Abstract
We are witnessing a dominant trend in contemporary documentary practice, whereby films abandon the longstanding ideal of objectivity in favor of more diverse and subjective perspectives on reality. Blurring the boundaries between subject and filmmaker, “first-person documentaries” invite us to critically reflect on the processes by which viewers distinguish nonfiction from fiction. This chapter posits that such assessments depend on the cognitive principle of framing, with viewers drawing on a wide array of textual, contextual and real-world cues to construe a film as documentary or otherwise. First-person films could be understood as a sub-frame of documentary, with its own set of expectations and unique emotional affects. This is demonstrated through a case study of Kirsten Johnson’s 2016 film, Cameraperson.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a similar claim, presented from a phenomenological perspective, see Vivian Sobchack’s (1999) article, “Toward a Phenomenology of Nonfictional Film Experience.”
- 2.
It is worth keeping in mind how much of our knowledge of history is mediated and may be subject to various degrees of manipulation, so that “historical reality” in this context must be taken to mean a commonly agreed-upon understanding of historical events rather than a literal record of them.
References
Austin, J. L. (1970) Philosophical Papers. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Barthes, R. (1981; 2010) Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill and Wang.
Bazin, A. (1960) “The Ontology of the Photographic Image,” Film Quarterly, 13(4), pp. 4–9.
Bondebjerg, I. (1994) “Narratives of Reality: Documentary Film and Television in a Cognitive and Pragmatic Perspective,” Nordicom Review, 1, pp. 65–85.
Bondebjerg, I. (2014a) “Documentary and Cognitive Theory: Narrative, Emotion and Memory,” Media and Communication, 2(1), pp. 12–21.
Bondebjerg, I. (2014b) Engaging with Reality: Documentary & Globalization. Bristol: Intellect.
Bruzzi, S. (2006) New Documentary. 2nd edn. London; New York: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York; London: Routledge.
Churchland, P. S. (2011) BrainTrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Corner, J. (2006) ‘The Subject in Documentary’, Screen, 47(1), pp. 125–128.
Corrigan, T. (2011) The Essay Film: From Montaigne, After Marker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Currie, G. (1995) Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Currie, G. (1999) ‘Visible Traces: Documentary and the Contents of Photographs’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57(3), pp. 285–297.
Ebert, R. (2003) Review of Tarnation [Online]. Available at: http://www.ebertfest.com/six/tarnation_review.htm (Accessed: December 21, 2016).
Eitzen, D. (1995) ‘When is a Documentary?: Documentary as a Mode of Reception’, Cinema Journal, 35(1), pp. 81–102.
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Grodal, T. (2009) Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film. New York: Oxford University Press.
Grodal, T. and Kramer, M. (2010) ‘Empathy, Film and the Brain’, Semiotic Inquiry, 30, pp. 19–35.
IDFA (International Documentary Filmfestival Amsterdam) (2016) Review of A Strange Love Affair with Ego [Online]. Available at: https://www.idfa.nl/nl/tags/project.aspx?id=0EB122D3-2D7D-474F-9AFE-25948DD336E8 (Accessed: December 21, 2016).
Lambert, K. (2012) “The Parental Brain: Transformations and Adaptations,” Psychology & Behavior, 107(5), pp. 792–800.
Lane, J. (2002) The Autobiographical Documentary in America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Lebow, A. (2012) The Cinema of Me. London; New York: Wallflower Press.
Maner, J. K., Luce, C. L., Neuberg, S. L., Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. and Sagarin, B. J. (2002) “The Effects of Perspective Taking on Motivations: Still No Evidence for Altruism,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), pp. 1601–1610.
Minsky, M. (1975) “Framework for Representing Knowledge,” in Winston, P. (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Movieclips Film Festivals & Indie Films (2015) Heart of a Dog Official Trailer 1 [Documentary Movie HD] [Online]. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v37BnyHefnY (Accessed: 21 December 2016).
Nichols, B. (1991) Representing Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Nichols, B. (2010) Introduction to Documentary. 2nd edn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
O’Connell, J. M. (2015) Traversing the Divide: Cognitive Approach to the Dialogical Nature of First Person Documentary. Groningen: University of Groningen.
Plantinga, C. (1997) Rhetoric and Representation in Non-fiction Film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Plantinga, C. (2009) “Emotion and Affect,” in Livingston, P. and Plantinga, C. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Film. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 86–96.
Plantinga, C. and Smith, G. M. (1999) Passionate Views: Film, Cognition and Emotion. Baltimore, MD; London: The John Hopkins University Press.
Rascaroli, L. (2009) The Personal Camera. London: Wallflower Press.
Renov, M. (2004) The Subject of Documentary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rombes, N. (2009) Cinema in the Digital Age. London: Wallflower Press.
Smith, G. M. (1999) “Local Emotions, Global Moods,” in, Plantinga, C. and Smith, G. M. (eds.) Passionate Views. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 103–126.
Smith, G. M. (2003) Film Structure and the Emotion System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sobchack, V. (1999) “Toward a Phenomenology of Nonfiction Film Experience,” in Gaines, J. M. and Renov, M. (eds.) Collecting Visible Evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 241–254.
Tsang, H. (2011) “Emotion, Documentary and Van der Keuken’s Face Value,” Studies in Documentary Film, 5(1), pp. 17–30.
Tsur, R. (2008) Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Sussex: Sussex Academic Press.
Wolf, W. (2006) “Introduction: Frames, Framings and Framing Borders in Literature and Other Media,” in Wolf, W. and Berhhart, W. (eds.) Framing Borders in Literature and Other Media. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 1–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ros, V., O’Connell, J.M.J., Kiss, M., van Noortwijk, A. (2018). Toward a Cognitive Definition of First-Person Documentary. In: Brylla, C., Kramer, M. (eds) Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90332-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90332-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90331-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90332-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)