: Alternative policies for university tuition fees. Toronto: Council of Ontario Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1975). The theory of “screening”, education and distribution of income. The American Economic Review, 65, 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilak, J. B. G. (2004). Public Subsidies in Education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(4), 343–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO Institute of Statistics [UIS]. (2014). Education: Expenditure on education as % of total government expenditure (all sectors). Retrieved from http://data.uis.unesco.org/index.aspx?queryid=183.

  • University Grants Commission [UGC] (1993). UGC funding of institutions of higher education: Report of Justice Punnayya Committee 19921993. New Delhi, India: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ugc.ac.in/oldpdf/pub/report/9.pdf

  • University Grants Commission [UGC]. (2013). Annual report (pp. 2012–2013). New Delhi, India: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, N. V. (2001). The limits to diversification of sources of funding in higher education. Paris, France: UNESCO/IIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, N. V. (2015). Challenges of massification of higher education in India (CPRHE Research Papers 1). New Delhi, India: Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education, National University of Educational Planning and Administration.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinusha Panigrahi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table A.1 Determinants of student fees and implications

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Panigrahi, J. (2018). Financing of Higher Education Institutions: Access to Funds and Issues of Equity. In: BenDavid-Hadar, I. (eds) Education Finance, Equality, and Equity. Education, Equity, Economy, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90388-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90388-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90387-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90388-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics